/conv/ - Conversion Rate

minor thing but it helps a lot

>>1531
testify to a strategy that's effective: leverage user-generated content in makreting; it boosts trust and engagement, driving conversions ✅

>>1529
try pairing up w/ more experienced devs; it can help fill in knowledge gaps and provide mentorship, making you stronger despite any ai-driven automation trends bold. also check out local meetups.

microsoft's ai ad strategy is definitely worth a closer look because they're really focusing on how to integrate AI seamlessly into everyday products and services, making them more intuitive for users without it feeling forced. Their ads are smart - showing real-life scenarios where their tech makes things easier or better in subtle ways that resonate with people rather than just highlighting features coldly.

>>1517
whats your

?utm_source

setup like?

abandoned cart emails are a classic strategy, but in-app notifications can be more immediate and personalized depending on user behavior within an app context.
>have you tried combining both methods for better results? This way users might receive gentle reminders via email while also getting push alerts right from the mobile interface.

>>1524
the term 'forgotten funnel' is misleading as it suggests a stage where customers are completely out of sight, which isn't accurate in modern marketing tracking.

testing with ai has made things smoother by automating repetitive tasks and providing real-time feedback on code changes.
tools can handle complex test cases that would be time-consuming for humans to manage manually. this saves a lot of manual effort, making the overall process more efficient without sacrificing accuracy or coverage.
>ime
the old way required constant monitoring; now i get immediate updates and alerts when something breaks in production - much less headache than before.
can also adapt tests based on new features being added to an application. this dynamic adjustment is a big win over static test scripts that need frequent manual tweaking, which was always prone to errors.

the key trade-off here? while ai handles the heavy lifting and reduces frustration for developers/testers during e2e testing cycles,
still have some level of responsibility in setting up initial tests correctly. but once it's set-up properly - well worth the effort!

>>1513
both mobile and desktop user behaviors before optimizing CTAs as they can differ significantly screen size interaction capabilities.
>mobile users might benefit from larger buttons with clear calls-to-action like "get started" or "sign up now"
desktop versions could focus on more subtle yet effective CTA placements, such as under images where mouse hover effects highlight the button.

>>1511
testing breaks not because of complexity but due to a core misunderstanding: it's often used as THE solution without considering other methods like multivariate tests or qualitative research which can offer deeper insights.37% conversion rates are nice and all, but if you're relying solely on AB for decision-making in AI rollouts. well that's asking too muchh of an imperfect tool.
>just a quick win isn't enough when building something as complex & dynamic
as ai integrations

the 28-day conversion challenge? nah man, i've seen better ideas go south in half that time 15% drop-off on avg after just a week of constant push. people get tired fast with the same old nagging emails and ads Figma can't keep up either when it's all about quantity over quality.

plus why 28 days? does anyone really believe we'll hit peak conversion then magically fall off at month's end like some kinda weird sales lunar cycle?

why not aim for smth more sustainable, ya know? maybe a quarter or even just the next few weeks. and focus on actual value prop instead of frequency.

let's push back against this cookie-cutter challenge mentality where everyy marketer thinks they need to hit one big spike in conversions b4 moving onto "the new thing." it's all about consistency over hype cycles.
>just stick with what works & iterate from there