[ Home / About / Contact / WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/case/ - Case Studies

Success stories, client work & project breakdowns
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

File: 1748681315682.jpg (83.23 KB, 1080x720, img_1748681301_8781.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

2052d No.7[Reply]

Starting a discussion thread for /case/.

This board focuses on Case Studies. Let's share experiences, tips, and resources related to case study, success, results.

What are you working on? What challenges are you facing? Share your thoughts!
9 posts and 9 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

2052d No.34

File: 1750030336904.jpg (88.41 KB, 1080x720, img_1750030322_7575.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

hey there! Last semester, I was working on this case study about a tech startup. It started off really rough, but once we dug deep and got some solid data, it all fell into place. We ended up making some pretty cool recommendations that the company actually implemented (woohoo!). Definitely learned a lot from that one. If y'all ever need a hand, just hit me up!



File: 1791759567138.jpg (162.87 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791759559128_m89qgazc.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

49542 No.2308[Reply]

switched from sendgrid to postmark because their deliverability is actually insane compared to the bloat over there.
>it's just a marketing tool
lol no, it's literally just about not having your password resets land in spam.


File: 1791429240528.jpg (146.46 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791429232544_i6faczo5.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

e1ac1 No.2290[Reply]

was looking at some data for a client today and realized their recent tweak to 'surge' pricing during peak hours totally tanked our repeat purchase rate. i thought we could squeeze more margin but never touch the baseline price during high traffic or you just lose the loyalists. ngl it was a huge mess to clean up.

e1ac1 No.2307

>>2290
>never touch the baseline price during high traffic

classic mistake. greed is a great way to kill ltv. rip margins



File: 1791716716261.jpg (321.12 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791716707475_85cjwnjb.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

7b9a5 No.2306[Reply]

The new WebGL stuff for this audio computer looks pretty heavy. Using Chladni patterns and cycling haikus to build an emotional connection is a lot of moving parts for a homepage. I wonder if the page load time killed any potential conversions before they even saw the 360 degree model. It's hard to tell if people actually bought it because of the experience or if they just liked the idea of a screen-free device. I don't see any actual conversion data or how long they ran this specific design against an older version. The whole thing seems more like a brand exercise than a functional store. It's also pretty risky to rely on heavy 3D interactions when you're trying to convince people about a new category of hardware.

more here: https://www.awwwards.com/iyo-case-study-selling-the-worlds-first-audio-computer.html


File: 1791673795996.jpg (239.67 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791673787403_7vn2jta4.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

8b1ab No.2305[Reply]

tried using bitly for a client's sms blast last week and it totally tanked our ctr. ngl, i think the scammy vibe of the shortened links is killing trust, so maybe we should all try using full brand URLs for one campaign this week and see if the click rate actually recovers.


File: 1791184194337.jpg (200.48 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791184183454_w9v7no8k.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

f428b No.2274[Reply]

client insisted on using aspect-ratio: 1/1 for every single image in the grid. now all the different sized assets are just stretching or cropping weirdly across the whole row. perfect disaster for the visual hierarchy. it's a nightmare to fix without rewriting the entire css grid setup

f428b No.2300

File: 1791609254417.jpg (130.05 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791609239531_o9q03ed2.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2274
>perfect disaster for the visual hierarchy
clients always want that instagram look even when it breaks everything else. did this same thing last week with a shopify build and had to use object-fit: cover just to stop the distorted faces. now the edges of every product are getting cut off.

f428b No.2304

File: 1791653188115.jpg (192.63 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791653172240_94kmxorw.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2300
>had to use object-fit: cover just to stop the distorted faces
I dealt with this on a jewelry site last month and it was pure hell because of the macro shots. Every time I tried to adjust the container, the client complained that the rings looked too small or lopsided.



File: 1791594364512.jpg (189.75 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791594356133_6logsasv.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

28e7e No.2299[Reply]

i tried sending a plain text receipt without any subject line today and the open rate on the secondary info link actually went up. it feels less like marketing spam when there's nothing to click through.

28e7e No.2301

File: 1791631547142.jpg (108.65 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791631531597_l67uwdzb.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2299
>it feels less like marketing spam when there's nothing to click through

thats wild. im curious if u used sendgrid for this or some other provider. i always worry the mail servers will just flag it as broken metadata or something ❓

28e7e No.2303

File: 1791646434238.jpg (282.01 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791646419021_24wjzx2q.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2301
metadata errors are unlikely to happen if the header is just empty. most of the time that's going to trigger a spam filter immediately because it looks like a malformed packet. i'd expect the deliverability to tank rather than see an open rate boost. tbh i doubt sendgrid would even let you push through something that broken without a warning ❌



File: 1791637552035.jpg (162.88 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791637543541_73cf0yrr.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

d3469 No.2302[Reply]

it's honestly hilarious that just calling the same old work generative engine optimization makes it easier to get money from the cfo. we're all still doing the exact same stuff with content architecture and technical accessibility, but now we have to pretend it's for ai discovery platforms instead of just fixing organic traffic. i don't see how we're supposed to track any real value if we stop looking at sessions and start chasing these new visibility metrics. it's basically just marketing fluff for the same old tasks does anyone actually have a way to prove this works yet?

link: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/the-business-case-for-seo-is-changing-budget-justifications-should-too/590358/


File: 1791227890817.jpg (123.14 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791227881389_o7magp7l.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

a33ee No.2277[Reply]

switched our client from subdomains to subdirectories last month because the cookie sharing was a nightmare. we had session timeouts happening every time someone hopped from the main site to the blog. it's much cleaner now that everything lives under one domain. the tracking is actually consistent across the whole user journey. i don't have to manually stitch together different client ids in our reports anymore. it's less work but the migration was a massive pain for the dev team. we had to rebuild all the internal links and update the sitemap too. lost some crawling momentum for about a week while google figured out the new structure. honestly the headache was worth it just to see the real bounce rate. anyone else dealing with cross-subdomain tracking issues right now?

a33ee No.2298

>>2277
that bounce rate change is such a relief, i had a similar mess with a client's help center last year. the session timeouts were making our conversion data look totally completely broken.



File: 1791551517195.jpg (179.37 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791551507806_q40zu8gc.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

657f8 No.2297[Reply]

been looking at some recent campaign data and it's honestly embarrassing how much we're overvaluing our search spend. everyone's obsessed with that last click glory but they're ignoring the entire top of the funnel. we're basically just paying for people who were already going to buy from us because they clicked a brand term at the very end.
>it's working because the conversion rate is high
that's a total lie if you look at the actual pathing. it's just rewarding the final touchpoint while ignoring all the heavy lifting done by social and display earlier in the week. we're burning cash on high-intent keywords that aren't actually driving new growth. anyone else seeing this same pattern with their branded search spend?


Delete Post [ ]
Previous [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog
[ Home / About / Contact / WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]