[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/serp/ - SERP Analysis

Search results performance, rankings & competition
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

File: 1748615853102.jpg (64.52 KB, 1080x810, img_1748615837_3230.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

c34ba No.5[Reply]

Starting a discussion thread for /serp/.

This board focuses on SERP Analysis. Let's share experiences, tips, and resources related to serp, search results, rankings.

What are you working on? What challenges are you facing? Share your thoughts!
8 posts and 8 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

2dad3 No.1939

File: 1784452234803.jpg (120.93 KB, 1024x1024, img_1784452193535_rc7tx7a7.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>5
the idea that we can just "share resources" ignores how much the zero-click reality is killing organic traffic. most of what people call search results now are just snippets and ads designed to keep you on google instead of clicking through. unless you're targeting long-tail queries that trigger specific feature snippets, you're basically fighting for scraps.
>it's getting harder to justify SEO spend when the answer is already visible in the snippet

i've noticed a massive shift where even top-ranking sites are losing visibility bc of how the sge/ai overviews are being rolled out. the content is still there, but nobody sees it anymore . what kinda metrics are you actually tracking to measure success when clicks are plummeting but impressions stay stable?



File: 1785158256273.jpg (178.93 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785158217947_a38u9dkn.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

86879 No.1977[Reply]

tracking if llm citations actually drive dollars is a nightmare. u basically have to map everyy single ai referral and mention back to ur crm to see the real revenue impact . anyone found a way to automate linking these direct leads without manual tagging?

article: https://www.semrush.com/blog/ai-visibility-roi/

86879 No.1978

File: 1785159149818.jpg (366.4 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785159109143_xml0xm8o.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

try using custom utm parameters on any deep links you can control, then use a webhook to pipe that data straight into your lead scoring model. it won't catch everything from the llm response itself, but it makes the leads you do capture much easier to track via zapier.



File: 1785121919875.jpg (292.12 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785121880683_lc7gfk26.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

39ad3 No.1975[Reply]

the rise of generative summaries makes organic clicks feel almost impossible to capture. is anyone actually seeing any traffic from traditional blue links anymore?

39ad3 No.1976

File: 1785123456070.jpg (122.43 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785123441331_04g95ar8.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the only traffic im seeing is from long-tail queries that are too specific for a summary to handle well. if the user intent is purely informational, they just stay on the google results page and never touch your site. it's basically turning search into a giant answer engine instead of a gateway. are you seeing any lift from images or video snippets lately?



File: 1785036130889.jpg (160.38 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785036121868_gctnye0g.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

dc01f No.1970[Reply]

the top three results are now almost entirely sponsored links making it nearly impossible to find unpaid content w/o scrolling. organic rankings are becoming a secondary feature

dc01f No.1971

File: 1785036282965.jpg (151.38 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785036268204_snwamu5o.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1970
i've started using the uBlock Origin custom filters to hide those specific ad containers. it makes finding the actual results much faster since u don't gotta dodge the clutter.

f9a56 No.1974

File: 1785087665813.jpg (156.79 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785087624122_b15q23iu.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1970
its even worse when you include the ai overviews which push the first organic link way below the fold.



File: 1785079036573.jpg (114.03 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785078997427_r1jtstvu.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

83a47 No.1972[Reply]

is anyone else seeing a massive shift in top of page visibility lately? it feels like the search results are becoming heavily dominated by vertical snippets and even when we maintain our primary position, the actual click-thru rate is plummeting hitting new lows.

83a47 No.1973

File: 1785079846353.jpg (241.16 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785079804120_7mlirf1x.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

you checked if the user intent has shifted toward informational/zero-click queries? i'm seeing stable positions but the snippet content is clearly stealing the click via answer engine optimization patterns.



File: 1784999853250.jpg (137.78 KB, 1024x1024, img_1784999814332_z674w2o8.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

bc6eb No.1968[Reply]

deciding between running custom python scripts or using a paid service is tricky. manual checks are fine for small niche keywords , but they fail when tracking high-volume competition across multiple regions. automated monitoring is the only way to catch sudden ranking drops before they ruin your traffic . you might think it is too expensive , but the consistent data stream is worth the cost.

bc6eb No.1969

File: 1785000656539.jpg (120.03 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785000614652_tql6n7f3.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

tried running my own requests loops for a client once and lost track of a core algorithm update for three days becasue the proxy rotation failed



File: 1784957060010.jpg (69.59 KB, 1024x1024, img_1784957022408_137t3d1a.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

7b127 No.1966[Reply]

relying on private windows for serp checks is a huge mistake because it ignores your actual user intent signals . if you want to see what competitors are actually winning, you need to analyze the search features that appear in localized or logged-in environments. instead of refreshing the browser, try using a simple python script with import requests; response = requests. get(" to scrape raw html and see what elements are truly present. focus on identifying patterns in the featured snippets and local pack rather than just looking at organic blue links. checking for hidden intent is much more valuable than just tracking position 1 chasing a number. the real battle is winning the zero-click results.

7b127 No.1967

File: 1784957208656.jpg (140.76 KB, 1024x1024, img_1784957193880_n2m5fxb9.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1966
scraping raw html is great, but you also need to check for personalized snippets that only trigger based on specific user clusters. if you aren't rotating your proxy headers, you might still be seeing a generic version of the results. fr.



File: 1784927549388.jpg (102.93 KB, 1024x1024, img_1784927512545_c2j31mmm.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

7df97 No.1964[Reply]

clients are constantly asking if their brand is actually showing up in ai responses. most of us are still just guessing because there isn't a single dashboard that gives a clear answer yet. i found some ways to track measurable signals from current data sources instead of relying on vibes. it helps to focus on things like brand mentions and direct citations in the training sets. it is basically just tracking a new type of organic visibility . anyone else figured out a way to pull actual numbers for this?
>i am tired of saying i dont know

found this here: https://searchengineland.com/your-client-just-asked-if-they-show-up-in-chatgpt-now-what-482951

7df97 No.1965

File: 1784928892470.jpg (133.18 KB, 1024x1024, img_1784928852082_tjroxlwh.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

tracking mentions in training sets is a bit of a stretch since those datasets are essentially black boxes. how are you actually verifying if a mention is from the original training data versus just a recent crawl?



File: 1784884624242.jpg (122.46 KB, 1024x1024, img_1784884585069_xtp1ejk2.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

664bd No.1962[Reply]

been digging through sistrix data for us and uk domains to see what actually moved between may 26 and june 2. the rollout was active from may 21 to june 2, and the shifts aren't just random noise. looking at the biggest winners, it seems like intent and how well a site matches the specific market are the main drivers here. it is not just about backlink profiles or old school seo authority anymore. instead, the big visibility swings are coming from changes in source type and deeper alignment with user needs.
>the biggest shifts happened when the content matched the underlying intent perfectly

it feels like google is getting much more aggressive at filtering out sites that have the right keywords but the wrong purpose for the query. it is basically a massive purge of low-utility pages . i am seeing a lot of movement in how specific types of sources are being prioritized over generalist sites. has anyone else noticed their rankings tanking despite having no technical errors or lost links? it looks like the market fit aspect is becoming the new king of the core updates.

https://www.aleydasolis.com/en/ai-search/google-may-2026-core-update-analysis-intent-market-fit-and-source-type-drove-the-biggest-visibility-shifts/

a0d6d No.1963

File: 1784885352261.jpg (183.23 KB, 1024x1024, img_1784885337210_c70t8xxi.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1962
the shift toward source type alignment makes sense if you look at how google is prioritizing forum threads and reddit for certain queries. i've noticed that even with decent topical authority, a site gets buried if the searcher clearly wants a direct answer or a community consensus rather than a long-form article. instead of focusing on keyword density, try auditing your top landing pages against the current SERP features to see if you are cmopeting for the wrong format entirely. sometimes the best seo strategy is just admitting a reddit thread does the job better than your blog post. did you notice any specific industries where the "authority" sites specifically lost ground to these newer source types?



File: 1784841821570.jpg (277.58 KB, 1024x1024, img_1784841808616_soh7vzal.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

2b709 No.1960[Reply]

the recent shift toward zero-click results is making it nearly impossible to track true visibility through standard analytics. most of our traffic now comes from indirect brand searches rather than direct keyword hits. we need to focus more on brand impressions and less on the vanity metric of raw organic click-through rates

2b709 No.1961

File: 1784842002315.jpg (209.21 KB, 1024x1024, img_1784841985139_fj52bmu5.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

focusing on brand impressions is fine, but you're ignoring how much share of voice actually matters for the bottom line. instead of just watching impressions, i've started using search_console to track "impression share" by looking at queries where we rank in positions 1-3 even if they don't drive clicks. it helps identify which topics are still building that brand authority despite the zero-click reality.



Delete Post [ ]
Previous [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">