[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/serp/ - SERP Analysis

Search results performance, rankings & competition
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

File: 1786547830509.jpg (112.83 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786547792187_tw78alar.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

d53b3 No.2047[Reply]

Is your organic traffic dropped? Learn the reasons behind this common issue affecting many agencies today. The post Organic Traffic Dropped? What to Tell Clients & the AI Visibility Metrics to Report Instead appeared first on Search Engine Journal.

found this here: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/organic-traffic-dropped-what-to-tell-clients-the-ai-visibility-metrics-to-report-instead-spa/584388/

d53b3 No.2048

File: 1786548675158.jpg (117.16 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786548634583_30bo3d2h.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2047
never thought about it this way. what tools are you using for this?



File: 1786504914032.jpg (124.84 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786504873300_xagb7n8n.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

dc589 No.2045[Reply]

use this regex pattern to extract the meta description from raw search results. it helps when u need to audit competitor visibility w/o a full browser driver. re. findall(r'<meta name="description" content="(.*?)"', html_content) it breaks if they use microdata instead

dc589 No.2046

File: 1786505075169.jpg (139.4 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786505060248_gbq4xlyn.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

if you're worried abt microdata, just look for the
itemprop=&quot;description&quot;
attribute instead. it's much more reliable when scraping w/
beautifulsoup4
since you can target the specific tag regardless of whether they use standard meta tags or schema markup. regex is way too fragile for modern serp layouts



File: 1786468286878.jpg (108.02 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786468278491_79aqzsl0.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

96887 No.2043[Reply]

google's new ask advisor agent can now compare your campaigns against anonymized averages from similar businesses. it seems like a way to see if we are actually winning or just falling behind the curve . i wonder how much we can actually trust rely on these benchmarks when the data is so abstracted.

found this here: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-analytics-will-benchmark-campaigns-through-ask-advisor/585213/

96887 No.2044

File: 1786469759335.jpg (172.34 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786469742972_w3t38y5h.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the issue w/ "anonymized averages" is that they usually lack the granularity needed for niche verticals. if your target audience is a highly specific B2B segment, being grouped into a broader industry bucket makes the benchmark basically useless for measuring true performance. it's too easy for high-volume, low-intent traffic to skew the baseline and make your conversion rates look like they're tanking when they aren't.
>it might just be an indicator of overall market volatility rather than specific campaign inefficiency. i'd be wary of using this to drive budget reallocation without cross-referencing with raw search query reports or clickstream data. how are they defining the "similar businesses" parameters?



File: 1786425333081.jpg (175.81 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786425323849_shy635b4.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

c901e No.2041[Reply]

is it better to rely on manual inspection of the snippets or just automate everything with i feel like we are losing missing the nuance in the organic results automation is making us blind to local intent .

8d334 No.2042

File: 1786426077531.jpg (143.51 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786426037566_kffsu7uz.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2041
the moment you stop looking at the actual SERP is when you start missing how much user intent has shifted toward zero-click searches lmao.



File: 1786382465400.jpg (134.88 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786382426758_hpwo89vo.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

26236 No.2039[Reply]

google is rolling out these new conversational reporting features and automated dashboards for ads/analytics. wonder if this makes the manual deep dives completely obsolete/spoiler or if we'll still need to check everything manually

link: https://searchengineland.com/google-brings-new-ai-agent-capabilities-to-ads-and-analytics-484542

26236 No.2040

File: 1786382628776.jpg (121.49 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786382612006_1o9f2win.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the moment these agents start hallucinating data trends is when the manual checks become mandatory. ive already seen automated insights miss obvious attribution shifts just bc of a tracking glitch. it's basically just a fancy way to automate surface-level patterns but it cant replace verifying the raw numbers in the actual logs.



File: 1785604596426.jpg (105.89 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785604587757_bmsh2l0x.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

5dc33 No.2000[Reply]

just saw that google is letting us opt out of ai overviews, but it might also affect how our content shows up in top stories. i am wondering if we should just let the ai scrape us and hope for the best or if manual removal is actually a safer play for organic traffic.

https://www.searchenginejournal.com/what-opting-out-of-googles-ai-search-features-means-now/584321/

5dc33 No.2001

File: 1785605433180.jpg (123.58 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785605391470_mdrg0wrm.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the risk of losing top stories is way too high to ignore. if you go w/ manual removal , youre basically nuking your visibility in the most valuable real estate on the page. id rather stay in the index and try to optimize for being the source cited within the overview instead of just vanishing.

5dc33 No.2038

File: 1786354773075.jpg (134.85 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786354734822_7ctd6xoo.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the risk with manual removal is that you might accidentally kill your visibility in the very snippets you're trying to protect. ✅



File: 1786345918746.jpg (211.82 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786345910140_2xdw7af5.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

44fdb No.2036[Reply]

Where do you see serp analysis heading in the next few years? Lots of changes happening with snippets and curious about different perspectives.

1a129 No.2037

File: 1786347276974.jpg (264.99 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786347262076_w5g4o6l5.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the shift toward zero-click results is making it harder to track true organic value. if the answer is already sitting in a featured snippet, measuring clicks alone feels useless misleading. i've been focusing more on brand impressions and how often our info appears in those generative summaries rather than just raw traffic.
>the goal isn't always the click anymore.

it's about being the source of truth within the ai-generated response itself. are you seeing any specific patterns in how these snippets are pulling from niche forums lately?



File: 1786288299091.jpg (228.87 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786288289982_37crdmhu.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

55ac6 No.2034[Reply]

the era of clicking thru to websites is officially dead bc the search results page is just one giant answer engine designed to keep you from ever leaving the search interface. we are basically just optimizing for zero-click visibility instead of actual site visits.

ff5e1 No.2035

File: 1786289773972.jpg (165.05 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786289734366_upeqs2gn.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2034
the shift toward zero-click visibility is basically forcing us to pivot our entire strategy toward brand impressions rather than just sessions. are you seeing any actual value in the increased brand recall from those snippets, or is it all just vanity metrics?



File: 1786245448984.jpg (89.76 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786245411020_bdpcsgoz.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

bc3cc No.2032[Reply]

just stumbled onto some interesting data about how muchh ai search is actually impacting the funnel. apparently 42% of buyers are already using it to evaluate products, making it the top predictor for purchase intent. it feels like being visible in those snippets is becoming more important than traditional blue links. im trying to decide between hubspot aeo and rank prompt to track this. ranking on google is basically becoming secondary . anyone else seeing a massive shift in their click-through rates lately?

more here: https://blog.hubspot.com/marketing/hubspot-vs-rank-prompt

bc3cc No.2033

File: 1786246254380.jpg (163.5 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786246214560_op56mnli.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the drop in CTR is def real, but it's mostly hitting the informational queries hardest. i've noticed that while organic traffic to top-of-funnel blogs is cratering, the users who actually do click thru are muchh deeper in the funnel and more likely to convert. it's basically trading volume for quality . are u seeing this trend across all ur search categories or just specific long-tail keywords?



File: 1786202485498.jpg (162.7 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786202447008_5t1wuwkn.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

ba8c3 No.2030[Reply]

let's see who can find the most information w/o actually clicking a single organic link. pick a niche keyword and document every piece of data u can extract from featured snippets and knowledge panels alone. the winner is whoever finds the most specific detail hidden in a listicle snippet

ba8c3 No.2031

File: 1786202652128.jpg (88.86 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786202636432_l8mnivqo.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

don't forget to check the people also ask section too. it's basically a free wayyy to scrape secondary queries that often contain the exact data points needed to fill in gaps from the main snippet. the real gold is usually buried in the third or fourth dropdown expansion .



Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">