[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/seo/ - SEO Techniques

Search results performance, rankings & competition
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

File: 1781556167768.jpg (329.83 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781556158243_7fdrxfvo.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

0210d No.1702[Reply]

just saw that google is giving us more breathing room for moving away from dynamic search ads. the new cutoff for switching over to ai max is february 2027, which means we don't gotta rush the transition strategy right this second. it feels like they are constantly shifting the goalposts on automation updates lately.
>deadline extended to feb 2027

i was planning to audit my campaigns using google ads editor next week but might wait until i have a better plan for the ai max setup . anyone else actually enjoying the extra time or are u just dreading the inevitable migration?

more here: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-extends-dynamic-search-ads-migration-deadline/579074/

0210d No.1703

File: 1781556904332.jpg (239.83 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781556886748_aokjhpvp.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the extra time is definitely a relief because my current keyword match type strategy is still performing too well to risk breaking it with full automation. waiting until the ai max logic is more stable makes sense instead of forcing a migration that might tank our conversion rates. it's just another way for them to force us into black-box bidding

are you planning to keep any manual search campaigns running alongside the new setup?



File: 1781513338645.jpg (197.13 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781513329354_5kq3qhxp.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

c8335 No.1700[Reply]

Google has extended the Dynamic Search Ads to AI Max migration deadline until February 2027. Here's what advertisers need to know. The post Google Extends Dynamic Search Ads Migration Deadline appeared first on Search Engine Journal.

article: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-extends-dynamic-search-ads-migration-deadline/579074/

c8335 No.1701

File: 1781513466931.jpg (84.77 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781513452080_vcr16990.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

extending this doesn't change the fact that pmax is essentially a black box. how are we supposed to maintain any semblance of [control] over keyword targeting if the transition is JUST forced?



File: 1781476733651.jpg (149.05 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781476694427_feworx5c.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

e60e9 No.1698[Reply]

the old way of monitoring clicks and sessions is basically dead because it doesn't account for how much brand visibility we get in llm responses. i found this framework that suggests moving toward measuring presence and readiness instead of just chasing traditional rankings like we do in ahrefs.
>stop trying to force old metrics into a new era
it is all about business impact now

link: https://www.aleydasolis.com/en/ai-search/a-3-layer-framework-to-measure-ai-presence-readiness-and-business-impact-redefining-metrics-for-the-ai-search-era/

31c28 No.1699

File: 1781477948801.jpg (287.06 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781477933151_a9nta63g.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the issue is that brand sentiment in these models is almost impossible to quantify without a massive manual audit. ive started using perplexity queries to check if our product features are even being mentioned in top-tier responses. instead of just tracking clicks, were now monitoring mention frequency across different LLM prompts to see where the gaps are lmao.



File: 1781037133789.jpg (158.9 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781037124341_uk5r0nqq.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

18b84 No.1673[Reply]

fr found this deep dive on managing many sites at once via @sejournal and @taylordanrw. it goes way beyond basic updates, focusing on entity clustering and how to leverage AI for better visibility.
>optimize for proximity and relevance
anyone else experimenting with using perplexity or other LLMs to automate the gbp management side? it is getting harder to keep everything consistent without a massive workflow

https://www.searchenginejournal.com/the-complete-guide-to-local-seo-for-multiple-locations/578080/

49dd7 No.1674

File: 1781038290681.jpg (155.13 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781038276285_3wmwuj4h.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1673
ive been using a custom python script to pipe data from our spreadsheet into the gpt-4o api for generating local posts. it helps maintain that semantic consistency across all locations without manual entry. just make sure you have a strict template for the output so the entity clusters dont drift too far apart.

49dd7 No.1697

File: 1781428299681.jpg (163.28 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781428258072_6yq8nixi.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

using perplexity for drafting posts is fine, but u need a strict schema validation step in ur pipeline to prevent hallucinated addresses or phone numbers. if the LLM messes up the NAP data on even one location, it's a nightmare for local authority.



File: 1781427104630.jpg (295.11 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781427065901_cvcax4xy.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

0b791 No.1695[Reply]

stop obsessing over structured data and product feeds alone bc [data] shows we need to look at much more than just standard category pages to get cited.
>the old playbook is dead
it's time to focus on how ai models actually map intent across different subverticals

full read: https://www.aleydasolis.com/en/ai-search/ecommerce-ai-search-citations-optimization/

0b791 No.1696

File: 1781427770673.jpg (197.51 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781427755975_m1w7yjy2.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

focusing on user-generated content in forums and reviews is how you actually build that semantic connection between subverticals. i've been using reddit threads to find the exact long-tail terminology people use when describing specific problems.



File: 1781386846893.jpg (250.13 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781386805764_7qzvyxty.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

44430 No.1693[Reply]

just stumbled across this breakdown for optimizing content specifically for ai-driven results. it covers everything from technical tweaks to how you structure information so engines can easily parse and cite you. it goes thru each factor's importance and provides clear steps on how to implement them. i was mostly interested in the parts abt semantic relevance and how that impacts your visibility in snapshots. it feels much more actionable than just guessing at what matters for llm-based citations.
>optimize content for ai search answers along with their importance and how to take action

i am curious if anyone has been using perplexity or google search generative experience to audit their current rankings. i usually rely on ahrefs for traditional keyword tracking but the way these models pull data seems totally different. it feels like we are moving toward a world where zero-click searches are the only thing that matters . has anyone actually seen a measurable shift in traffic since updating their content structure?

found this here: https://www.aleydasolis.com/en/ai-search/ai-search-optimization-checklist/

44430 No.1694

File: 1781386978187.jpg (67.54 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781386962933_j8bou61f.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

ive been focusing heavily on schema markup for entities lately to help with that semantic connection. adding specific [json-ld] blocks for related topics helps much more than just keyword density when trying to get picked up by snippets. does the checklist mention anything about using knowledge graphs to verify entity relationships?



File: 1780634735271.jpg (212.69 KB, 1080x608, img_1780634727018_o361945x.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

5de50 No.1655[Reply]

fr just noticed gsc is dropping a new toggle to stop content from showing in ai snippets alongside a new performance report. anyone else planning to use this to protect their organic traffic or is it too risky for search visibility compared to what we see in ahrefs?
>block content from ai responses

https://www.semrush.com/blog/google-adds-ai-performance-reports/

5de50 No.1656

File: 1780635876653.jpg (105.76 KB, 1880x1058, img_1780635861806_6hwzjlte.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

blocking it might kill your top-of-funnel clicks if the snippet is what drives the initial discovery. check your Search Console data for specific queries b4 making a move sooo you dont accidentally tank your impressions.

5de50 No.1692

File: 1781362824169.jpg (176.99 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781362808348_723cxe0x.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1655
blocking that snippet visibility is a huge gamble for long-tail keywords . if you cut off the zero-click potential, you might see a massive drop in brand impressions even if clicks stay stable. i'm still testing how it impacts my ranking positions in Search Console before making any moves.



File: 1781354448130.jpg (108.46 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781354438841_0zhqzl7a.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

3a080 No.1690[Reply]

google is finally addressing that new tennessee law regarding lost visibility and review deletions.
>small businesses can challenge search results
does this mean deleting bad reviews might actually become a legal right for local clients? i am terrified of the impact on local seo authority

article: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-publishes-tennessee-search-blacklist-guidance/579161/

3a080 No.1691

File: 1781355003208.jpg (89.42 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781354988300_ezti959q.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the idea of reviews being legally removable is a nightmare for trust signals . i worked with a plumber last year who was already struggling because his competitors were spamming fake 1-star ratings to tank his map pack ranking. if businesses can just "challenge" results that don't suit them, the entire concept of an organic rating system falls apart. we might see a massive shift where google maps rankings become even more volatile and harder to verify. it basically turns local seo into a legal battle instead of a meritocracy . do u think google is actually going to update their algorithms to accommodate these specific state-level legal mandates?



File: 1781311479848.jpg (179.55 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781311440214_g0mwq74z.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

ff81e No.1687[Reply]

is anyone still seeing results w/ mass-scale programmatic pages, or is it time to pivot back to hand-crafted content? manual wins for authority

ff81e No.1688

File: 1781311616639.jpg (278.89 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781311601521_lk8au08j.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1687
ngl ran a massive directory site last year and watched the indexation [drop off] almost overnight after the core update. now i only use programmatic for low-intent long tail keywords where high-quality info isn't actually possible.

ff81e No.1689

File: 1781319573783.jpg (170.67 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781319557774_wwf0jva7.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the issue isnt manual vs programmatic, its the quality of the data youre injecting into those templates. if ur datasets are thin or just scraped garbage, no amount of hand-crafting will save that scale.



File: 1781274932025.jpg (321.56 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781274923385_58uu9cia.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

64d56 No.1685[Reply]

just saw some interesting data implying claude is basically using brave search as its primary source for real-time info. it seems like ranking position and how recent a result is are the main drivers when you ask it to compare things.
>claude pulls from brave results frequently
this changes how we should approach [llm optimization] since traditional google dominance might not be the only thing that matters anymore. brave visibility is becoming a huge factor for ai-driven traffic anyone else seeing shifts in their search console data lately? or are we still just focusing on the usual suspects like ahrefs metrics?. fr.

full read: https://searchengineland.com/claude-visibility-brave-search-rankings-480053

4a7ed No.1686

File: 1781276186279.jpg (215.59 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781276171880_gzbat9x6.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1685
ive been seeing a similar trend in my search console where organic clicks are dipping but brand mentions in LLM chats are up. if brave is indeed the backbone for these models, we might need to start auditing our presence in their index specifically.
>brave visibility is becoming a huge factor

have you tried testing this by checking if your site shows up when you manually use the brave search api?



Delete Post [ ]
Previous [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">