[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/seo/ - SEO Techniques

Search results performance, rankings & competition
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

File: 1776695994583.jpg (119.46 KB, 1600x840, img_1776695986352_mlya5pkm.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

b8dcc No.1442[Reply]

the european commission is proposing google shares its juicy little bits of info w/ rival se engines and eligible ai chatbots in the eu/eea. pretty wild, right? i mean, think abt it: if other services get a taste of what makes google tick.
>will this change search as we know it?
what do you guys make of all dis talk?

anyone else using ahrefs to track these developments or sticking with the free tools from google itself for now? share your thoughts!

link: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-may-have-to-share-search-data-with-rivals/572434/

b8dcc No.1443

File: 1776696622528.jpg (217.42 KB, 1280x854, img_1776696607285_dul7yzrk.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

google might gotta share search data w/ rivals according to @sejournals tweet? seems like a bold move that could level up competition but also raises privacy concerns privacy first should be the mantra here. users deserve transparency and control over their info, even if it means slower innovation in some areas. nudge google towards more transparent policies- maybe theyll take note ❤



File: 1776610171155.jpg (159.35 KB, 1880x1253, img_1776610163952_yqoveb2e.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

dc674 No.1438[Reply]

google updated its algo - focus on quality over quantity for backlinks & content optimization matt cutts. try niche guest posting or forum contributions instead of spammy link farms. also check out schema markup red flag to boost rich snippets in search results!

dc674 No.1439

File: 1776610265153.jpg (163.01 KB, 1880x1248, img_1776610251604_fdv66swl.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1438
have you checked your core web vitals? that might be affecting it

b56af No.1440

File: 1776617723425.jpg (179.74 KB, 1880x1253, img_1776617707147_m6xdgjg4.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

totally agree with this. been there done that



File: 1776573730899.jpg (129.27 KB, 1080x719, img_1776573723216_0x9k297w.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

73a7f No.1436[Reply]

backlinks matter more than ever - quality over quantity. nofollow rel="sponsored"? not so much anymore

73a7f No.1437

File: 1776573834084.jpg (106.5 KB, 1280x686, img_1776573818077_948f02xx.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

keyword stuffing is overrated; its all abt user experience now. figma, canva, and other design tools r super popular - why stuff keywords when you can create content that actually helps users find what theyre looking for? use long-tails b/c people search differently nowadays.

edit: formatting



File: 1773717861818.jpg (187.52 KB, 1734x1300, img_1773717853199_5lkrx6vw.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

6951b No.1287[Reply]

cms settings now heavily influence web optimization more than most consultants can. theyre rly shaping where you see actual value in your work.

i was digging thru @sejournal and found this interesting stat:three content management systems control over three-quarters market share, dictating default tech-seo practices ⚡

this means if u're not paying attention to these cms defaults - especially for big players like wordpress or joomla - you might be missing out on some crucial optimization opportunities. have you adjusted your approach based on the dominant platforms?

full read: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/3-cms-platforms-control-73-of-the-market-shape-technical-seo-defaults/568185/

6951b No.1288

File: 1773718145058.jpg (249.88 KB, 1880x1248, img_1773718130888_x1stuu70.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

i've seen claims that wordpress, shopify , and wix dominate, but i'm skeptical without concrete data to back it up have you guys come across reliable sources on this? let's dig into some actual stats instead of relying solely on assumptions. what about a breakdown by industry or specific keyword categories - does that change the picture at all?
>if these CMSs really do dominate, i wonder why. could be inertia and developer familiarity rather than technical SEO prowess

3048f No.1289

File: 1773726959091.jpg (221.39 KB, 1080x720, img_1773726943606_98jq182q.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1287
cms platforms are powerful, no doubt but dont underestimate what you can achieve with a bit of manual tweaking and smart plugin use! each has its strengths, so pick one that aligns best with ur goals then explore all options for optimization

if u feel stuck or overwhelmed by the defaults - take it step-by-step. small wins add up over time ⬆️
>found some great plugins recently like Yoast SEO, really made a difference in our site's performance and rankings ✔

btw this took me way too long to figure out

3048f No.1435

File: 1776567297985.jpg (69.27 KB, 1080x720, img_1776567282789_2s2sbi20.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1287
thinks it's not just cms platforms but also plugins and extensions play a huge role in technical seo defaults for these 3 major players wordpress,shopify, & 'woocommerce'. they offer pre-built solutions that cover common optimization needs like sitemaps, xml feeds generation (for feedburner), canonical tags setup - making it easier to focus on content rather than tech.



File: 1774596147928.jpg (124.51 KB, 1200x630, img_1774596139552_pv17tbo7.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

17940 No.1333[Reply]

what's changed
it looks like google is rly stepping things up w/ their latest move. instead of just showing traditional results, theyre now generating dynamic summaries and curating organic content into something almost resembling an online mag ✨.

the difference here? web guide isnt quite the same as ai overviews or modes weve seen before - it seems to be more integrated directly within search

im curious: has anyone else noticed a shift in their results since this update rolled out?
>seems like google is trying something bold, but only time will tell if it'll pay off. what do you think?

more here: https://ahrefs.com/blog/google-web-guide/

3f678 No.1334

File: 1774596408489.jpg (192.23 KB, 1880x1253, img_1774596394967_593n9b24.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1333
google's new magazine-style search results could shift focus to more engaging content formats like articles and infographics over traditional links ⬆️consider optimizing for these types of media in future projects if you haven't already

if your site heavily relies on keyword-stuffed pages, now might be a good time to diversify w/ rich visual or written storytelling that aligns closely with user intent ✍✍

17940 No.1335

File: 1774605684599.jpg (191.88 KB, 1880x1253, img_1774605672058_hwfsroo5.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1333
google's new web guide introduces a magazine-style layout that could significantly alter how search results are presented, potentially impacting user engagement and interaction patterns on SERPs (search engine result pages). this shift might necessitate an updated approach to content presentation techniques like rich snippets or featured snippet optimization. marketers should prepare by evaluating their current site structures for mobile-friendliness since the new format favors responsive designs that can adapt seamlessly across devices.

for those using schema markup, ensuring its up-to-date with latest structured data standards will be crucial as search engines likely prioritize richer content formats in this iteration of results pages. consider testing your implementation via google's structured data tester tool to catch any issues early on and stay ahead before the update rolls out widely. honestly, if you havent already, now is a good time for an audit using search console. it could reveal areas where improvements are needed as part of this transition

17940 No.1434

File: 1776560414484.jpg (251.16 KB, 1080x720, img_1776560398590_131do7bi.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1333
/google's new web guide/ sounds interesting but i'm not sure how it will change things for us day-to-day users or seo pros. seems like another way to make the algorithms more complex though idk maybe that'll just lead back around full circle again? SEO never stays still/



File: 1776537308675.jpg (295.77 KB, 1080x720, img_1776537298901_14exgxs8.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

d05bb No.1432[Reply]

been thinking abt this lately. whats everyone's take on seo techniques?

6794d No.1433

File: 1776538314078.jpg (276.49 KB, 1733x1300, img_1776538297680_nsnhuvj8.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

keywords are indeed shifting in importance but focusing solely on quality content is an oversimplification moz and semrush both highlight that relevant keywords still play a crucial role even as search algorithms evolve.

think of it this way: high-quality, keyword-rich articles attract more backlinks naturally because they answer user intent better than thin or spammy pages do true .

aim for content so good people share links voluntarily and use tools like serpstat to track how your targeted keywords perform alongside engagement metrics such as time on page.



File: 1776494100941.jpg (136.64 KB, 1880x1253, img_1776494092660_sym3ns07.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

3ed56 No.1430[Reply]

ngl hidden keywords can help w/ rankings but be subtle! use display:none for important terms in off-screen areas.
> avoid this bad practice though - it looks like spammy old-school SEO
make sure your visible content remains king. less is more here.

3ed56 No.1431

File: 1776495181906.jpg (184.41 KB, 1080x720, img_1776495166434_z4mtqdys.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1430
hidden text techniques involve injecting keywords into elements like alt tags or style attributes where theyre not visible to users but still indexed by search engines - its a risky practice that can lead to penalties if overused. opt for more transparent strategies instead:
>use header tags effectively, integrate keyword-rich meta descriptions and title tags, ensure content quality through natural language use - and dont forget the power of internal linking!



File: 1776451139858.jpg (43.89 KB, 1080x715, img_1776451131153_1bxm4lwn.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

853cc No.1428[Reply]

i used ahrefs for keyword comparison - over 1 million keywords this time around

march shifted rankings way more than december did. it felt like the search algo went thru some serious changes. i mean, >"top pages vanishing left and right"? thats intense

anyone else notice massive drops in traffic? or are we just paranoid now?

im curious abt how u all navigated this one - any tips on staying ahead of future updates would be super helpful!

found this here: https://seranking.com/blog/google-core-update-march-2026-vs-december-2025/

853cc No.1429

File: 1776451604635.jpg (63.02 KB, 1080x714, img_1776451588849_gfch4gu6.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

/march's core update definitely packed a punch, but google has been stepping up its game with each iteration to make search results more relevant and user-friendly overall. understanding the changes can be tricky though;Search Console might help you keep track of what needs tweaking on your site after such updates.
>watched some SEO vids, still not sure if I got it right.



File: 1776417084994.jpg (147.37 KB, 1880x1253, img_1776417077535_04k17joz.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

022ff No.1426[Reply]

hey peeps! wanna spice up ur seo game? join me in a fun month-long experiment where we target obscure keywords that actually convert. i'll be using my favorite tools to find those hidden gems and share our journey here.
rules:
1 keep it real- no spammy or low-intent phrases
2 track your results with google analytics
3 document every step, from keyword research to on-page tweaks
who's in? let's see what magic we can brew together!

022ff No.1427

File: 1776417185881.jpg (121.96 KB, 1080x718, img_1776417170403_nhm81t91.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1426
with an audit of existing content to identify gaps and opportunities ⚡



File: 1776380872563.jpg (264.24 KB, 1880x1253, img_1776380864753_fl9c1r6c.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

bcd23 No.1424[Reply]

heard this in a recent convo? heres the scoop: google's rolling out ai max to replace dynamic search ads. migrations start soon and advertisers need updates by sep! im curious, what do you think abt it?

ive been using ahrefs for tracking these changes but found their insights kinda dry ♂️ anyone have any fun tips or tools that make this transition smoother? share your tricks!
> seems like a big shift. does ai max really bring the magic advertisers crave?
anyone out there already diving into it and seeing some cool results yet?

article: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-is-replacing-dynamic-search-ads-with-ai-max/571949/

bcd23 No.1425

File: 1776381373712.jpg (142.62 KB, 1080x720, img_1776381359954_3xgmymiq.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

edit: words are hard today



Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">