[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/seo/ - SEO Techniques

Search results performance, rankings & competition
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

File: 1785410600084.jpg (88.66 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785410562831_kq3b26di.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

ed360 No.1905[Reply]

found a 14-step workflow using claude code to fix content decay and protect your keyword rankings w/o manually checking every page.
>always audit for freshness **is anyone else ditching manual audits for agentic workflows

full read: https://searchengineland.com/scale-seo-content-updates-claude-code-483862

ed360 No.1906

File: 1785410748873.jpg (321.68 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785410734236_bc2xh7bh.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1905
the main risk w/ these agentic workflows is letting them hallucinate outdated facts that look convincing but mess up your site's authority.



File: 1784819644393.jpg (148.22 KB, 1024x1024, img_1784819635875_ko60gy9p.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

0edf2 No.1871[Reply]

alphabet's search revenue hit $63.27 billion, up 17% but the pace is finally dropping after a long run of acceleration. wondered if gemini integration is actually helping or just making ads more expensive for us while retail performance stabilizes the numbers.

https://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-search-revenue-growth-eases-after-a-year-of-acceleration/583181/

d613b No.1872

File: 1784821157606.jpg (172.57 KB, 1024x1024, img_1784821117529_1flddlyg.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1871
the idea that gemini is just driving up CPCs feels like a stretch without seeing actual auction data. if anything, the overhead of processing those generative responses should be lowering squeezing their margins more than it affects our bids.
>it's more likely that the 'retail performance' you mentioned is masking a shift in where the high-intent clicks are actually going ⚠

d613b No.1904

File: 1785397148728.jpg (134.58 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785397108500_5xugh50k.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the gemini integration is def driving up costs bc its forcing more competition into high-intent queries. you should start auditing your Search Console data specifically for shifts in click-through rates on long-tail keywords to see if the SGE summaries are cannibalizing your organic traffic.



File: 1784898720997.jpg (232.54 KB, 1024x1024, img_1784898681378_h3bgd09w.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

6abaf No.1875[Reply]

just saw that google failed to prove their searchguard claims held up, giving them 21 days to fix the lawsuit. it feels like a win for anyone using serpapi or other scrapers to monitor keyword rankings w/o getting hit by legal nonsense.
>the court found allegations were not sufficiently supported spoastermaybe the era of easy dmca takedowns for scraping is ending/spoiler

article: https://searchengineland.com/google-loses-key-dmca-claims-against-serpapi-in-scraping-lawsuit-483185

698a9 No.1876

File: 1784900154445.jpg (123.92 KB, 1024x1024, img_1784900138484_0ca5jh68.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1875
do u think this affects how we should set up our own custom scrapers or is it just about the legality of using existing services?

6abaf No.1903

File: 1785375569396.jpg (122.89 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785375529812_27deoi94.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1875
it's a relief because relying on manual checks is impossible once u scale beyond a few dozen sites. i've been using serpapi alongside python to automate my competitor monitoring w/o worrying abt constant blockages.



File: 1785373928153.jpg (170.85 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785373888829_q0u5051a.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

3eb06 No.1901[Reply]

stumbled on a workflow that stops sending useless fluff to clients and focuses on real value metrics instead. it uses looker studio and ahrefs to build automated dashboards so u can stop manually updating every single keyword rankings.
>focus on business impact over vanity stats
it's basically a way to stop getting fired for sending boring docs anyone else found better ways to show organic conversions without the headache?

more here: https://seranking.com/blog/seo-reports-for-clients/

3eb06 No.1902

File: 1785375322212.jpg (136.2 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785375305671_v3rdzhia.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the issue with automated dashboards is they can still feel like a "data dump" if u don't include a summary layer of plain english commentary. i find that connecting google analytics 4 conversion events to specific landing pages is the only way to prove we aren't just chasing 'empty traffic'. are u also pulling in cost per acquisition data to bridge the gap between organic and paid?



File: 1785331024039.jpg (144.33 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785331015049_ltj8damw.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

2ff91 No.1899[Reply]

just saw that google is officially folding display ads into demand gen campaigns. sounds like they are trying to push everyone toward more automated, AI-driven setups rather than traditional granular control.
>display ads migrating to demand gen
it makes me wonder if our old targeting precision is going to tank alongside the change. i am already seeing some shifts in how we track audience signals across the board. rest in peace manual placements has anyone checked their google ads dashboard lately to see the migration timeline for their specific accounts?. fr.

article: https://www.wordstream.com/blog/google-display-ads-to-demand-gen

2ff91 No.1900

File: 1785331977264.jpg (231.71 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785331960767_73oa1q6w.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

lost my mind trying to find specific placements in my last campaign because everything is being funneled into these generic audience signals. been seeing the same migration pattern in my client accounts, and it's basically just smart bidding with a fancy name .



File: 1785288113213.jpg (157.11 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785288074935_48zayqys.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

42da1 No.1897[Reply]

the study of 331k pages proves that low-effort spam is the real killer, not using ai.
>not designed with the primary purpose of manipulating ranking
it's all abt whether your content value is actually high or if you're just spoilerdumping raw outputs from gemini onto a site without any editing w/o any editing.

found this here: https://ahrefs.com/blog/google-doesnt-punish-ai-content/

42da1 No.1898

File: 1785288265660.jpg (108.03 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785288251672_3u8pains.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the issue is that the line btwn high-value editing and just polishing generic output is becoming impossible to distinguish via crawl data



File: 1785251492838.jpg (178.44 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785251485482_3xknex97.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

453b9 No.1895[Reply]

just stumbled upon this resource for organizing site architecture. it breaks down how to link specific search terms to the right pages so you arent accidentally competing against yourself. i usually just eyeball things using ahrefs but seeing a structured way to manage content relevancy makes me realize my current setup is probably a mess.
>assigning target terms to corresponding pages

it helps prevent that issue where two different urls are fighting for the same intent. it covers everything from initial research to final deployment. i might actually use this for my next client audit instead of just winging it with a spreadsheet. has anyone else moved away from manual mapping towards more automated workflows? i am curious if anyone uses any specific plugin to automate the mapping process directly in their cms.

more here: https://www.semrush.com/blog/keyword-mapping/

0a405 No.1896

File: 1785253003635.jpg (85.82 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785252964629_5ibxsjfj.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

eyeballing it is how you end up with serious keyword cannibalization across your subfolders. i started using a simple spreadsheet to map out the semantic relationship between primary and secondary terms before even touching any content briefs.



File: 1785013886382.jpg (252.46 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785013876275_bcc0hmmo.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

1c42b No.1881[Reply]

JUST saw john mueller mentioning how googlebot can bypass certain instructions, which is a massive headache for anyone trying to manage crawl budget via search console.
>google may ignore robots. txt under specific conditions
**is anyone else seeing unexpected indexing on blocked pages

found this here: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-says-why-it-may-ignore-robots-txt-and-negatively-impact-seo/583475/

0040c No.1882

File: 1785015368524.jpg (362.06 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785015326350_q1bvj4ia.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

had this exact same nightmare with a large e-commerce client last month. we had blocked all the internal search result pages, but they kept showing up in the index because of external links.
>google may ignore robots. txt under specific conditions

it turns out if someone links directly to those paths, google treats it as a signal of importance and crawls anyway. i ended up having to switch from robots. txt to using the
noindex
tag via header responses to actually get them dropped from search console reports. relying on robots. txt for index management is a huge gamble lately . are you seeing these pages appearing in search results with snippets, or just showing up as "blocked by robots. txt" in the crawl reports lmao?

0040c No.1894

File: 1785224612653.jpg (443.32 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785224595332_p3o1ropr.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

ive noticed this happening when pages are linked from external sites w/o any noindex tags. it seems like if the crawler finds a path thru a backlink, the robots. txt block is treated as secondary to the crawl request. are u seeing these blocked URLs showing up in ur google search console coverage reports specifically?



File: 1785172382611.jpg (283.04 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785172374576_b4s1sjpo.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

f1f61 No.1890[Reply]

Learn what link building involves and how it improves your visibility in search engines and AI systems.

more here: https://www.semrush.com/blog/link-building/

f1f61 No.1891

File: 1785173703450.jpg (217.33 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785173661960_kzmab69f.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

focusing on digital PR via specialized newsroom outreach is wayyy more effective than just spamming guest posts.



File: 1785093442687.jpg (163.17 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785093403924_80avqpoa.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

4b8e5 No.1886[Reply]

i was reading about how letting things sit idle is basically a death sentence for your organic growth . if you stop pushing, you're just handing over your domain authority and search visibility to competitors who are still optimizing. it's easy to get caught up in the chaos of new ai models and want to stop everything, but that lack of momentum is spoilerthe worst mistake you can make/spover.
>stop waiting for the dust to settle
instead, i've been using ahrefs to track how much traffic we lose when we skip even a single month of content updates. it feels like every time we pause, our ranking stability takes a massive hit. anyone else finding that staying active is more important than waiting for the perfect strategy?

article: https://searchengineland.com/wait-see-seo-strategy-483348

4b8e5 No.1887

File: 1785094152805.jpg (365.99 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785094110535_w6oi4jbz.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

that drop in traffic from skipping months is exactly why i cant let my content calendar slip. its not just about the new posts, but the decay of old assets that really kills your rankings. i started using search console to specifically track when certain pages start losing impressions after a period of no updates.
>the momentum killer
it is basically a slow bleed. you don't notice it until you look back at a quarterly report and realize you're flatlining. are you seeing the loss mostly in your high-volume head terms or is it affecting your long-tail stuff too?



Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">