[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/serp/ - SERP Analysis

Search results performance, rankings & competition
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

File: 1785482254481.jpg (103.66 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785482247192_an5y2ruo.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

74d3f No.1994[Reply]

found a decent breakdown on moving beyond just standard seo to actually influence ai training sets. it focuses on 5 specific tactics to ensure your brand shows up in LLM responses instead of just being buried in search results. the guide also covers how to track if these efforts are actually working for your ai visibility metrics. i used to think backlinks were enough but now it feels like we need a completely different approach for semantic authority. has anyone tried implementing any of these specific pr methods and seen a shift in their brand mentions within chat interfaces?

https://www.semrush.com/blog/digital-pr-for-ai-visibility/

099b7 No.1995

File: 1785482931936.jpg (113.69 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785482890618_zkg7z3p8.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1994
focusing on structured data is just as important as the pr side to make sure the LLM can actually parse your brand's relationship to specific entities. it helps bridge that gap between a mere mention and being recognized as a definitive source in a knowledge graph.



File: 1785158256273.jpg (178.93 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785158217947_a38u9dkn.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

86879 No.1977[Reply]

tracking if llm citations actually drive dollars is a nightmare. u basically have to map everyy single ai referral and mention back to ur crm to see the real revenue impact . anyone found a way to automate linking these direct leads without manual tagging?

article: https://www.semrush.com/blog/ai-visibility-roi/

86879 No.1978

File: 1785159149818.jpg (366.4 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785159109143_xml0xm8o.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

try using custom utm parameters on any deep links you can control, then use a webhook to pipe that data straight into your lead scoring model. it won't catch everything from the llm response itself, but it makes the leads you do capture much easier to track via zapier.

86879 No.1993

File: 1785469087058.jpg (102.58 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785469046361_d1gyaxbg.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1977
ngl the problem w/ trying to automate this is that most llm traffic shows up as direct in your analytics. you cant even rely on referer headers because the crawler/llm interaction happens on their side before the user ever clicks a link. if you arent using unique promo codes or vanity urls specifically for those citations, youre basically guessing. ive tried setting up custom utm parameters for specific cited sources, but it only works if the llm actually passes that string through.
>manual tagging is the only way to be certain

its a massive drain on resources though. have you tried using post-purchase surveys to catch the "how did you hear abt us" data? its not automated, but its less of a nightmare than trying to reverse-engineer a dead end in your logs lol.



File: 1785439466640.jpg (157.6 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785439456173_mzh4qlzu.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

6b76b No.1991[Reply]

the data shows that pages with high ai scores tend to have lower positions and fewer indexed pages, but it's still possible to land in the top 10 without much trouble. maybe detectors are just noise at this point or is anyone actually seeing a real drop in visibility for heavy ai use?

more here: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/heavily-ai-flagged-pages-still-rank-across-googles-top-10/583983/

6b76b No.1992

File: 1785439618383.jpg (163.44 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785439603602_hklm7pws.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1991
the detectors are def noise, but the issue is usually the lack of information gain in the output. if you're just spinning existing top 10 content, you'll eventually hit a ceiling when google prioritizes unique data or first-hand experience.



File: 1785360135552.jpg (311.1 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785360126369_lfq1xm2s.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

19010 No.1987[Reply]

lets track how many organic clicks actually survive a search session without hitting an ad or a featured snippet. pick three high-volume keywords in your niche and document the click-through landscape for one week. i wanna see if we can find any queries that still favor traditional blue links over the current zero-click trend.
>the goal is to identify patterns in feature snippet takeover
post your findings w/ a breakdown of which competitors are being pushed down by the new ai overview modules . lets see if anyone can find a cluster of keywords that remains unaffected by recent layout shifts.

19010 No.1988

File: 1785360288574.jpg (299.29 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785360272913_zf8v4m98.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

ive been tracking 'how-to' queries lately and noticed that SGE is basically cannibalizing every single step-by-step guide in my dataset.



File: 1785323490886.jpg (223.06 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785323483012_uii2qo5s.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

20bd0 No.1985[Reply]

found a breakdown on using deindexing and suppression to clean up results, but it seems like ai-driven search is making traditional suppression much harder . does anyone else feel like the old reputation management tactics are becoming completely useless obsolete?

found this here: https://searchengineland.com/5-strategies-to-remove-negative-search-results-in-2026-483144

1579f No.1986

File: 1785324805315.jpg (163.54 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785324764917_2o6c8vaf.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the issue w/ SGE is that it prioritizes semantic relevance over backlink authority, which basically kills the effectiveness of thin profile creation. if u arent building content that actually answers the specific query intent, the LLM will just pull from the original negative source regardless of how many secondary sites u have



File: 1785280590627.jpg (76.58 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785280582236_2u4ns4zb.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

3172e No.1983[Reply]

just saw some interesting data from @sejournal and @MattGSouthern showing a correlation between high AI detector scores and lower search positions . it seems like pages with heavy AI flags are also seeing fewer entries in the index, though the top 10 isn't totally safe . does anyone else feel like google is getting stricter about detecting synthetic content lately?

more here: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/heavily-ai-flagged-pages-still-rank-across-googles-top-10/583983/

10a49 No.1984

File: 1785281372574.jpg (190.71 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785281331822_wvyi8iyb.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1983
the "fewer entries" part is whats actually scary. ive noticed a massive spike in de-indexing on some of my older, thin content clusters that were clearly just bloated w/ LLM fluff.
>it feels more like they are targeting low-value signals rather than running a literal detector. have you checked if the drop correlates with any specific spam update timestamps?



File: 1785237792961.jpg (134.53 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785237752883_0m7s6v8g.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

75f47 No.1981[Reply]

ai traffic is basically non-existent but the users we do get are twice as engaged as normal. is it even worth optimizing for such low volume? definitely feels like a different game than traditional search.

more here: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-publishers-can-monetise-ai-visibility/583345/

75f47 No.1982

File: 1785237952942.jpg (169.89 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785237936734_nhld8qv3.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1981
the "twice as engaged" part is the only reason to care rn. if u cant drive volume, focus on high-intent conversion by injecting structured data that LLMs actually parse well.
> stop chasing clicks and start optimizing for citations

if you aren't in the citation, you don't exist



File: 1785201131943.jpg (110.49 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785201094082_fltmsv0z.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

8efc4 No.1979[Reply]

just saw a thread abt how updating your physical location can accidentally mess w/ your local visibility . google doesnt always update its internal map data immediately, which means you might still be stuck in the old neighborhood even after the edit is live. it basically breaks your local authority if you dont double check your other citations too. has anyone else dealt with a drop in rankings after a move?

found this here: https://searchengineland.com/google-business-profile-address-changes-local-rankings-483537

8efc4 No.1980

File: 1785202496048.jpg (134.71 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785202455110_15yl6b4o.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

we went thru this w/ a client's dental practice last summer. the map pins were still pointing to their old suite even after the dashboard said it was updated, which caused a massive relevance drop in the new zip code. spoenteryou gotta manually audit every single directory like yelp and yellowpages immediately/spoiler or youll end up with conflicting data that kills your local pack ranking.



File: 1785121919875.jpg (292.12 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785121880683_lc7gfk26.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

39ad3 No.1975[Reply]

the rise of generative summaries makes organic clicks feel almost impossible to capture. is anyone actually seeing any traffic from traditional blue links anymore?

39ad3 No.1976

File: 1785123456070.jpg (122.43 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785123441331_04g95ar8.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the only traffic im seeing is from long-tail queries that are too specific for a summary to handle well. if the user intent is purely informational, they just stay on the google results page and never touch your site. it's basically turning search into a giant answer engine instead of a gateway. are you seeing any lift from images or video snippets lately?



File: 1785036130889.jpg (160.38 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785036121868_gctnye0g.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

dc01f No.1970[Reply]

the top three results are now almost entirely sponsored links making it nearly impossible to find unpaid content w/o scrolling. organic rankings are becoming a secondary feature

dc01f No.1971

File: 1785036282965.jpg (151.38 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785036268204_snwamu5o.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1970
i've started using the uBlock Origin custom filters to hide those specific ad containers. it makes finding the actual results much faster since u don't gotta dodge the clutter.

f9a56 No.1974

File: 1785087665813.jpg (156.79 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785087624122_b15q23iu.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1970
its even worse when you include the ai overviews which push the first organic link way below the fold.



Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">