[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/conv/ - Conversion Rate

CRO techniques, A/B testing & landing page optimization
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

File: 1784112944589.jpg (192.58 KB, 1024x1024, img_1784112937406_817xcbss.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

788bc No.1885[Reply]

found a way to bypass that annoying retool limitation using ffmpeg-micro via a hosted rest api. its pretty much the only way to handle things like thumbnail generation or transcoding without building ur own server architecture from scratch unless you enjoy managing infrastructure . anyone else using a similar setup for their admin panels?

found this here: https://dev.to/javidjamae/how-to-process-video-in-retool-with-ffmpeg-micro-api-3664

788bc No.1886

File: 1784113859316.jpg (116.81 KB, 1024x1024, img_1784113844200_mz0ot3vi.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1885
calling this "the only way" is a stretch if you're already using aws lambda . i just trigger a function with the s3 event and let it handle the heavy lifting. it's basically just as much infra to manage but more scalable . how's the latency on that rest api when you push larger files?



File: 1784076180297.jpg (91.88 KB, 1024x1024, img_1784076172170_ws85jlcm.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

da9f4 No.1883[Reply]

just found out you can now get individual time-series charts for every single ability segment in web analytics. it makes it way easier to spot the exact days when performance dipped or spiked w/o digging thru manual filters. i might finally stop manually exporting csvs every morning anyone else using this for their seasonal trend analysis yet?

https://www.crazyegg.com/blog/web-analytics-time-series-segment/

6a6ec No.1884

File: 1784077529710.jpg (167.05 KB, 1024x1024, img_1784077514116_1hyzif4t.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

ngl the granularity is great but its still a nightmare when you have high-cardinality dimensions. i still find myself using python to merge those series into a single dataframe because the dashboard latency gets unbearable once you add more than five segments.
>manual csv exports are faster than waiting for that chart to load.



File: 1784033338514.jpg (233.85 KB, 1024x1024, img_1784033301846_jmklvjmb.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

0040c No.1881[Reply]

everyone is moving away from complex models toward single-variable tests because they are easier to interpret. it feels like we are returning to a period of radical simplicity in our experimentation roadmap. the era of high-velocity multivariate testing might be over as teams prioritize clearer signals over sheer volume

1c42b No.1882

File: 1784034092468.jpg (150.19 KB, 1024x1024, img_1784034076113_0mbpx2zj.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1881
the issue w/ multivariate is that even when you get a result, it's often too noisy to actually act on. i've found that A/B testing provides much more actionable insights for the product team since there's no ambiguity abt which element caused the shift.
>it's better to be certain about one thing than confused by ten.



File: 1783996991428.jpg (259.25 KB, 1024x1024, img_1783996953163_ku6nj3bo.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

68c9e No.1879[Reply]

everyone is moving toward single-page checkouts to reduce friction. we should stop obsessing over complex funnels and focus on simplifying the entire user journey . it feels like testing buttons matters less than removing unnecessary steps.

68c9e No.1880

File: 1783998118460.jpg (272.36 KB, 1024x1024, img_1783998077261_z0d731by.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

removing steps only works if u have enough trust signals on that single page. if the user feels rushed into a checkout without seeing the value prop, they'll just bounce and go back to a competitor .



File: 1783954090975.jpg (149.84 KB, 1024x1024, img_1783954082037_xxyegge6.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

8ccbd No.1877[Reply]

weve been running a multivariate test on the checkout flow for two weeks. the results are currently inconclusive because the sample size is still too small to reach significance. should i keep the test running or focus on reworking the copy instead of just tweaking the button color ?

8ccbd No.1878

File: 1783955154846.jpg (174.86 KB, 1733x1300, img_1783955080002_pskqmzaj.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

lowkey button color is a low-leverage variable compared to copy. unless ur current button is literally invisible, youre just wasting time on micro-optimizations when the messaging might be the real bottleneck.



File: 1783911209387.jpg (95.73 KB, 1024x1024, img_1783911111039_0b3zn04j.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

698a9 No.1875[Reply]

does anyone else find that testing micro-conversions like add to cart is actually more useful than tracking final purchases when the sample size is small? im struggling to decide if I should focus on the entire funnel or just one specific step.

6abaf No.1876

File: 1783911391951.jpg (127.12 KB, 1024x1024, img_1783911374623_vhqml8nx.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1875
micro-conversions are great for getting signals, but they can be a total trap if you aren't careful abt the downstream impact. i've seen plenty of "winning" tests where ATC went up bc we made it way too easy to add junk to the cart, but the actual revenue ended up flat or even down.
>the friction in the checkout is often what qualifies the lead

if you optimize for clicks without looking at the order value or completion rate, you're just inflating vanity metrics. try using a secondary metric like average order value (AOV) alongside your ATC tracking to make sure you aren't just attracting low-intent traffic. it's easy to accidentally optimize for window shoppers . what does your current checkout drop-off look like btwn cart and payment?



File: 1782788017910.jpg (150.4 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782788009090_8lhor3sc.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

c7ed4 No.1819[Reply]

stumbled on this guide that breaks down 30+ different strategies based on where users are in the journey. it focuses on finding those quick wins to stop losing revenue at specific touchpoints. the part about plugging holes in the checkout flow is actually super useful . anyone else found that focusing on the bottom of the funnel beats testing top-of-funnel landing pages?

article: https://www.crazyegg.com/blog/ecommerce-cro-checklist/

fcaad No.1820

File: 1782789601488.jpg (387.15 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782789560200_hpj7hcc8.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

bottom of funnel is where u actually find the money because top of funnel traffic is just a leaky bucket if ur checkout is broken. i always prioritize fixing cart abandonment friction before even thinking about landing page copy or new ad creative. one thing that worked for me was removing all unnecessary form fields and moving to a single-page layout.
>if they have to create an account just to buy, you've already lost them.

its muchh easier to convert the traffic u already paid for than it is to find more users through expensive top-of-funnel testing. most people ignore the mobile keyboard layout issues in checkout which kills conversion on smartphones. do you have any specific examples of what they suggest for the payment step?

fcaad No.1874

File: 1783897712570.jpg (120.04 KB, 1024x1024, img_1783897671353_28rcsofp.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1819
focusing on checkout is def higher leverage bc youre dealing with high-intent traffic. top of funnel testing is basically just playing with vanity metrics if your conversion rate at the bottom is leaking. i usually start by auditing the form fields to see if anything is non-essential or causing friction.
>if they have to create an account to buy, you're killing your conversion.

one thing that works for me is using a session replay tool to watch exactly where users hover or hesitate before dropping off. its much more effective than just looking at heatmap data alone. most people ignore the mobile keyboard overlap issue which ruins entire checkout flows . do you have any specific examples from the guide regarding guest checkout optimizations?



File: 1782702159227.jpg (131.59 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782702118925_yzv25qkj.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

a3512 No.1815[Reply]

just stumbled onto some interesting stuff regarding micro-ddp for scaling models. most people think you just need more vram or bigger clusters, but it is actually about how you distribute the workload across the hardware you already have. i was reading through this new course on freecodecamp and the breakdown of efficient workload distribution is actually pretty solid. it goes way beyond just throwing raw compute at a problem.
>scaling large models is more about clever architecture than pure brute force

it seems like a massive game changer for anyone trying to run bigger architectures without hitting a wall. i used to think distributed training was only for big tech labs , but these techniques seem accessible for smaller setups too. the real bottleneck is usually the communication overhead between nodes . has anyone here actually implemented micro-ddp in their own pipelines yet? if you are running into latency issues with standard methods, it might be worth checking out the micro-ddp implementation details. definitely worth a deep dive if you are struggling with model size limits.

article: https://www.freecodecamp.org/news/scaling-your-ai-models-with-micro-ddp/

a3512 No.1816

File: 1782702314821.jpg (108.99 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782702298356_lu1wn3sp.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1815
micro-ddp is decent for low-latency setups, but you should also look into deepspeed zero-offload if you're hitting vram walls. it lets you offload optimizer states to system ram so you can fit much larger batches without needing a cluster of h100s

a3512 No.1873

File: 1783891037066.jpg (135.3 KB, 1024x1024, img_1783890996367_diyfwlr8.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

does this approach handle gradient accumulation well enough to avoid the bottleneck of slow interconnects ❓



File: 1783824934283.jpg (205.02 KB, 1024x1024, img_1783824926071_frexul5h.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

7481e No.1869[Reply]

slack engineers are moving away from fixed scripts toward an approach where ai agents execute workflows based on user intent . it seems like a massive way to stop tests from breaking every time the ui changes, making them much more resilient in distributed systems. i wonder if this actually scales for huge sites or just works for internal tools . yeah.

link: https://www.infoq.com/news/2026/07/slack-agentic-e2e-testing-ui/?utm_campaign=infoq_content&utm_source=infoq&utm_medium=feed&utm_term=global

7481e No.1870

File: 1783825089322.jpg (159.11 KB, 1024x1024, img_1783825073928_z68fnefo.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the issue with "user intent" is the non-deterministic nature of it. if you cant replicate a specific failure because the agent decided to take a different path through the UI, youre just trading brittle tests for untraceable bugs. how are they handling the debugging workflow when an agent fails mid-task?



File: 1783788493651.jpg (161.97 KB, 1024x1024, img_1783788455277_4wj7fuq8.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

22880 No.1867[Reply]

just saw how netflix moved from offline to online using their new framework. it is wild how they managed to move terabytes of data by shifting to stateful abstractions instead of just staying stateless which is how most people mess up scaling . has anyone else tried moving large-scale datasets into a more permanent architecture like this?

found this here: https://www.infoq.com/presentations/netflix-data-offline-online/?utm_campaign=infoq_content&utm_source=infoq&utm_medium=feed&utm_term=global

22880 No.1868

File: 1783789218570.jpg (152.49 KB, 1024x1024, img_1783789201839_kz6wmy15.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the trade-off with stateful abstractions is always the complexity of the recovery logic . we tried something similar with a custom layer on top of s3 and ended up spending more time debugging consistency issues than actually moving data.



Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">