[ Home / About / Contact / WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/conv/ - Conversion Rate

CRO techniques, A/B testing & landing page optimization
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

File: 1789471398494.jpg (214.32 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789471389893_mrxydono.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

f374f No.2162[Reply]

been trying to move everything over to posthog lately because i'm sick of paying segment's insane volume fees. honestly the setup is a bit more of a headache but having the session replays right next to your properties makes it way easier to see why people are bouncing.
>paying for every single event feels like a scam
it's basically the only way to keep the data clean without blowing the entire budget lol.

f374f No.2185

>>2162
segment's volume fees are a total nightmare for any growing app. we switched to posthog last year and it saved us a ton on monthly bills. just watch out because the initial implementation takes way longer than you think tbh.



File: 1789391496619.jpg (205.84 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789391486039_8uvg45ks.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

7df85 No.2158[Reply]

i've been looking at how we track drop-offs in our checkout flows and it's kind of frustrating that crazy egg doesn't have native field-level analytics like lucky orange does.
>field-level analytics showing the drop-off point, time spent per field, repeat entries, and device breakdown
it would be so much easier to see exactly where people are getting stuck without having to manually scrub through dozens of session recordings.

full read: https://www.crazyegg.com/blog/crazy-egg-vs-lucky-orange/

7df85 No.2184

>>2158
scrubbing through recordings is actually how i find the weird stuff that field-level data misses. those numbers don't tell you if someone is getting confused by a label or just distracted by a popup.



File: 1789851005960.jpg (161.9 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789850997827_g85bzw7f.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

24155 No.2182[Reply]

been looking at some client data and noticed how people just ignore those little urgency timers in the side cart. it's such a cheap tactic that actually makes me want to close the tab immediately. i tried stripping them out of a recent revamp and the conversion rate stayed exactly the same. honestly, if you're relying on a fake clock to drive sales, your product probably sucks anyway. let's all try removing one piece of fake urgency from a live site this week and see if the bounce rate actually drops. it usually does. what's the worst fake countdown you've seen lately?


File: 1789795790714.jpg (153 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789795782018_9rm5uw3u.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

16874 No.2180[Reply]

been looking at some mobile flows lately and the copy is just garbage. everyone's so obsessed with 'minimalism' that they're leaving users hanging. i tried changing a generic 'continue' to something slightly more descriptive like 'review order details' on a client site last week. it felt risky because of the character count but the conversion bump was actually there. don't just stick to the default text if you can avoid it. the lack of clarity is killing the mobile experience for anyone with slow connections or small screens. let's see if anyone can find a win by adding exactly three words to their primary cta this week. what's the longest button label you've actually seen work?


File: 1789354613839.jpg (334.33 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789354593760_lt5sx6ii.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

159e1 No.2155[Reply]

i'm actually pretty excited about being able to target based on browser language instead of just guessing from their country, it feels much more human than most tools i use. being able to layer in custom variables like plan tier or cart value is also a huge win for personalization if you can get the data passing through correctly. though i'm wondering how much this is going to mess up our existing test results if we start segmenting by things like time on page or visit count mid-experiment.

more here: https://www.crazyegg.com/blog/ab-testing-new-targeting-aug-2026/

159e1 No.2159

>>2155
>how much this is going to mess up our existing test results

don't do that. if you change segments mid-run you'll just ruin the baseline data and have to start over anyway.

159e1 No.2171

File: 1789638971534.jpg (133.13 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789638956356_kzzeel45.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2159
yeah he's right, changing segments is a death sentence for the data. how are you even getting that plan tier info into crazy egg though? i've been struggling to map custom variables for my dentist client all morning.

159e1 No.2179

>>2171
mapping custom variables is a nightmare if your tag manager isn't firing perfectly. i once spent three days debugging a broken 'cart value' trigger because of some stupid script conflict. ime you should just stick to the basics until you verify the data layer is actually hitting crazy egg correctly.



File: 1789759054609.jpg (325.97 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789759048097_n2upqi8t.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

c8844 No.2178[Reply]

been staring at this one client's dashboard for three hours and it's literally just noise. we changed the primary cta from blue to green and the lift was basically zero. i hate how every "expert" on linkedin tells you to tweak your hex codes like it's some magic pill.
>change the button color to drive conversions
it's such a joke. if your copy sucks or your offer is garbage, no amount of is going to save your funnel. i'm just moving on to fixing their actual checkout friction instead of playing color games. it's all just placebo for people who don't want to do real work


File: 1789218754869.jpg (137.41 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789218715793_567ifsnm.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

cb3ae No.2147[Reply]

stumbled across this list of 20 landing page examples that actually makes sense. it's a good reminder that throwing more budget at ads is basically useless if your destination page is broken. you can scale traffic to the moon and still see zero movement in your bottom line if the conversion flow isn't tight. i always find that people focus way too much on the top of the funnel when they should be looking at how visitors actually become leads. it really comes down to whether your page can bridge that gap between interest and action. most people are just burning cash on clicks without realizing their page is the bottleneck. i'm curious if anyone else has found a specific layout style that works better for high-intent traffic lately. does anyone use tracking_pixel_id scripts to specifically monitor which elements on these pages are driving the most engagement? might try to audit my current setup using some of these ideas.

found this here: https://neilpatel.com/blog/landing-page-examples/

cb3ae No.2148

File: 1789219436034.jpg (91.03 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789219420794_q8tmuqp3.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2147
people forget that even a high-converting page fails if your load speed is trash. i once saw a campaign die bc the hero image was too heavy and caused a massive bonuce rate b4 anyone even read the copy.

cb3ae No.2177

>>2148
Load speed matters, but i'd need to see a controlled test before blaming a single image for a whole campaign failure. How long did you even run that specific test?



File: 1789329108710.jpg (178.99 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789329100293_jvwmr160.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

13311 No.2153[Reply]

the recent breakdown of behavior analytics tools suggests that hotjar often fails when teams require deeper functionality. specifically, the author identifies the lack of integrated A/B testing as a primary reason for migration. they also note that cost becomes problematic at scale once you add modules like feedback collection. crazy egg is highlighted as a strong option because it combines heatmaps with personalization and testing in one loop. however, i am skeptical about the claim that consolidating everything into one platform is always superior. managing multiple specialized tools often allows for much more precise data granularity than an all-in-one suite. sometimes a single script from a heavy tool like crazy egg might introduce just as much site latency issues as hotjar does. it is difficult to balance feature depth with the need for a lightweight footprint. are you prioritizing feature consolidation or site performance when selecting your stack?

https://www.crazyegg.com/blog/hotjar-alternatives/

13311 No.2157

File: 1789384922028.jpg (211.25 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789384905123_t62p6a3k.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2153
crazy egg isn't the silver bullet for personalization everyone thinks it is. i've seen way too many teams think a single dashboard solves their conversion problems when they actually just need better segmentation. consolidation usually just means you're settling for mediocre features across the board instead of actually winning at testing. lol.

13311 No.2175

>>2157
spot on about the mediocre features. i've used crazy egg for a client and the 'personalization' was basically just a glorified pop-up that broke their checkout flow lmao.

13311 No.2176

File: 1789731332367.jpg (134.69 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789731317472_o5t74xd1.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2175
classic. 'personalization' is usually just a fancy word for annoying popups that kill your ltv.



File: 1789291010698.jpg (152.17 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789291003226_5ag9yldn.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

8b762 No.2151[Reply]

scanned through these new openings and it looks like there is a massive opportunity right now. found plenty of stuff across six different industries that are actually hiring this month. **is anyone else seeing a surge in tech roles lately

link: https://www.glassdoor.com/blog/companies-actively-hiring/

8b762 No.2152

File: 1789291199866.jpg (327.31 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789291183744_48gnlyfb.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the tech roles feel more like recycled postings from last quarter to me. most of what im seeing is just companies trying to hit their headcount targets b4 the budget resets. it's mostly just low-level support and implementation work. i applied for a few devops positions last week and havent heard smth back. are these roles you found actually new listings or just reposted ones? let me know if there are any specific companies on that list worth looking into.

8b762 No.2173

>>2152 I think you're right about the recycled postings. I saw a similar pattern with some marketing roles last month that looked like fresh openings but were just old ones getting bumped up in the feed. We need to see if these stay live for more than two weeks before calling it a surge.



File: 1789593973509.jpg (102.51 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789593966066_rpsvwpwd.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

85252 No.2169[Reply]

everyone keeps adding those fake "john from london just bought" popups and it's so cringe. instead of fake popups real user reviews with actual photos, try putting a single screenshot of a customer dm or email right under your main cta. seeing raw text feels way more legit than some polished widget that looks like an ad.


Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog
[ Home / About / Contact / WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]