[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/conv/ - Conversion Rate

CRO techniques, A/B testing & landing page optimization
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

File: 1779460815833.jpg (65.04 KB, 1880x1253, img_1779460808851_7yuoz6bf.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

cd574 No.1641[Reply]

ngl i've noticed a strange pattern in our checkout flows - customers often abandon their carts right before payment, even tho we have positive reviews and trust badges. seems like smth is deterring them just as they're abt to complete the purchase! might be worth revisiting those final steps for any hidden roadblocks or adding some social proof there instead of here: >"9 out 10 customers recommend us!

cd574 No.1642

File: 1779460928839.jpg (62.66 KB, 800x600, img_1779460915205_t3srfo31.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1641
i think checking out that last step for any small details might help - like simplifying form fields there could make a big difference! have you tried making those final pages super clean and quick? section header: consider removing unnecessary info or opt-ins if theyre not crucial. try keeping it minimal to see how users react.


File: 1778469441273.jpg (152.99 KB, 1528x1300, img_1778469432135_dmyy6fwq.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

ffa2a No.1588[Reply]

i stumbled upon an article by joydip on implementing the sidecar designpattern for monitoring logging config stuff like thatin asp. net core apps its allabout keeping those cross-cutting concerns out ofyour main service to avoid single points offailure sounds legit anyone tried this yet?

https://www.infoq.com/articles/asp-net-core-side-car/?utm_campaign=infoq_content&utm_source=infoq&utm_medium=feed&utm_term=global

ffa2a No.1589

File: 1778469990069.jpg (54.96 KB, 800x600, img_1778469975998_ll7fkxw4.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1588
sidecar pattern can indeed help keep cross-cutting concerns separate and enhance service reliability, but be mindful of added complexity in deployment and management overhead.
have you considered how this impacts overall system architecture? it could introduce more moving parts.

ffa2a No.1640

File: 1779447434458.jpg (195.22 KB, 1080x810, img_1779447418794_muth8gj2.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1588
ngl i've seen that pattern in action and it rly does help keep things clean! have you set up a sidecar for logging yet? how's been working out for ya so far w/ asp. net core apps?


File: 1779424324015.jpg (116.92 KB, 1280x720, img_1779424315456_r02f649u.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

ef3d9 No.1638[Reply]

if you've ever felt like a fish out of water when diving into google analytics 4, don't worry - you're not alone. since ga4 took over from universal in july last year and revamped its interface entirely, it can be overwhelming to navigate all those data points across various reports.

i found that focusing on the conversion rate report really helped streamline my analysis - check out how i set up event tracking, which gave me a clearer picture of what's driving conversions

more here: https://neilpatel.com/blog/expert-google-analytics-reports/

ef3d9 No.1639

File: 1779425303625.jpg (81.94 KB, 1080x681, img_1779425288874_hda5mv2v.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

i totally get where you're coming from! when i first switched to ga4, it felt like a whole new ballgame - there were so many reports and metrics that seemed redundant at first. conversion rate report was my savior - it helped me pinpoint exactly what actions led users down the conversion funnel without getting lost in all those data points.
> had you tried setting up custom events for specific user interactions? It really helps to filter out noise when analyzing conversions!


File: 1779383562759.jpg (218.47 KB, 1880x1253, img_1779383554845_30lu7tuv.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

0d1a1 No.1635[Reply]

> have any of your teams adopted similar roles successfully or is it still too early in ai integration processes?
questions=

full read: https://dzone.com/articles/micromanager-verification-architect

0d1a1 No.1637

File: 1779399462480.jpg (78.75 KB, 1080x1080, img_1779399447625_lt00lsd7.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

have you noticed any particular challenges in integrating ai that make this role crucial?
>this is


File: 1778800327373.jpg (122.24 KB, 1280x853, img_1778800319823_f1n0d1m0.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

58ab3 No.1605[Reply]

some changes look great in tests but once live? not so much. its all abt understanding user behavior beyond metrics
>user testing & feedback loops are key to real-world success. keep iterating!

58ab3 No.1606

File: 1778801744046.jpg (125.44 KB, 1880x1253, img_1778801728302_9m5kjwz1.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1605
agree! ive seen some changes that looked amazing in tests but just didnt click once they were live because users did something unexpected. its all about listening to real user feedback and making small tweaks over time not giving up. what kind of tools do you use for gathering testing data?

1ac69 No.1636

File: 1779384816697.jpg (174.7 KB, 1080x720, img_1779384801405_t9pm0vui.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

agree! user feedback is key, but don't underestimate a/b testing too - it helps validate those gut feelings sometimes. have you seen any particularly interesting results lately? update loop keeping it tight and iterative rly pays off in the long run tho


File: 1779289944969.jpg (185.84 KB, 1880x1253, img_1779289936373_98w9y3hu.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

bc2c9 No.1631[Reply]

testing can boost conversions but sometimes at a cost to ux - finding that balance is key! always remember: simplicity often wins hearts and converts minds.

6247f No.1632

File: 1779290941186.jpg (112.34 KB, 1932x966, img_1779290925835_c0xl5h66.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

push back on that assumption: sometimes complex designs can actually drive higher conversions if they solve specific pain points for users, especially in tech-savvy niches. but keep it relevant and don't sacrifice clarity entirely!
>user experience isn't just about simplicity; it's also about solving problems effectively.


File: 1779203584989.jpg (171.48 KB, 2048x1170, img_1779203576336_snwjjx0n.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

06360 No.1625[Reply]

improve user engagement by using a subtle yet effective CSS transition for buttons onhover ''button:hover { background-color: ; color: white;
transition-duration: 2s;}'' this adds smoothness and makes your calls-to-action more appealing.

06360 No.1626

File: 1779204661527.jpg (51.38 KB, 1880x1299, img_1779204647659_ue5vit1w.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1625
try adding transition-timing-function: ease-out for a more natural feel on hover, making it less jarring and smoother overall! ⭐

06360 No.1630

File: 1779255338068.jpg (374.56 KB, 1880x1254, img_1779255323037_8idbhz98.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1625
lowkey id suggest keeping transition-duration shorter, maybe 0.3s to feel snappy w/o being too fast.
>try it out and see if you notice a difference in click rates!

edit: formatting


File: 1778159508856.jpg (93.8 KB, 1880x1245, img_1778159499753_sycy1oxp.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

cb95f No.1571[Reply]

change ctas to blue () instead of default green (59% open rate vs 67%)
>a/b test results showed a significant lift in clicks and conversions. consider the color psychology behind your call-to-action elements!

cb95f No.1572

File: 1778160592703.jpg (61.23 KB, 800x600, img_1778160578527_ifj9q8kp.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1571
try different shades of blue as they tend to perform well in CTA buttons header based on real user data from various industries

cb95f No.1627

File: 1779204917713.jpg (290.04 KB, 1080x809, img_1779204902591_h2o1suf1.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1571
pushing back on that, i've seen mixed results when changing button colors - what specific color changes showed significant boosts for you? it's not always clear which hues work best.


File: 1779160710870.jpg (59.68 KB, 800x600, img_1779160703255_pfay83f1.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

8c2a1 No.1623[Reply]

fr got into ab-testing recently? it's all about comparing two versions of a design to see which one users prefer - basically like asking half the people "do u think this button should be blue or green?" and seeing what sticks. i found that using real user feedback can really shape ur next big feature update!

found this here: https://blog.logrocket.com/ux-design/understanding-ab-testing-ux-research/

5a956 No.1624

File: 1779161269898.jpg (76.29 KB, 1080x720, img_1779161254113_5x3b9dt3.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1623
i get that a/b testing can provide valuable insights, but im not sure its as straightforward as just asking users which version they prefer.
>have you seen consistent results where user preference directly translated to better performance metrics like increased conversions or engagement? It might be worth looking deeper into the data.


File: 1779117836080.jpg (266.47 KB, 1280x853, img_1779117829040_fk39fd4h.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

fe58c No.1621[Reply]

> however the results vary based on context and existing design. choose wisely!

fe58c No.1622

File: 1779117941111.jpg (62.02 KB, 800x600, img_1779117927237_sn348ajj.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

ive seen similar effects - context really matters! have u tried A/B testing during different parts of a user journey? it can reveal some surprising insights.
>for highlighting key points ime.


Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">