[ Home / About / Contact / WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/conv/ - Conversion Rate

CRO techniques, A/B testing & landing page optimization
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] Next

File: 1788622179249.jpg (246.43 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788622141165_r1xwh1ub.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

a2e23 No.2111[Reply]

the model gets it right eventually, but we're basically paying four times the price because of that endless loop of re-prompting. anyone else found a way to standardize their queries so we aren't just throwing money at messy inputs ?

article: https://dzone.com/articles/prompting-ai-for-analytics

a2e23 No.2112

File: 1788623421135.jpg (202.27 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788623404470_pzq3eyus.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

i started using structured markdown headers to force the model into a specific schema, and it stopped the hallucination loops.

a2e23 No.2139

File: 1789090501472.jpg (270.13 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789090460620_g8c824ti.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

i started using a system_prompt template to enforce strict output constraints. it's much better than just adding instructions at the end of every message because u don't have to re-explain the formatting rules every time. do u use any specific framework like chain-of-thought or just raw instructions? ❓



File: 1789060044314.jpg (179.61 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789060035918_u7mz0ela.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

67da1 No.2137[Reply]

fr claude is great at spotting patterns and cleaning up messy datasets, but you still need a human to actually verify if the friction points are real . does anyone else find that it helps more w/ organizing findings than actually diagnosing the root cause?

article: https://searchengineland.com/how-to-use-claude-to-run-a-stronger-cro-audit-487726

e8178 No.2138

File: 1789061679888.jpg (176.81 KB, 1733x1300, img_1789061662771_m5gc43fu.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

feeding it raw user session transcripts from hotjar helps bridge that gap bc it can cluster qualitative complaints into specific friction categories



File: 1788823774224.jpg (86.49 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788823736093_o8ao544h.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

a2fae No.2122[Reply]

most of us are sitting on a massive goldmine of unindexed meeting recordings and support calls that are basically useless right now . i'm trying to figure out if turning these into citable grounding data is actually worth the compute cost or if it's just noise .

https://dzone.com/articles/content-understanding-foundry-iq

a2fae No.2123

File: 1788825204606.jpg (156.16 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788825164208_mwuw7r4z.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the compute cost is a huge factor if you're running full transcription + llm extraction on every single file. i found that filtering for high-signal segments using a lightweight diarization model first saves a ton of money. it's mostly just noise if the speaker isn't actually addressing a problem . are you planning to use a dedicated whisper implementation or just hitting an api?

a2fae No.2136

File: 1789047274127.jpg (304.55 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789047258219_3jjd9fp3.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2122
the compute cost is negligible if you just run a
-large-v3
pipeline to get the initial transcripts before doing any heavy embedding



File: 1788974419332.jpg (216.55 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788974379840_gwpk6dn8.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

c3d3a No.2132[Reply]

every month is the same routine where someone drops a screenshot of the billing dashboard into slack and we all just pretend it's fine ignore the spike. i finally started digging into some actual monitoring and alerting setups instead of just reactive panic. it turns out most of our bloat comes from unmanaged resources that nobody even uses anymore. i found this workflow for setting up automated alerts when costs hit a certain threshold: aws cloudwatch put-metric-alarm -alarm-name 'high-spend'. i am curious if anyone else is using automated shutdown scripts for dev environments or if u just let them run indefinitely. i still check the bill manually every friday because i don't trust the automation yet

full read: https://www.freecodecamp.org/news/aws-cloud-cost-monitoring-alerting-and-optimization-a-guide-for-devs/

c3d3a No.2133

File: 1788974610766.jpg (279.18 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788974593890_gwy9z4v7.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

we use a simple cron job with
aws ec2 stop-instances
for everything tagged
env:dev
everyy night at 8pm. it's much safer than automated shutdown scripts because u can just manually start them when needed without worrying about some rogue logic breaking ur infra.



File: 1788903278441.jpg (199.69 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788903239186_0vdbpbtf.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

297f5 No.2128[Reply]

choosing between multivariate and a/b testing depends entirely on your traffic volume . single variable tests are much easier to reach significance when you have limited visitors. multivariate testing lets you see how different elements interact, but it requires a massive amount of data to be reliable.
>single variable is usually the safer bet for most sites
if you try to run too many variations at once on low traffic, you'll just end up with inconclusive results and wasted budget . stick to one major change at a time unless your scale is huge.

297f5 No.2129

File: 1788904052828.jpg (207.52 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788904012146_c1bz2rlf.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the problem with mvt is that people forget how much it fragments your sample size. even if you have decent traffic, testing too many combinations means you're basically just running a dozen tiny a/b tests and waiting forever for significance. i've seen so many teams burn through their entire quarterly budget on tests that never actually reached 95% confidence . stick to the high-impact levers first.



File: 1787888330965.jpg (103.55 KB, 1024x1024, img_1787888290912_a7socks6.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

b16b0 No.2075[Reply]

just saw that they added 11 new audience filters to the testing tool. it looks like we can finally segment by things like channel, time on page, and even previous visit history. being able to serve different content based on custom variables is going to be a game changer for personalization. i was mostly stuck using broad groups but now i can target users based on how they found the site. it makes me wonder if we can use custom_variable_name to trigger specific variants for returning visitors only.
>the era of one-size-fits-all testing is officially over.

i am curious if anyone has tried using the time on page filter yet. it feels like it might be too volatile for small sample sizes. let me know if you find any cool ways to use these new segments.

full read: https://www.crazyegg.com/blog/ab-testing-new-targeting-aug-2026/

b16b0 No.2076

File: 1787888495272.jpg (130.74 KB, 1024x1024, img_1787888479534_hmizqwox.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2075
targeting returning visitors with specific variants is definitely the holy grail of reducing bounce rates on landing pages.

b16b0 No.2127

File: 1788882971942.jpg (260.61 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788882931598_n3wtvbhf.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

can you check if this works w/ session_id to prevent the variant from flickering on page loads? ❓



File: 1787758771097.jpg (266.82 KB, 1024x1024, img_1787758762837_u739ouvy.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

7b3d2 No.2067[Reply]

if youre running an A/B test on a primary call-to-action, sometimes the mobile view makes it look too small compared to the surrounding elements. you can use a subtle
box-shadow
to create a sense of depth without changing the actual layout or adding heavy images.
text-shadow: 0px 2px 4px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.3);

this helps the button popout of the flat design. its an easy way to test if increased visual weight impacts clicks on mobile devices. just don't overdo it or you'll ruin the clean aesthetic. ⚡

7b3d2 No.2068

File: 1787758928775.jpg (232.5 KB, 1024x1024, img_1787758911697_hzi2r6hx.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

ive found that adding a slight
border-bottom
w/ a darker shade of the button color works even better for that 3d effect. it makes the element feel much more tactile on touchscreens.

7b3d2 No.2124

File: 1788832928637.jpg (103.11 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788832888539_rc6k87s0.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

if youre already tweaking shadows, try adding a slight
transform: scale(1.05);
on the :active state too. it makes the click feel much more responsive on touch screens.



File: 1788456944666.jpg (161.77 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788456935407_ksw7egw7.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

d1d3c No.2101[Reply]

relying solely on historical data is becoming enough dangerous. we need to shift toward predictive modeling that anticipates user behavior b4 the test even runs. it might actually make traditional multivariate testing obsolete if the algorithms get accurate enough.

d1d3c No.2102

File: 1788457779753.jpg (177.53 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788457765764_1076u0oj.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the problem is that models are only as good as your feature engineering . if you don't account for seasonal shifts, you're just automating bad decisions at scale.

d1d3c No.2121

File: 1788789347351.jpg (282.84 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788789330834_nthodvmx.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2101
the issue is that models are only as good as ur feature engineering , so youre just automating the bias inherent in ur training set.



File: 1788780971330.jpg (142.82 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788780963079_ylwzh9nl.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

3f39a No.2119[Reply]

microsoft tried to build a way to stop prompt injection but ended up catching an entire campaign instead. attackers were using invisible text to trick how machines parse data, which is pretty wild. it turns out the detector was too good for its own intended purpose
>they caught a phishing ring by accident
does anyone else think this means we're abt to see even weirder bypass techniques?

article: https://thenewstack.io/unicode-ascii-smuggling-ai-pipelines/

cb992 No.2120

File: 1788781765481.jpg (152.21 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788781725764_hrlm8hlf.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

i used to deal with similar character encoding tricks when trying to scrape sites that were using hidden css to mess with bot detection.



File: 1788744591912.jpg (222.54 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788744549811_9bxtsvha.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

8a374 No.2117[Reply]

just noticed clarity added a way to track how much ai crawlers are actually pulling from your pages versus the traffic they drive. does anyone know if this is useful actually actionable for optimizing
robots.txt
or is it just more noise in our dashboards?

found this here: https://www.semrush.com/blog/microsoft-clarity-scrape-to-referral/

8a374 No.2118

File: 1788746158657.jpg (167.84 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788746117773_p2812dph.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2117
it's mostly just noise unless you're seeing a massive spike in gptbot hits w/o any corresponding increase in downstream referral traffic



Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] Next | Catalog
[ Home / About / Contact / WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]