[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/conv/ - Conversion Rate

CRO techniques, A/B testing & landing page optimization
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

File: 1788579195970.jpg (147.43 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788579184819_q3r72eng.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

98036 No.2108[Reply]

everyone is getting lost in the weeds of tracking button clicks and scroll depth instead of focusing on actual revenue. we spend weeks perfecting a tiny UI tweak only to realize it has zero impact on the bottom line. i think most of these small wins are just vanity metrics designed to make reports look busy. if u aren't measuring how these changes affect the total checkout value, u are essentially flying blind.
>the data is lying to you
it is easy to get trapped in a loop of testing insignificant elements because it feels safe. testing a color change is much less risky than questioning ur entire product offering or pricing strategy. we need to move away from this incrementalism mindset and start looking at bigger structural changes. most small tests are just noise . instead of tweaking the css, try analyzing why users drop off during the shipping selection phase.
the real priority
focus on the friction points that actually prevent a completed transaction. if you want to automate some basic visibility tracking, use something like
window.dataLayer.push({'event': 'conversion_start'});
but don't let the numbers distract you from the core business problem. stop optimizing for clicks and start optimizing for profit

98036 No.2109

File: 1788579946036.jpg (181.39 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788579929380_wanel2o2.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the problem is that micro-conversions are often just leading indicators for when your tracking setup is broken. if you arent seeing a downstream impact on aov or conversion rate, the metric is useless. focus on building a correlation matrix btwn those clicks and actual revenue to see which ones actually matter.



File: 1788190178577.jpg (322.76 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788190169389_wglntb6k.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

a4f75 No.2089[Reply]

lately i have been tracking how high-fidelity imagery affects mobile conversion rates. we used to assume that a massive, beautiful banner was the key to engagement. instead, i am seeing much higher retention when we use simplified layouts with minimal visual noise. users seem to be developing a sort of banner blindness toward anything that looks too much like an advertisement. it is almost as if they are subconsciously scanning for utility rather than aesthetics.
>the more complex the visual, the harder the user has to work to find the value proposition.
this shift suggests that our focus on brand storytelling might be accidentally creating friction. i started testing a version with a plain background and just
font-weight: 700;
for the headline. it felt risky to remove the lifestyle photography, but the clarity was undeniable. the bounce rate actually dropped because the path to the cart became obvious. we should stop overcomplicating the initial viewport and focus on quick scannability.

a4f75 No.2090

File: 1788191563746.jpg (165.76 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788191523326_lvkd4hyr.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the "scanning for utility" part is spot on. i've noticed that when we stripped back the hero assets on our checkout flow, the friction actually decreased because users stopped trying to interpret the imagery and just looked at the inputs. it feels like there's a growing fatigue with anything that looks like a high-budget lifestyle shoot. the more polished it looks, the more it feels like an ad for something you didn't ask for . are u seeing this trend hold true across all categories, or is it specific to certain product types?

a4f75 No.2107

File: 1788566302055.jpg (164.01 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788566261256_dans4s95.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2089
it's basically just cognitive load reduction; once you strip away the fluff, the user's eye goes straight to the cta



File: 1788536328531.jpg (173.33 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788536289299_d5ao2ftu.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

aa2c0 No.2105[Reply]

is it even worth the complexity of multivariate tests if u can't isolate the winning element, or should we just stick to simple a/b iterations ? ➡ most people just drown in the noise

aa2c0 No.2106

File: 1788536489889.jpg (140.61 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788536474816_05cjw9on.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

tried running an mvt on a high-traffic landing page once and ended up with nothing but uninterpretable data . stick to single variables unless u have massive volume and a veryy specific hypothesis about element interaction.



File: 1788499738496.jpg (86.75 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788499728752_0cmk7nce.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

a650f No.2103[Reply]

found this list of alternatives for when hotjar feels a bit too basic . anyone else using something more advanced for heatmaps, or is **anyone actually moving away from hotjar entirely

full read: https://www.crazyegg.com/blog/hotjar-alternatives/

e981d No.2104

File: 1788501113614.jpg (136.01 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788501097606_qg5kmk24.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

switched to posthog bc we needed session replay integrated directly w/ our actual product analytics rather than just having a standalone heatmap tool.



File: 1788420570853.jpg (112.24 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788420531828_um6v00xv.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

5abfb No.2099[Reply]

noticed that users are dropping off during the shipping selection step on mobile. it seems like the default shipping method is too hidden behind a dropdown menu. switching to radio buttons might fix this since it makes the choice immediately visible w/o extra taps

5abfb No.2100

File: 1788422071755.jpg (103.34 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788422031819_jgvu348p.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

radio buttons are def better, but make sure u also pre-select the cheapest option by default. if they still gotta tap a button to confirm their choice, u havent actually removed the friction.



File: 1788370779024.jpg (257.8 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788370740843_8bi9r1hf.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

53748 No.2097[Reply]

i noticed that removing the zip code validation step actually caused more errors during shipping calculation. people assume less friction is always better, but adding a small layer of validation helps prevent downstream issues in the funnel. it seems like users prefer clearer guidance even if it adds an extra click to the process.
>less steps does not always equal higher conversion
sometimes you need more guardrails to keep data clean

53748 No.2098

File: 1788370960644.jpg (161.68 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788370945995_90zue7it.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

i had a similar issue w/ address autocomplete where it was pulling incorrect unit numbers. we ended up forcing an 'address verification' modal that requires the user to confirm their details manually. it felt like more work, but it dropped our order cancellation rate significantly bc of bad shipping data.



File: 1788096922536.jpg (174.97 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788096885269_5djwiib5.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

b696b No.2085[Reply]

the recent shift towards one-page checkouts seems to be creating a false sense of speed for users. while it reduces clicks, i've notcied that adding clear progress indicators actually helps prevent drop-off during the payment stage. removing all friction can sometimes lead to accidental orders and higher refund rates

b696b No.2086

File: 1788097829419.jpg (126.24 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788097789031_zgh2e04n.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

ngl ive found that adding a final order summary with a clear "review items" step significantly cuts down on those accidental clicks.

b696b No.2096

File: 1788364458995.jpg (155.64 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788364418510_8jfg13lr.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the accidental order issue is real, especially on mobile where a single misplaced tap triggers the final charge. ive seen way more support tickets for unintended purchases when the 'pay now' button is too close to other elements. are you seeing this specifically with one-tap payment methods like apple pay or just standard credit card forms?



File: 1788334200658.jpg (158.6 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788334160525_tuuvijyh.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

64ad0 No.2095[Reply]

Learn where the platforms align, where controls and reporting differ, and how to test AI features without disrupting campaign performance.

article: https://searchengineland.com/google-vs-microsoft-ai-max-486296


File: 1788226758294.jpg (151.25 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788226720608_vy1k5y0c.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

e1eef No.2091[Reply]

let's try to improve click-through rates by rewriting only the button labels on our primary ctas. pick one low-traffic page and replace your current text with something more benefit-driven or urgent.
>no more "submit" or "learn more"
the goal is to see if specific verbs outperform generic ones

e1eef No.2092

File: 1788226915205.jpg (156.79 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788226899784_cycd5duh.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

did this last quarter for a SAAS landing page where we swapped "get started" for claim your free trial. the click volume stayed roughly the same but the lead quality shifted because people actually understood the value prop before clicking. sometimes being tooo aggressive with urgency backfires and just makes the brand look spammy.
>the friction is usually in the next step, not the button
if the form following the button is a nightmare, no amount of clever micro-copy will save your conversion rate. i've seen "get my discount" buttons lead to massive bounce rates because the checkout flow was broken. are you planning to run these as A/B tests or just one-off swaps?



File: 1788140086560.jpg (121.02 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788140077952_s1kdq7ie.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

98176 No.2087[Reply]

everyone is moving toward single-variable tests bc the noise in modern analytics is becoming impossible to filter. trying to isolate interaction effects across dozens of elements feels like chasing ghosts lately. it seems like we are all just reverting back to simple a/b tests to find anything statistically significant at all.
>the era of complex experimentation is ending
some people argue that multivariate testing was always an overhyped way to burn budget w/o real-world impact. if u cannot isolate the primary driver, u are just gambling w/ ur traffic. we should probably focus more on qualitative user feedback instead of relying solely on automated scripts like window. addEventListener('click', callback); to tell us what is happening.

98176 No.2088

File: 1788148433606.jpg (145.72 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788148417941_93uiilui.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2087
ran a massive mvt last quarter on our checkout flow and it was a total disaster . we spent weeks configuring the combinations only to realize the sample size split made the results completely useless for anything other than the primary button color.
>the noise is real

stuck to simple a/b tests since then because i'd rather have one clear winner than a spreadsheet full of inconclusive junk.



Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">