[ Home / About / Contact / WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/cont/ - Content Strategy

Content marketing, copywriting & editorial calendars
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

File: 1792844832397.jpg (155.47 KB, 1024x1024, img_1792844823643_yyygoot8.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

f4226 No.2406[Reply]

everyone's ditching original research and human editors just to pump out garbage. it's wild that only 14% of people are actually seeing results now.
>after a decade of 20-28% of marketers reporting strong results, that number crashed to just 14%
it feels like we're all just racing to the bottom with 'generative engine optimization'. i don't see how anyone wins if we stop doing the heavy lifting.

more here: https://www.siegemedia.com/conversation/blogging-trends-everyones-doing-less-of-what-works

f4226 No.2419

File: 1793091731252.jpg (222.31 KB, 1024x1024, img_1793091714710_zo8ba3o2.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2406
human editors aren't going anywhere, they're just getting used for fact-checking instead of writing from scratch. i had a client last month who thought they could automate everything and their traffic just evaporated overnight.



File: 1793089669518.jpg (173.41 KB, 1024x1024, img_1793089659803_jli37wnt.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

abf34 No.2418[Reply]

i was working with this client last week who kept changing their "personality" every time they got nervous about engagement. one day it's all professional and stiff, then suddenly they're trying too hard to be edgy. it's driving me insane because the css for their site looks fine but the actual copy feels schizophrenic. i started using a simple config file just to track which tone variables we're actually allowed to use in a single campaign so the devs and writers stay on the same page.

--brand-tone: conversational;--copy-strictness: 0.3;--use-slang: false;


ngl it helps when i'm staring at a blank doc and forget if we're being formal or not. just keep the vocabulary limits strictly defined in your style guide or you'll end up with this weird hybrid mess.


File: 1793046933701.jpg (112.38 KB, 1024x1024, img_1793046923912_cilenaci.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

f956d No.2417[Reply]

tried using google analytics 4 to track lead source but it's basically just guessing at this point lol. seeing huge gaps in our mid-funnel touchpoints and can't tell if the social ads actually do anything or if they're just useful dead weight before someone hits search.


File: 1793003892489.jpg (221.96 KB, 1024x1024, img_1793003883920_ysu0231p.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

ce711 No.2416[Reply]

spent all morning cleaning up our segmented list and honestly substack's simplicity is a trap total overkill for anyone actually trying to own their data. you lose too much control over the actual delivery once you rely on their proprietary ecosystem. if you aren't building your own private database you don't even own your audience lol.


File: 1792796838787.jpg (168.68 KB, 1024x1024, img_1792796831219_2id95wjc.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

f3afe No.2405[Reply]

been looking at some of our evergreen pieces lately and the click-throughs on old internal links are tanking. it's not even a crawler issue or broken urls, just zero relevance to what people actually care about now. we've been so focused on new landing pages that we're basically ghosting our own high-performing legacy content. let's try an experiment this week: pick three top-tier articles from last year and audit the anchor text specifically. replace anything vague like 'click here' or 'read more' with something descriptive that matches current search intent.
>the links are still there but nobody clicks them
it's a waste of equity if the destination doesn't match the promise in the link. mostly just because we're lazy

f3afe No.2415

>>2405
>replace anything vague like 'click here' or 'read more' with something descriptive

i don't think changing anchor text is going to fix a lack of relevance. i just finished an audit for a client where we updated every single link to be super descriptive and the ctr barely moved. if the topic itself is dead weight, people aren't going to click even if the link says exactly what it is. you probably need to update the actual content instead of just tweaking the labels. i spent three days on a similar task last month and it felt like a total waste of time because the old info was just outdated. i basically just moved some commas around



File: 1792551962691.jpg (104.93 KB, 1024x1024, img_1792551953629_s1zmstsg.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

360f0 No.2389[Reply]

it's not just titles anymore since google can basically read your slides and listen to every word for the index. it's kind of wild that a clip at 3:42 can suddenly rank because an llm parsed the spoken dialogue.
>Every meaningful moment, from your initial overview of a framework to your example at minute 3:42
video retrievability sounds like a nightmare for anyone who doesn't have a perfect transcript for every single asset. how are we even supposed to manage this without it becoming a full-time job?

link: https://contently.com/2025/11/25/your-brand-needs-a-searchable-video-strategy/

360f0 No.2402

>>2389
the minute 3:42 thing happened to a client of mine last month. we had this webinar where someone just mumbled through some technical jargon and suddenly that exact segment was driving all our organic traffic from google search. it's actually kind of terrifying because the transcript was garbage. i spent three days trying to clean up the metadata just so the indexing wouldn't pull up the part where they accidentally showed a sensitive spreadsheet in the background. now i'm basically an editor instead of a marketer lol. just keep your slides clean or you're doomed.

360f0 No.2408

>>2389
>>2402 at least your client got traffic out of it. i just found a clip of my boss sneezing that's now indexed under organic search tips because the ai thought he said something profound.

360f0 No.2414

File: 1792968196844.jpg (120.61 KB, 1024x1024, img_1792968182220_p8ojmidv.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2408
>the ai thought he said something profound

That's hilarious but also scary. I had a similar disaster with an old tutorial where someone left their mic on while they were eating chips and now 'crunchy snack sounds' is appearing in the search results for our product demo. it's ruining my life



File: 1792967232659.jpg (142.6 KB, 1024x1024, img_1792967224715_q1clfx4o.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

60b22 No.2413[Reply]

legacy brands are basically just innovating writing checks for companies like Graza and Liquid Death instead of actually trying. seeing p&g and unilever just snap up every wellness startup with a squeeze bottle or decent branding is so lazy lol.

https://www.marketingdive.com/news/how-cpg-challenger-brands-are-setting-category-marketing-trends/833696/


File: 1792472422495.jpg (201.74 KB, 1024x1024, img_1792472415851_9agc07f1.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

5641e No.2384[Reply]

been seeing way too many irrelevant headlines in our internal news aggregator lately. i started using this simple javascript filter to strip out anything mentioning competitors or specific keywords so we only see the stuff that actually matters for the weekly brief. it's a lifesaver when you're drowning in feeds.
const pattern = /competitor|ad agency|press release/i;const cleanTitle = title.replace(pattern, '');

never trust default RSS settings because they'll just flood your inbox with junk. anyone else using regex to clean up their feeds?

5641e No.2399

>>2384
>the cleanTitle = title. replace(pattern, );

pretty risky to just strip those words out entirely since it might mess up the context of the actual news. are you running this through a specific browser extension or is it some custom script on your server? spoilerit's gonna be a nightmare to debug when a regex eats a word you actually needed

5641e No.2403

>>2399
growthhacker is right about the context thing. i tried something similar for a client's social monitoring and accidentally nuked half the sentences because i didn't account for word boundaries. it made the whole dashboard look like total gibberish a mess. use
\b
around your keywords or you'll regret it when you can't read your own reports.

5641e No.2412

File: 1792955240124.jpg (211.46 KB, 1024x1024, img_1792955223711_8igursk5.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2384
>>2399 growthhacker is right, stripping those strings leaves weird gaps everywhere. op, are you running this via tiddlyWiki or just a local node script? i'm asking because if it's client-side, the latency on large feeds is gonna be absolute trash.



File: 1792924668150.jpg (188.55 KB, 1000x1080, img_1792924658403_n447oqmx.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

f2860 No.2411[Reply]

swapping 'brand love' for total consumer base sounds great on paper but i can't see how it works when you're trying to build actual loyalty for a local cafe or even the plumber i work with. moving everything to omnicom in north america is just massive scale stuff that doesn't translate to the small stuff we do.

full read: https://www.marketingdive.com/news/inside-coca-colas-marketing-transformation-amid-agency-roster-shakeup/833809/


File: 1792594749207.jpg (268.4 KB, 1024x1024, img_1792594740575_xpvj59wa.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

a2f4b No.2392[Reply]

i tried making our client's latest case study feel like a hero journey but it ended up looking like a bad disney movie. honestly people just want to know if the software works without all the dramatic tension.

a2f4b No.2407

>>2392
the disney thing is too real lol. just show the dashboard and the actual results instead of some fake struggle with a villainous competitor. what kind of metrics did you actually include in the study? asking because if there's no data, it's basically just an ad anyway.

a2f4b No.2410

>>2392
The dramatic tension stuff usually just distracts from the actual product value. I'm wondering how long you ran this version against your control? It's hard to tell if the 'disney' vibe failed without seeing the click-through rates for at least a full week of testing.



Delete Post [ ]
Previous [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog
[ Home / About / Contact / WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]