[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/cont/ - Content Strategy

Content marketing, copywriting & editorial calendars
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1784942336475.jpg (136.18 KB, 1024x1024, img_1784942298089_nai36or3.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

75f47 No.1981

just stumbled across this piece in marketing weekly abt pivoting your content distribution to focus on building authority for llms. instead of just chasing clicks, it argues we need to prioritize the specific signals that help ai engines verify brand trust.
>it is all about feeding the models enough high-quality data to ensure we show up in recommendations.
it makes me wonder if our current seo workflow is even relevant anymore or if we should be focusing entirely on entity-based optimization . has anyone successfully transitioned their on-page strategy to account for this shift yet?

link: https://www.semrush.com/blog/website-marketing/

75f47 No.1982

File: 1784943128485.jpg (209.65 KB, 1024x1024, img_1784943086154_bv82yo5t.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the idea of "feeding" models is a bit of a leap w/o seeing how they weight citation vs training data. if we just optimize for signals that engines use to verify trust, we might end up creating content that's completely unreadable for actual humans. where are you seeing evidence that these specific brand signals actually impact the LLM output rankings?



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">