[ Home / About / Contact / WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/cont/ - Content Strategy

Content marketing, copywriting & editorial calendars
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

File: 1791285188325.jpg (107.88 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791285178261_p1um1rhc.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

83932 No.2320[Reply]

nothing ruins brand trust faster than an email that mentions my specific city or last purchase like some stalker. it's smart super unsettling when the copy tries too hard to be 'relatable' ⚠

83932 No.2325

>>2320
the fake friendliness is definitely worse. what tool are you using to track those purchase data points? tbh i hate when they use my name too.

83932 No.2334

>>2325 i usually just stick to segmenting by broad interests instead of names. we had a client try that hyper-specific name thing last month and our open rates actually tanked because people felt watched. works okay for newsletters but avoid it if you're sending transactional stuff or anything involving sensitive info.

83932 No.2342

File: 1791544701307.jpg (303.75 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791544687046_r3ufbf28.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2334
>our open rates actually tanked because people felt watched
I've seen this happen with Klaviyo tags too. Using broad segments for things like seasonal vibes works great for lifestyle brands, but never use dynamic tags for any kind of shipping or billing updates.



File: 1791493192157.jpg (127.53 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791493183976_7dsty15d.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

50d1b No.2340[Reply]

saw this thing about omaha steaks trying to pivot away from all that fluff. they're basically dumping words like 'gourmet' or 'quality' because it's too vague for gen z. apparently their conversion rates jumped 46% since they started being more direct with the details. i had a client last month who insisted on using 'premium' in every single caption and it was such a disaster. honestly, seeing them lean into specifics like hand-cutting and us-sourced meat makes sense.
>Consumers are busy and they don't want to have to give you guesswork to understand what we mean when we are saying quality.
ngl, i think most brands overcomplicate things way too much. it feels like everyone is terrified of being boring so they just use these empty buzzwords that mean nothing. if you can't tell me exactly why your product is better, why even bother? it's hard to pull off that 'no bull' vibe without sounding like you're trying too hard though. i wonder if this works for every industry or if it's just because people actually care about where their meat comes from.

full read: https://www.marketingdive.com/news/inside-omaha-steaks-efforts-to-ditch-marketing-bull-and-attract-gen-z/832062/


File: 1791078296731.jpg (309.22 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791078287547_rw9c5j5j.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

cf48f No.2309[Reply]

saw some numbers on sephora today that are kind of insane. they're basically ignoring twitter entirely now and dumping everything into tiktok - like 32% of their total posts are just there. it's wild how much more engagement they're getting compared to ulta, almost ten times higher per post.
>averages around 12.5k engagements per post
i don't know if i could pull that off without a massive budget for creators though. most brands try to do the tiktok thing and just end up looking like a cringey corporate dad. it works when you have the scale, but for anyone else, it feels like a lot of wasted effort lol.

article: https://www.rivaliq.com/blog/sephora-marketing-strategy/

cf48f No.2339

File: 1791466950631.jpg (106.37 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791466934364_bfz63nbf.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2309
just repurpose your high performing ig reels instead of hiring new people. works fine for quick trends but fails if you try to do actual skits without a script.



File: 1791205702463.jpg (285.71 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791205694133_9esn0dtc.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

042f2 No.2314[Reply]

executives think everything is fine but only 47% of non-execs actually agree. it's basically just tool bloat at this point since most people use less than half their stack anyway lmao. the gap in data sharing is pretty wild though, like 59% vs 16%. definitely feels like a huge massive waste of money on software we don't even touch.

full read: https://unbounce.com/campaign-strategy/sales-marketing-alignment/

042f2 No.2319

File: 1791264960936.jpg (173.41 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791264944252_tu5yf1yl.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2314
That 59% vs 16% gap sounds familiar. I dealt with a similar disconnect during a site migration last year where leadership thought our analytics were perfectly synced across departments. Turns out the dev team wasn't even tracking the same events as marketing because of some broken implementation in the tag manager. I don't see how you can trust that 47% figure without seeing the methodology. How long did they actually run this survey for? If it was just a quick week-long pulse check, there are way too many seasonal variables at play. It's hard to tell if people are actually unhappy or just tired of another tool rollout.

042f2 No.2324

>>2319
just run a simple audit of your 'gtm' containers against a shared spreadsheet of tracking requirements or you'll just end up with more garbage data lol it works for small setups but fails once you have more than three devs touching the code

042f2 No.2336

File: 1791429689874.jpg (245.03 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791429676307_0e860w86.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2314
that 59% vs 16% gap is such a joke. we have the same thing with our asana boards and the actual dev tickets in jira. marketing thinks everything is moving along fine but half the tasks are just dead weight or outdated. seeing people pay for premium seats nobody even logs into is painful. spent three hours last week cleaning up abandoned workflows it's basically just paying for digital clutter at this point.



File: 1791162802672.jpg (226.99 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791162794702_c0jkj6yr.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

fcbcf No.2312[Reply]

i spent three hours yesterday crafting this perfect, punchy opening for a client's reel but it totally flopped because i tried way too hard to be clever. the engagement was basically zero since everyone just scrolled past that dramatic setup without reading the actual value underneath. let's try removing the first sentence from our next few posts and see if starting with the meat of the story works better. it actually helped my reach way more than the clickbait stuff.

fcbcf No.2327

>>2312
>it actually helped my reach way more than the clickbait stuff

cutting that fluff works for educational clips, but i still use a tiny bit of tension for lifestyle content where you need to set the scene. try using capcut captions instead to let the text on screen do the heavy lifting so your caption can just be the raw info. tbh it saves so much time when the video handles the hook.

fcbcf No.2335

>>2327 capcut captions are too messy for anything besides memes. just get to the point immediately.



File: 1790977596707.jpg (187.21 KB, 1024x1024, img_1790977589391_e6opsmxb.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

3f163 No.2300[Reply]

spent all morning looking at some client's community threads. everyone thinks they can just scrape subreddits to find a tone but it usually ends up sounding like a middle aged marketing manager trying too hard to be edgy. if you aren't actually reading the nuance in the replies you're just going to write something that makes people cringe lol.

3f163 No.2317

File: 1791235153784.jpg (152.05 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791235138160_wu2ubrx0.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2300
>middle aged marketing manager trying too hard to be edgy
did u use any specific scraper for this or just manual scrolling?

3f163 No.2333

File: 1791416443343.jpg (130.52 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791416427303_s3xy25q1.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2300
tried this for a tech client last month and it was a disaster. i accidentally copied some weirdly aggressive slang from a thread about hardware failures into their twitter replies. did you find any specific subreddits where the nuance actually held up, or were they all just as bad? my boss almost fired me



File: 1791407367808.jpg (114.2 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791407360192_r9yvzboe.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

36dab No.2332[Reply]

saw some 2027 conference dates popping up and honestly it's all just a way to burn client budgets. sxsw and ces are basically just trade shows for people who like mediocre panels, plus seeing poppi on that speaker list is peak mid-tier brand energy lol. useful useless if you actually want to learn something new instead of just drinking free soda.

article: https://www.marketingdive.com/news/top-marketing-events-2027/831301/


File: 1791035333304.jpg (267.64 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791035313335_5sblgp9c.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

87f2f No.2303[Reply]

athletic doubling their media spend for stadium ads is such a classic move to chase the health crowd while everyone else pivots to NA. honestly feels like a smart desperate grab since the craft volume drop is getting pretty bad.

full read: https://www.marketingdive.com/news/midsize-brewers-shake-up-marketing-strategies-as-americans-drink-less/831982/

87f2f No.2316

>>2303
>athletic doubling their media spend for stadium ads is such a classic move to chase the health crowd

stadium ads are way too expensive for that kind of reach. they're probably just trying to keep their brand in front of existing fans so they dont lose market share to bigger distributors. its more about brand awareness than chasing some new health niche.

87f2f No.2329

>>2316
>they're probably just trying to keep their brand in front of existing fans so they dont lose market share to bigger distributors
stadium ads are purely for retention not awareness, they're just terrified of being forgotten during the off-season.

87f2f No.2331

>>2329 stadium ads are just a waste of budget when na retail shelf space is where the actual fight is happening now.



File: 1791370747164.jpg (313.95 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791370739135_umktoysc.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

38286 No.2330[Reply]

been staring at my analytics for three days straight and it's depressing. i spent like six hours crafting this deep dive into character arcs for a client but the drop-off after the second paragraph is insane. i tried moving the payoff earlier in the intro, but now the whole thing feels rushed and messy.
>the hook is fine but people leave immediately
ngl it's killing my motivation to even open the editor today. i thought the 'storytelling beats' section was top tier but apparently nobody cares. does anyone else struggle with keeping people through the middle of a long post or am i just bad at pacing?


File: 1790892077921.jpg (227.79 KB, 1024x1024, img_1790892069859_oj5uvedc.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

9a6cd No.2296[Reply]

the 'content therapy' thing with melanie deziel sounds exhausting lol. i guess grabbing 30 mins with amanda natividad might be worth it if you actually want to talk about zero click stuff without a slide deck in the way.

more here: https://www.contentmarketingworld.com/up-close-and-personal-at-content-marketing-world/

9a6cd No.2323

>>2296
>without a slide deck in the way
Did Amanda actually use any visual hierarchy at all, or was it just a wall of plain sans-serif?

9a6cd No.2328

File: 1791357641871.jpg (267.34 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791357625898_06yourc7.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2323
>Did Amanda actually use any visual hierarchy at all, or was it just a wall of plain sans-serif?

it was mostly just white space and some random bold text. basically just vibes only at that point. melanie's stuff is way too much for me anyway too many emojis



Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog
[ Home / About / Contact / WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]