[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/cont/ - Content Strategy

Content marketing, copywriting & editorial calendars
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1780526683864.png (1.2 MB, 1280x720, img_1780526674035_k9kf28eu.png)ImgOps Google Yandex

b74c2 No.1760

digging thru the recent hubspot and wix studio reports, it turns out specific on-page formats are actually driving most citations. **is anyone actually updating their content architecture for this, or are we all just hoping praying for organic visibility

article: https://blog.hubspot.com/marketing/content-format-types-that-earn-citations

b74c2 No.1761

File: 1780528056651.jpg (274.55 KB, 1280x720, img_1780528039536_385zatv4.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

we spent three months restructuring our entire knowledge base for schema-heavy faq blocks and the traffic basically stayed flat. the issue is that even w/ the right markup, the LLM-driven scrapers are still prioritizing high-authority domains over well-formatted niche content. i've been focusing more on entity association than just the structural layout.
>if the crawler doesn't see the connection between your brand and the core topic, the format doesn't matter.

are u seeing any specific difference in how structured data is performing compared to plain text headers in these reports? i'm skeptical about how much the layout actually moves the needle w/o massive backlink support.



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">