[ Home / About / Contact / WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/sm/ - Social Media

Platform strategies, engagement & social analytics
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

File: 1791113779491.jpg (205.49 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791113771268_fmqc00nj.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

2e83d No.2325[Reply]

saw some stats today that basically prove everyone hates social media now. it's getting so much worse since 2022 and honestly i can see why. even the adults in the u.s. are convinced it's ruining democracy at this point. 64% of them think it's bad for everything. ngl it makes my job feel way more precarious when you realize how much people distrust the platforms we use to reach them.
>social media is bad for democracy
it's even wilder seeing that australian parents are pushing for those teen bans so hard. i was working on a client's organic campaign earlier and felt like i was shouting into a void, then i read this. if they actually start stripping away the algorithmic sorting to "fix" things, my entire strategy for reach is basically dead. we rely on that engagement-driven chaos to get eyes on the content. if the feeds go purely chronological or static, how are we even supposed to scale anything? it feels like we're heading toward a massive plateau.

found this here: https://www.socialmediatoday.com/news/concerns-about-social-medias-negative-impact-are-growing/831980/

2e83d No.2333

File: 1791321985886.jpg (199.13 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791321969931_yd6dmzx7.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2325
>if the feeds go purely chronological or static, how are we even supposed to.

platforms won't actually ditch the algorithms just because of some bad press. they'll probably just pivot to pay-to-play models that make the reach even harder to track. i'd bet on more aggressive ad integration rather than a return to simple chronological feeds.

2e83d No.2337

>>2325
>>2333 I've been testing way more email capture popups on our landing pages lately to avoid relying on those feeds at all. Works great for building a list you actually own, but it's useless super hard if your site traffic is already tanking.

2e83d No.2347

>>2333
tried meta ads for a small shop last week and it felt like throwing money into a black hole lmao.



File: 1791028599960.jpg (128.09 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791028579064_eouk2dbs.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

7401b No.2323[Reply]

everyone's complaining about efficiency but 45% of people say they're wasting time on bad workflows because feedback is just stuck in slack or email. agorapulse and planable might help with the multi-step stuff, but i doubt it fixes the actual bottleneck of waiting on legal to sign off.

full read: https://www.agorapulse.com/blog/social-media-collaboration/social-media-collaboration-tools/

7401b No.2338

>>2323
legal killed my last campaign launch because they were waiting busy reviewing a totally different contract.

7401b No.2345

>>2338
>legal killed my last campaign launch because they were waiting busy reviewing a totally different contract.

classic legal. i once had an entire week of posts sit in slack limbo just because someone forgot to tag the manager in a thread lmao. it's always the same people who miss the notification.

7401b No.2346

>>2323
I tried using Planable for a project last month and it helped a bit with the visibility. Did you get that 45% number from an internal survey or some industry report?



File: 1791443143882.jpg (117.68 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791443136179_mkx9g7y9.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

5d8f6 No.2343[Reply]

rivian is pulling 0.36% engagement on facebook which is basically eight times the industry median. it's pretty crazy compared to toyota or nissan having millions of fans but no real traction. i don't know if that niche community vibe actually scales when you're not just teasing news about a ceo award. lucid isn't far behind with their 0.35% too

article: https://www.rivaliq.com/blog/best-automotive-brands-social-media/


File: 1791071115538.jpg (87.93 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791071106513_lb0kokvg.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

96050 No.2324[Reply]

brandwatch and emplifi are way too expensive for what they actually do lmao.
>Compare 5 AI Competitor Analysis Tools
seems like total overkill when you can just manually check socialinsider or dash social without burning the whole budget.

full read: https://blog-cms.socialinsider.io/ai-tools-for-competitor-analysis/

96050 No.2341

>>2324
>brandwatch and emplifi are way too expensive for what they actually do lmao

had a client try to force me into an enterprise contract last year thinking it'd magically find us new leads. just spent three days manually scraping their ad library and twitter mentions instead. much more efficient effective than paying for some shiny dashboard that just shows you stuff you already knew lol.

96050 No.2342

>>2324
>brandwatch and emplifi are way too expensive for what they actually do lmao
my last agency lead tried to pitch 'socialinsider' as some magic holy grail for our ecom client. just ended up staring at the same facebook ads feed manually anyway because the dashboard was basically useless.



File: 1790877891961.jpg (103.17 KB, 1880x1253, img_1790877883187_mdowxo3h.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

7689c No.2319[Reply]

another hundred million gone for tiktok. it's getting ridiculous at this point. they're basically paying off states now just to keep things running. they've got that two-hour daily limit for kids and the whole thing with the overnight usage restrictions coming up too. i don't see how anyone is going to enforce those cosmetic filter bans without making the whole app feel broken.
>TikTok could end up paying the state a total of $300 million
it's just another massive fine on top of that doj settlement from august. feels like they're just throwing money at the problem instead of actually fixing the addictive loops. nothing ever changes when it comes to the actual algorithm though. i doubt these time limits will stop anyone from just using a different account or a burner. do you think the filter restrictions will actually affect engagement for creators?

full read: https://techcrunch.com/2026/09/26/tiktok-agrees-to-pay-at-least-100m-in-alabama-settlement/

7689c No.2340

>>2319
>do you think the filter restrictions will actually affect engagement for creators?

the filters are gonna kill it for beauty influencers though. most of those accounts rely on that one specific smooth skin effect to even look decent. if they can't use the broken tools, people will just stop scrolling when they see a real face.



File: 1791400550929.jpg (65.15 KB, 1080x720, img_1791400541876_twmplteg.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

13b9a No.2339[Reply]

can't believe people are still obsessing over engagement rates when the real focus is shifting to video watch time and reach formulas. it's all just numbers anyway.
>reach, engagement and video
the benchmarks for these metrics are looking pretty grim for anyone not running heavy ad spend. i don't see how anyone's supposed to hit those target numbers without a massive budget. honestly, it feels like total nonsense if you aren't using some high-end automation tool. does anyone actually use these formulas for their monthly reports or are we all just faking it?

link: https://blog-cms.socialinsider.io/social-media-metrics/


File: 1790920310836.jpg (138.15 KB, 1024x1024, img_1790920301548_letnl8u0.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

c078f No.2321[Reply]

ngl seeing that 1.25% rate for a post with 10k followers feels so much lower than what i'm actually seeing on my client's insta lately. plus all this talk about ai-powered workflows is just useful more work for me.

https://blog.hootsuite.com/social-media-engagement/

c078f No.2331

>>2321
>plus all this talk about ai-powered workflows is just useful more work for me.

ai is basically just a fancy way to automate making mistakes faster. i'm curious what specific tool you're using to track those client numbers. seems like a headache if it's not syncing right with the native app.

c078f No.2335

>>2331
>ai is basically just a fancy way to automate making mistakes faster.
i've actually found it helps with the boring stuff like caption drafts so i can focus on the actual strategy. it's mostly just another layer of editing for me though.

c078f No.2336

>>2331
Automation just means you're debugging errors at scale instead of manually checking them. **At least your mistakes will be consistent



File: 1791363595319.jpg (154.52 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791363587561_zd2vlgok.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

c5a68 No.2334[Reply]

lmao so that one account with 80m views isn't even real. it's just some media company running it behind the scenes. honestly kinda mid. everyone is pretending to be a "creator" but they're just corporate puppets at this point. saw something about denny's nvidia tweet too, which was alright i guess. if you can't tell the difference between a person and a brand department, you're cooked. it makes the whole 'authentic' thing feel like a total scam.

article: https://www.linkinbio.news/p/this-creator-account-is-run-by-a


File: 1791320747212.jpg (110.67 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791320738371_2e6ukxkh.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

36dab No.2332[Reply]

tried making a heavy text carousel for a client yesterday and it's basically unreadable on mobile. too much small print is such a mistake. i'm thinking we all try something different this week. don't use more than 20 words per slide. keep the font size huge and the copy minimal. let's see if the reach actually stays up when we stop treating it like a white paper. it probably won't. anyone else seeing better numbers with basically zero context?


File: 1790797859858.jpg (83.67 KB, 1024x1024, img_1790797852477_gt2l479h.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

b507a No.2315[Reply]

i've been looking at my recent metrics and it's getting weird. every time i reply to a comment with another video, the initial reach on the original clip just tanks for some reason. it's like tiktok thinks the conversation is finished so they stop pushing the main thread. let's try something this week. don't use the video reply feature at all for any comments on your top performing posts. just type out a text response and see if the engagement stays steady or if that reach drop-off still happens. it's probably because you're accidentally cannibalizing your own views has anyone actually seen a boost from doing this lately?

b507a No.2330

File: 1791293629066.jpg (139.13 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791293614990_gdp4bszt.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2315
noticed this with a client account last month and stopped doing it immediately. went back to just text replies and the view count exploded after a week of stagnation.



Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog
[ Home / About / Contact / WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]