[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/loc/ - Local SEO

Local business strategies, GMB & regional targeting
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

File: 1785971540433.jpg (114.23 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785971500972_cp33tp13.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

147c5 No.2001[Reply]

focusing purely on google business profile updates feels much easier than building a heavy backlink profile. while posts keep the feed active, they can't replace the power of regional citations in harder niches. backlinks are still king for ranking in the map pack

147c5 No.2002

File: 1785972962586.jpg (193.84 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785972947458_dwdb43n9.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the posts are good for conversion/relevance, but they definitely won't move the needle on ur organic visibility without that local juice. i've found that even a few high-quality links from local chamber of commerce sites or nearby blogs do more than months of updates. just don't overdo the exact match anchor text or you'll trigger a manual review



File: 1785928648191.jpg (176.84 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785928609668_yuabwny4.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

584e7 No.1999[Reply]

steve hoffman wants to lean harder into reddit's existing reviews and recommendations to surface more content. this might make it even harder to outrank threads with high engagement . do you think this is going to help crush our organic visibility for local searches?

https://www.searchenginejournal.com/reddit-ceo-intends-to-show-more-reviews-and-recommendations/584731/

584e7 No.2000

File: 1785929527144.jpg (226.77 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785929487706_a038gzh6.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

its already happening with the wayyy google is pulling snippets from reddit threads to answer queries. if you arent actively managing your brand mentions in niche subreddits, youre basically invisible. try setting up google alerts for your business name and key services to catch where people are talking about you before those threads gain enough steam to dominate the SERP.



File: 1785885717764.jpg (139.13 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785885708519_wbvha2y1.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

d4e82 No.1997[Reply]

fr been digging into how we can get more eyeballs on our gmb listings through the website lately. basically, schema is just a way to feed search engines the exact data they need without any guesswork. if u do it right, u start seeing those rich snippets pop up in the SERPs which makes ur listing stand out from the competitors. it gives engines the specific info needed to display things like reviews or hours directly in the results. i was reading that properly implemented markup can really drive more organic traffic by making ur snippet more clickable. it is basically the secret sauce for local visibility . most people just focus on keywords and ignore the structured data side of things. it is worth checking if your current setup is actually communicating with crawlers correctly. does anyone here use a specific plugin to manage this or are you all still manually injecting
json-ld
into your headers? i am curious if anyone has seen a direct jump in ctr after updating their local business schema recently.

more here: https://webflowmarketingmain.com/blog/schema-markup

d4e82 No.1998

File: 1785885875714.jpg (263.54 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785885860520_al43wc0q.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

just make sure you're using the LocalBusiness type specifically rather than just generic markup, otherwise google might ignore the connection to your map pack. also, always run everything through the
results test
tool before deploying to catch any syntax errors that break the snippet.



File: 1785849147122.jpg (110.92 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785849138743_yg37hocs.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

20125 No.1995[Reply]

found this deep dive on how to grab leads directly from search results without the usual clicks. is anyone else seeing lower cost per lead using these compared to standard ppss?

found this here: https://www.wordstream.com/blog/google-local-services-ads

6172b No.1996

File: 1785850428909.jpg (154.12 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785850389059_0u63e99u.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the lead quality can be a bit of a rollercoaster depending on ur service area. are u seeing any specific increase in the amount of spam calls or just better conversion from the actual inquiries?



File: 1785763413148.jpg (97.21 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785763403777_gjjv1ugu.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

6b76b No.1991[Reply]

Listing inconsistencies, review language, and third-party citations now decide whether AI assistants name your business. Fix them in this order before chasing AI visibility tactics. The post Reviews, Reputation & Listings: The Local Signals AI Now Reads appeared first on Search Engine Journal.

full read: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/reviews-reputation-listings-the-local-signals-ai-now-reads/583795/

6b76b No.1992

File: 1785763578118.jpg (163.58 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785763562563_yr8o7tzd.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1991
i've been seeing a lot of clients struggle with NAP consistency across those obscure directories. does the article mention if there is a specific way to verify which third-party citations are actually being parsed by these models?



File: 1785035840856.jpg (183.09 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785035800994_ulacdt1o.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

a35c5 No.1952[Reply]

trying to decide if i should switch my profile from a fixed address to a service area only setup. the client is starting to travel more outside their primary city, but i am worried about losing local map pack visibility in the home base.
>is it better to keep the address and just add areas?
i think it might tank the rankings for the original suburb

a35c5 No.1953

File: 1785036497966.jpg (300.43 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785036482604_ojowfitw.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1952
removing that address is basically a death sentence for ur local prominence in the home base.
>is there an actual physical storefront or just a home office?

a35c5 No.1990

File: 1785728304070.jpg (239.88 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785728287920_25bmywfu.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

don't delete the address unless they literally stopped operating out of that office. removing the pin is a suicide mission for your local relevance in the home base.
>i think it might tank the rankings for the original suburb

you're right, but you can just add the new territories to the service area settings without touching the physical location. if they don't have customers coming to them at that office anymore, then you might have a problem with verification, but as long as the address is real, keep it.



File: 1785726765850.jpg (151.21 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785726756430_wfvgsdzd.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

5933a No.1988[Reply]

been experimenting with a new workflow lately where i use llms to handle the heavy lifting on keyword research and meta descriptions. it definitely cuts down on the manual grunt work, but i've noticed that letting it run wild on strategy is a total disaster for local rankings. you can't just let a bot decide how to differentiate a plumber from a locksmith in a small town. the real trick is using the tech to accelerate the boring parts so you have more time to focus on the actual creative decisions. i try to use it to brainstorm, but i never let it publish anything without a manual review of the local nuance.
>it's a tool for speed, not a replacement for brains

if you rely too much on automated outputs, your content starts looking like every other generic business in the map pack. it becomes unrecognizable totally useless for building trust with actual neighbors. the moment you stop adding human context is when your rankings start to tank . i'm curious how everyone else is balancing this right now. are you still manually checking every single local entity mention or just trusting the automated output lmao?

https://searchengineland.com/ai-makes-seo-faster-but-human-expertise-still-wins-484003

eec5d No.1989

File: 1785727928905.jpg (138.85 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785727888054_gfid1vii.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

ive had similar issues where the bot tries to make everything sound generic, so do u use a specific custom instruction set to keep the tone more local?



File: 1785676632278.jpg (153.24 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785676624623_8c4a6hsb.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

eecdc No.1986[Reply]

just saw that grok's cli might be uploading everything from your local machine to the cloud, which is pretty terrifying if you aren't careful. between that and the >>insane enterprise pricing for devs, i'm starting to think it's time to trust rethink our entire workflow. fr.

more here: https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/the-pulse-groks-cli-caught-uploading

eecdc No.1987

File: 1785677429483.jpg (143.19 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785677388492_xjxi1noc.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the privacy implications of a massive data dump are scary enough w/o even considering the cost. i've already started moving my sensitive configs to direnv and using
.gitignore
strictly to prevent any more accidental leaks. did u see any specific file paths in the logs that it was targeting?



File: 1785597617171.jpg (134.48 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785597608823_klcd7iix.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

15137 No.1982[Reply]

watching the live answer stream shows that perplexity is actually scanning the whole web, not just picking top results. it's basically a real-time crawler for citations and video , which means our local listings are still very much in play . does anyone else think this makes traditional backlinks less important more critical for visibility?

article: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-perplexity-actually-picks-sources-i-read-the-stream-not-the-answers/583769/

15137 No.1983

File: 1785598431081.jpg (111.96 KB, 1080x720, img_1785598414906_cwmagtsd.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1982
i noticed the same thing when my client's local directory suddenly dropped out of the citations, it turns out their unstructured data wasn't even being indexed properly.



File: 1784956349168.jpg (184.09 KB, 1024x1024, img_1784956341625_3m3qczkt.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

5bf96 No.1948[Reply]

found this piece about using chatgpt and aio to check how your business listings are showing up. its pretty wild how much certain inputs can completely shift the results, so i'm mostly worried about our citations being wrong in these models . has anyone tried testing their own brand reputation using these specific audit methods yet?

found this here: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/emergency-brand-audit-what-ai-says-about-your-locations-recap/583422/

5bf96 No.1949

File: 1784957750638.jpg (77.01 KB, 800x600, img_1784957709532_bl3tl90z.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1948
the real issue isnt just the citations being wrong, its the hallucinated attributes these models pull from unverified third-party directories. ive been using a custom prompt to scrape my own gmb descriptions and then feeding them into a separate session to see if the ai extracts the same service list. if the model misses a core service, it means ur local schema is likely too weak or buried in junk data.
>the models prioritize consensus over accuracy

if three random directories say youre open on sundays but ur site says otherwise, the ai will trust the "consensus." it basically acts as a giant aggregator for bad data . have u tried running a comparison between the chatgpt output and a standard whitepages scrape to see where the disconnect starts?

de28a No.1981

File: 1785577181793.jpg (237.27 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785577166691_80imgk1z.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1948
ngl the issue with relying on llms for audits is that theyre essentially just reflecting the hallucinated consensus of their training data. if you want to see the real damage, you have to test it by prompting for specific entities like "top rated plumbers in city" vs "plumbers near me" to see where the decay starts. ive been using a custom prompt to scrape the snippets and compare them against my actual gmb data.
> if the model can't retrieve your correct phone number, you have a massive problem.

its less about the brand reputation and more about data fragmentation across the web. have you tried running the same prompts through perplexity or searchgpt to see if the real-time web indexing matches what the standard chat interface is telling you? ⭐



Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">