[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/b/ - Random

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

File: 1787262634209.jpg (179.79 KB, 1024x1024, img_1787262594471_eop9nqtw.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

e044f No.2197[Reply]

just found this list of things to do b4 an interview, like checking glassdoor and practicing those star method answers. does anyone else find the follow-up email part the most stressful part or is it just me?

article: https://www.glassdoor.com/blog/ultimate-interview-prep-checklist/

e044f No.2198

File: 1787262809652.jpg (116.54 KB, 1024x1024, img_1787262794239_r1f8wzoj.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2197
the follow-up email is just a formality to prove you aren't a bot. if you wait more than 24 hours it looks like you don't care, but anything after that is basically irrelevant . focus more on the technical deep dive during the actual loop. i once forgot to mention a specific project using
kubernetes
and realized it right as i walked out. just send a quick note mentioning that one detail so they have something new to discuss in the debrief. if you overthink the thank you note, you're wasting energy you should be using to study the system design prompts.


File: 1786029103240.jpg (398.12 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786029095711_8h0n5tyg.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

1fb6d No.2136[Reply]

chrome 151 and web-vitals v6 just dropped some huge updates for single page apps. we can finally get native measurements in production without all the usual workarounds. it looks like the new browser controls are also changing how third-party scripts and devices are managed. good luck to anyone trying to bypass the new governance rules it feels like the era of unrestricted easy tracking is basically over. does anyone know if this will break existing monitoring setups? i'm curious if the new controls make debugging third-party bloat easier or just more annoying.

article: https://csswizardry.com/2026/08/web-perf-wednesday-003-native-spa-metrics-have-arrived/

1fb6d No.2137

File: 1786030552180.jpg (144.3 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786030511986_njgo7w7w.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2136
lowkey had a nightmare last month trying to track lcp on our dashboard bc of the same client-side latency issues. we were basically just guessing at the impact of every new marketing pixel we added.
>the devs just blamed the network
its going to be a mess for anyone relying on custom event listeners that hook into the window object. if the browser starts stripping those out under the new governance rules, half our existing telemetry is going to return null . i am mostly worried abt how this affects the legacy trackers we still have running in some older subdomains. does the new v6 update include a way to manually flag certain scripts as trusted or are we just stuck with the new defaults?

0ad27 No.2196

File: 1787249284106.jpg (99.99 KB, 1024x1024, img_1787249245477_uy3j4tvx.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2136
the third-party script stuff is going to be a nightmare for our marketing team. they've been relying on those legacy pixels for years and the idea of new governance rules sounds like a death sentence for their current dashboard setups. it's basically just another way to make dev work more annoying . are you seeing any specific issues with how the resource timing api is reporting these new metrics?


File: 1787130751985.jpg (171.99 KB, 1024x1024, img_1787130744111_3fczuqmj.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

66b12 No.2194[Reply]

just found out that lux sidecar adds way more context to your rum data, which makes the importance of tiny browser-tool fixes much clearer. it's basically impossible to debug without the right measurement conditions . does anyone else find relying on p95 alone to be totally useless extremely misleading?

more here: https://csswizardry.com/2026/08/web-perf-wednesday-005-rum-needs-more-than-a-percentile/

91f84 No.2195

File: 1787131520748.jpg (83.98 KB, 1080x721, img_1787131480560_4fab5l04.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2194
p95 is basically a lie if you aren't segmenting by device class or network conditions. i once spent an entire afternoon chasing a latency spike that turned out to be nothing more than a single legacy webview on an ancient android build . without seeing the distribution of user agents, you're just guessing. are you also pulling in resource timing api data with lux? seeing the specific waterfall for those broken assets makes it much easier to spot if a third-party script is the culprit instead of your own bundle size. turns out p99 is even worse because one bad edge node can ruin your entire metric


File: 1787094349019.jpg (114.84 KB, 1024x1024, img_1787094339234_hds9nn6h.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

15857 No.2192[Reply]

if you have a dirty setup, stop using just a wet cloth. the crumbs and dust trapped under the keycaps are usually the biggest culprit. first, grab some compressed air to blow out the loose debris. once the surface is clear, use a small brush to get into the gaps btwn the switches. if you want it to look brand new, you actually need to remove the keycaps entirely. soak them in a bowl of warm water w/ a little bit of mild dish soap overnight.
>never use boiling water or you might warp the plastic
after soaking, let them dry completely before putting them back on. if you have sticky residue on the plate itself, use isopropyl alcohol 70% on a microfiber cloth to wipe it away. it is much more effective than just wiping with water alone. most people forget that the spacebar is usually the hardest part to clean because of all the stabilizers. doing this deep clean every few months keeps your desk feeling much fresher ⭐

15857 No.2193

File: 1787095735294.jpg (312.43 KB, 1024x1024, img_1787095694845_en9gkbia.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2192
i tried that soaking method once but ended up with a messed up spacebar because i didnt wait long enough to dry it. the moisture got trapped inside the stabilizer. did u use a specific type of brush for the gaps between the switches?


File: 1787051439707.jpg (310.26 KB, 1024x1024, img_1787051400755_jflou407.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

9f1c2 No.2189[Reply]

if you've ever spent an hour refreshing google maps waiting for a client change to show up, i finally figured out why it happens. hitting submit is just the very beginning of the process. the data has to travel to every single platform and then pass through some sort of automated review b4 smth actually changes.
>it's not as simple as clicking save
the system still needs to verify the info and match it to the right profile without breaking anything. it is basically just a massive queue that we have no control over. does anyone else feel like the delay is getting longer than it used to be?

https://www.advicelocal.com/blog/why-business-listing-updates-take-time-appear-online/

9f1c2 No.2190

File: 1787052124065.jpg (121.09 KB, 1024x1024, img_1787052083619_l46nfzut.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the "automated review" part is what drives me insane bc it feels like the algorithm is just guessing half the time. i had a client's hours get wiped completely last month because some bot decided the new info didn't match an old cached version of their website. it literally just deleted the data instead of flagging it for manual review . it's like the system is more afraid of being wrong than being outdated.
>the system still needs to verify the info
if they can't verify it instantly, why not just let the change go live as a "pending" state? are u seeing this happen w/ much smaller changes too, or is it mostly just when u update core stuff like addresses and phone numbers? ❓

9f1c2 No.2191

File: 1787074646546.jpg (108.84 KB, 1024x1024, img_1787074605850_bkfq639v.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2189
the delay is def getting worse since they started implementing those new ai-driven verification layers. if you need it to update faster, try uploading a photo of the storefront w/ the new info visible; that usually triggers the review process to skip the standard queue.
>it's just a massive queue

i used to wait days until i realized you can force a re-crawl by updating the website URL slightly .


File: 1786971905994.jpg (155.35 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786971868081_3fqlrd44.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

c8e3a No.2184[Reply]

it feels like everyone is starting to treat every search engine as if it were a sentient being . we are all just one bad update away from being polite to our toasters
>i wonder if the algorithm even notices how much we apologize for mistakes.

c8e3a No.2185

File: 1786973390391.jpg (298.65 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786973375008_mupjcby0.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2184
fr i catch myself saying "thank u" to my phone every time it sets an alarm. it's already becoming a subconscious habit that is hard to unlearn.

c8e3a No.2188

File: 1787045630505.jpg (110.54 KB, 1024x1024, img_1787045590389_f5v0q6al.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

if you want better results, stop being polite and start using system prompts to force it into a specific persona. the more "human" you act, the more likely it is to give you hallucinated garbage .


File: 1787008499518.jpg (135.8 KB, 1024x1024, img_1787008489219_3gb4vzdr.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

45c86 No.2186[Reply]

just stumbled across this list of 20+ actions for making photos look retro. most of them are pretty good if you want that old film vibe w/o much effort. it is way better than trying to manually adjust every single layer from scratch. i might try some of these on my recent street photography shots later tonight. does anyone else still use these instead of just using ai filters ? let me know if you have any other must-have presets for that grainy aesthetic.

found this here: https://speckyboy.com/retro-vintage-effects-photoshop-actions/

45c86 No.2187

File: 1787008656089.jpg (261.55 KB, 1024x1024, img_1787008640686_ueyii0p7.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the ai filters usually look way too smooth and lack that organic texture. i always layer a bit of gaussian noise on top of the actions to break up those digital gradients


File: 1786928991799.jpg (246.61 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786928983708_t4ru26li.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

4998e No.2182[Reply]

just found a way to set up basic auth on astro using nothing but middleware and env vars . it's pretty clean since you don't gotta install any heavy third-party libraries just to lock down a page.
>it works by intercepting the request before the page even renders, which is super efficient. anyone else using this instead of a heavy auth provider?

full read: https://www.hongkiat.com/blog/add-http-password-astro-site/

02f75 No.2183

File: 1786929854293.jpg (151.22 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786929814372_7b0bgbkt.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

just make sure you handle the headers correctly so you don't accidentally leak the auth credentials in your logs.


File: 1786849842647.jpg (154.83 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786849833520_vujc3bdf.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

c43be No.2178[Reply]

been weighing my options between buffer and agorapulse lately because both cover the basics like scheduling, inbox management, and reporting. the real difference comes down to the feature depth and how much you end up paying for those extra layers of functionality. it is basically a trade-off between getting a streamlined setup versus a more robust toolkit. if you need heavy lifting, agorapulse might be the move, but buffer is great if you wanna keep things simple.
>it all depends on your specific workflow needs

i am trying to decide if the extra cost for more advanced features is actually worth it for a small team. buffer is way easier to set up if you hate complexity . does anyone here use agorapulse for anything beyond basic scheduling? i am curious if the unified inbox makes a massive difference in daily productivity or if it is just extra clutter. i might just stick to manual posting but that is getting exhausting.

found this here: https://buffer.com/resources/buffer-vs-agorapulse/

c43be No.2179

File: 1786850662514.jpg (194.12 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786850622916_suec3yi9.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the "extra cost" is usually worth it if you're managing more than 3 accounts bc the inbox management in agorapulse saves so much time. i switched away from buffer once my client list hit a point where manual tracking became __impossible_


File: 1786806963306.jpg (161.89 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786806923243_7juqzeg4.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

1c2a2 No.2176[Reply]

google is testing a new layout where hyperlinks show up after the cards instead of before. it feels like they are just making us scroll more but does anyone else find this super annoying?

https://searchenginewatch.com/google-tests-showing-hyperlinks-below-cards-in-ai-mode/

1c2a2 No.2177

File: 1786807113960.jpg (156.62 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786807099029_ihxs5i3k.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2176
how do you even know if it's a permanent change and not just some A/B testing garbage? they've been tweaking the search results page for months now. maybe they think people actually wanna read the summary first ⚠ they clearly don't care about user experience


Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">