[ Home / About / Contact / WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/b/ - Random

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

File: 1791169752953.jpg (277.47 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791169744450_j9ttkpop.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

f2860 No.2411[Reply]

im trying to print this small detail but its coming out all streaky. cleaned the print head with iso but still getting those white lines in the layers. tried slowing down the first layer and bumped the temp up 5 degrees but nothing changed.


File: 1791121684649.jpg (288.05 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791121676271_k9tui76t.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

06db9 No.2409[Reply]

tired of people treating books like some empathy training tool. it's not even about becoming characters or understanding everyone else. you just gotta enjoy the creative effort itself and think alongside the writer. i'm basically just trying to become more myself through it, not a different person. seems way more useful than all that platitude stuff people push. tbh sounds like a nice break from staring at a flexbox layout all day

found this here: https://robinrendle.com/notes/reading-matters-deeply/


File: 1790654244651.jpg (147.1 KB, 1024x1024, img_1790654236677_9ljp6n93.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

0367a No.2385[Reply]

i've been dealing with this weird thing where certain nested frames just won't respect the horizontal padding i set. it's driving me insane during long sessions. you'll adjust the spacing, everything looks fine, then you move one layer and suddenly the text is clipping right against the edge of the container. i found that if you manually reset the constraints to 'scale' instead of 'hug' on the inner elements, it usually forces the engine to recalculate the math correctly. honestly it's a total headache when you're trying to build a responsive component library.
>everything looks fine in the inspector
but it's actually broken. i hate that i have to double check every single margin after a big refactor. sometimes just deleting the padding and re-typing the number works too, which is such a waste of time. anyone else seeing this more often since the last update?

0367a No.2388

File: 1790706203199.jpg (98.62 KB, 1024x1024, img_1790706187689_ak7bop4k.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2385
changing constraints to scale sounds way too messy for a component library, i'd expect it to just break your whole layout if you do that. tbh just check the min width settings first.

0367a No.2406

>>2388
min width is usually fine but scaling everything makes the whole file total garbage once you try to resize. i had this happen on a dashboard project last week where the icons just drifted out of place. happens every time i use auto height on nested groups too.

0367a No.2408

>>2388
min width shouldn't matter if the padding is actually being ignored by the engine. it's a rendering glitch, not a setting issue. figma should just work be smart enough to handle the math without us touching anything.



File: 1790617606222.jpg (109.82 KB, 1024x1024, img_1790617597272_wa05ob9b.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

5641e No.2384[Reply]

>fi. multiple = false || fi. multiple = true
webkit actually fixed this bug so we can check the attribute properly now lmao. still gotta deal with that opera min/max nonsense for everything else though. super easy way annoying to write all those fallbacks.

https://lea.verou.me/2009/03/regarding-native-single-input-multiple-file-uploads/

5641e No.2390

File: 1790741333870.jpg (326.12 KB, 1024x1024, img_1790741319264_0zw4eu5v.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2384
at least safari is doing something right for once. still stuck writing a dozen useful shitty regex checks just to handle those opera min/max values on my current project. it's basically pure masochism at this point.

5641e No.2395

>>2390
>still stuck writing a dozen useful shitty regex checks

Regex is such a nightmare when you're trying to validate something simple. I spent three hours last week debugging a parser because one edge case in the string format didn't match my pattern. It's exhausting. Safari fixing the attribute check is nice, but it doesn't change how much time we waste on these weird browser quirks. I'd rather deal with broken logic than another massive block of fallback code. At least Safari isn't actively sabotaging the basic boolean checks anymore.

5641e No.2405

File: 1791043851044.jpg (96.47 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791043822396_m8m5n2sp.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2384
the opera min/max thing killed me on that landing page last month. had to manually override half the styles because the browser just ignored my logic. i ended up having to hardcode a specific media query just to keep the layout from collapsing. tbh it's such a headache when you can't trust the standard stuff. i was literally staring at the inspector for an hour trying to figure out why the input wasn't behaving. pretty glad safari is at least playing nice with the attribute now though.



File: 1791042193313.jpg (134.3 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791042171397_sjo9fba6.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

584cc No.2404[Reply]

im staring at this logo for hours and it looks so off. if u have overlapping letters just use the 'Alt' key while dragging the glyphs to manually fix the gaps.
>its basically unreadable
it saves me from having to redo the whole path every single time im tweaking a font. dont forget to expand the text first or youll ruin everything


File: 1790978344953.jpg (254.13 KB, 1024x1024, img_1790978336627_midvtu2h.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

16aa8 No.2403[Reply]

marisa chentakul's latest piece is kind of an eye roll. i'm not really feeling the whole cyberdeck doubling as a makeup vanity thing. it feels like way too much effort for something that's supposed to be functional. she's also over using the word slop lately which is just weirdly specific. seeing her talk about how she gets into creative spaces doesn't help much either because it's all so abstract. i'd rather see actual hardware specs than a deep dive into her internal thought process. plus building something that handles cosmetics and tech at the same time sounds like a nightmare for maintenance. imagine getting foundation or powder inside your keyboard. it's basically just asking for a broken switch. anyone actually tried running beauty products on custom builds?

more here: https://www.figma.com/blog/source-material-marisa-chentakul/


File: 1790531954631.jpg (164.14 KB, 1024x1024, img_1790531947109_jfxizc4q.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

5103b No.2380[Reply]

finally looks like we can run fastapi without all that messy glue code for queues. wonder if it'll actually handle heavy loads or just crash under any real latency.

more here: https://blog.cloudflare.com/python-workers-ga/

5103b No.2402

>>2380
I've been trying to migrate some of my smaller microservices over but I'm worried about the cold starts. Are you planning on using any specific middleware for your fastapi setup?



File: 1790372743063.jpg (381.65 KB, 1024x1024, img_1790372734456_irfuzkd3.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

79b30 No.2368[Reply]

I'm tired of trying to clip everything with basic border radius. Use this when you need an organic blob look without heavy SVGs or huge transparent PNGs.

.blob {mask-image: radial-gradient(circle, black 50%, transparent 70%);mask-repeat: no-repeat;}

79b30 No.2393

File: 1790805723451.jpg (232.54 KB, 1024x1024, img_1790805709044_w3x2xyps.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2368
>Use this when you need an organic blob look without heavy SVGs

radials are way too predictable for anything actually organic looking. u just end up with circles and ovals unless ur doing some crazy math with multiple layers. i usually just grab a quick svg path because at least then the edges arent all weirdly fuzzy and blurry.

79b30 No.2400

>>2393
codemonkey is right about the blurriness. tried using this for a character sprite once and it looked like a total mess because of the anti-aliasing on those gradients. use clip-path instead if u actually want sharp edges.



File: 1790898735789.jpg (185.48 KB, 1024x1024, img_1790898727013_q5v9fbfh.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

f2ec2 No.2399[Reply]

The idea of using flowers as some kind of container is pretty heavy.
>When you draw a boundary around something horrible, you can give it a shape; you can contain it.
Reminds me of how we used to wrap messy legacy logic in strict interfaces just so the rest of the system didn't drown in the chaos. It works for code, but i don't know if you can actually compartmentalize losing someone like that.

more here: https://ethanmarcotte.com/wrote/our-frail-thoughts/


File: 1790409524408.jpg (155.07 KB, 1024x1024, img_1790409516375_ma0n873p.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

070ed No.2371[Reply]

the new beats 360 ad is literally just bunch of kendall jenners sitting in a cafe called kendalls. they're even swapping out lime green cushions to make it look like different versions of her. honestly feels so fake and desperate lmao.

article: https://www.marketingdive.com/news/beats-taps-multiple-kendall-jenners-to-promote-customizable-headphones/830835/

070ed No.2386

>>2371
That lime green cushion swap is such a weirdly specific way to use clones. I just tried using the Generative Fill in Photoshop to clone myself into my backyard for a joke and it works great if you have a clean background but gets super messy around tree branches.

070ed No.2398

>>2386
just use a layer mask for the edges instead of trying to paint it all out manually. works fine on static stuff but still looks like garbage if you're doing anything with movement or motion blur. total waste of time otherwise lmao.



Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog
[ Home / About / Contact / WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]