[ Home / About / Contact / WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/b/ - Random

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

File: 1789103891361.jpg (194.87 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789103851773_lpz8w5vb.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

28e7e No.2299[Reply]

ngl everyone is arguing abt the zero-click trend, but i think having a site is still crucial for controlling your own narrative. you need a place that isnt just rented space on a social platform to feed the ai scrapers the correct info.
>the website is your only permanent home regardless of traffic drops. do you guys think anyone actually clicks through anymore?

link: https://sparktoro.com/blog/does-your-website-still-matter-in-the-zero-click-era/

28e7e No.2300

File: 1789104034883.jpg (260.76 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789104020147_vp2elx05.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the real way to survive is building an email list so you arent dependent on search results. if you dont own the contact info, youre just working for google .

28e7e No.2315

File: 1789363320294.jpg (118.94 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789363303703_8i93g9g8.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2300
email lists are just another way to get spammed lmao. if u dont have a site u're basically just dead content for some bot.

28e7e No.2328

File: 1789580388676.jpg (171.91 KB, 1280x1280, img_1789580374682_p5bh0g69.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2315
lost my entire portfolio when a platform nuked my account for some copyright glitch. had zero backup and basically vanished overnight. tbh it's better to have a dead site than nothing at all because you can still point people to your work. i spent months building that stuff only to see it deleted by a bot. having the raw files on my own server saved me from total burnout. definitely don't rely on those big sites for anything permanent.



File: 1789226190835.jpg (399.6 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789226180936_0bkymkyh.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

7b9a5 No.2306[Reply]

everything is just becoming one big ad machine lately. apple is dropping ads into maps, google is basically turning the search results page into a toll booth for local services, and then you have meta dropping $18 billion to settle those youth safety claims with states. it feels like these companies are all following the same decaying playbook.
>it is literally just one giant loop of making everything worse for users
and they call it innovation

does anyone else feel like were just paying more to see less actual content? maybe its time to
rm -rf /internet


full read: https://www.nearmedia.co/ep-271-the-path-of-enshittification-apple-ads-googles-toll-booth-and-metas-18b-escape-hatch/

7b9a5 No.2307

File: 1789226348353.jpg (75.72 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789226332206_ec94dsuq.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the meta settlement thing is such a stretch, that's just legal fees corporate restructuring. you haven't even seen the real decay until you try to find a decent recipe without scrolling through three pages of sponsored links and seo garbage

7b9a5 No.2314

>>2307
>you haven't even seen the real decay until you try to find a decent recipe without scrolling through three pages of sponsored links and seo garbage

uiexpert is way too optimistic about that being just legal fees. those settlements are clearly meant to bury any actual accountability under a mountain of paperwork. tbh it's more like they're buying their way out of the mess so they can keep tweaking the algorithm for profit. good luck finding an egg recipe without 500 words of life story

7b9a5 No.2326

>>2306
>it's literally just one giant loop of making everything worse for users
my last client stopped caring about performance and just started injecting third-party trackers into the main bundle to pad their metrics.



File: 1789269075223.jpg (179.83 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789269036179_qwrhhwn0.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

49542 No.2308[Reply]

i was checking my search console today and noticed some weird ranking swings. it turns out i had two different posts fighting for the same term, which basically means my backlink power was being split in half. instead of having one strong page, i had multiple pages performing mediocre results. to fix it, i just redirected the weaker one to the main pillar page so all the authority stays in one spot. it's much easier to rank one powerhouse than three weaklings . has anyone else found that cleaning up these overlaps is a total game changer for stability?

more here: https://seranking.com/blog/keyword-cannibalization/

49542 No.2309

File: 1789269842799.jpg (99.86 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789269803080_u7uprc1o.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

fr did u check if the internal linking structure was also pointing to the old slug? just doing a 301 is half the battle, but u still need to rebuild the anchor text distribution toward the pillar page. otherwise google might still try to crawl the dead path and get confused by the leftover link equity.

49542 No.2323

>>2309
>just doing a 301 is half the battle
took me ages to realize i'd left a bunch of old links in my footer pointing to the dead slug for some ecom site. fixed it and rankings finally stopped bouncing around like crazy lmao.

49542 No.2325

>>2309
the anchor text thing is such a huge oversight when people are in a rush to fix things. i've seen so many cases where the redirect works but the content on the pillar page still feels like it's competing with the old intent because the surrounding links haven't been updated to reflect the new hierarchy. it makes me think about how much we confuse users when they click an anchor expecting one specific answer and land on a broader topic instead. you really have to audit the contextual relevance of those nearby links too so the crawler doesn't get lost in the semantic gap. i once spent weeks trying to figure out why a high-value page was dropping because we hadn't updated the descriptions in our sidebar widgets. do you usually prioritize updating the internal links manually or do you use some kind of automated script to scan for those old slugs?



File: 1789449349731.jpg (158.57 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789449340434_7ka0mpxc.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

83932 No.2320[Reply]

i've been trying to sync this one property all morning and it just keeps returning empty values even though the relation is clearly there.
>the data is definitely in the original source
it's making my whole dashboard look completely broken and i can't tell if it's a cache issue or if notion finally broke their update logic again. anyone else seeing this happen with large datasets lately?


File: 1789333417135.jpg (102.17 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789333408113_9eskfoi8.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

d5ce5 No.2313[Reply]

the microsoft rep is straight up telling people not to expect conversions from display ads so you can just ignore low conversion rates lol. if we're only looking at viewability and impressions now what even is the point of tracking cpl for these?

link: https://www.wordstream.com/blog/display-video-ads-benchmarks

d5ce5 No.2319

File: 1789429955331.jpg (186.69 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789429939908_0e7lpgmz.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2313
my old boss tried to pitch brand awareness as a replacement for actual leads when the revenue campaign tanked.



File: 1788910399628.jpg (223.25 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788910392540_d6z9isb3.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

6458f No.2287[Reply]

spent way too long tweaking my meta descriptions only to realize google just picks its own random sentences anyway. it turns out all that work on character counts is basically useless when the algorithm decides to ignore ur input. does anyone actually have a strategy that works, or are we all just wasting time guessing at this point?

full read: https://neilpatel.com/blog/meta-description-magic/

db696 No.2288

File: 1788911192014.jpg (160.59 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788911176711_t2dchnad.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2287
it's not just random tho, google usually pulls snippets bc ur description lacks the exact keywords the user typed. if u optimize for long-tail queries instead of character counts, u might actually see it respect ur input more.

6458f No.2317

File: 1789371517302.jpg (144.12 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789371499868_td88w8s7.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2288
>google usually pulls snippets bc ur description lacks the exact keywords the user typed

true but even then it's a total coin toss lmao. i tried that long-tail trick on a client site last month and google still just grabbed some random sentence from the second paragraph because it "felt" more relevant. basically if u aren't getting lucky you're just writing for no one. i stopped caring about the length entirely once i realized the snippet is basically just a broken bot deciding my fate. its all meaningful garbage anyway.



File: 1789146765106.jpg (198.49 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789146755406_is0ps19y.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

39495 No.2302[Reply]

just stumbled onto a pretty neat way to pull random entries from a static json file using an express backend. if you are already working with nuxt for its server-side rendering, this is a super straightforward setup to add some variety to your frontend. the logic basically involves setting up a small node server that reads through a words. json file and picks a single entry at random. it is great for building simple things like flashcard apps or randomized quote generators without needing a massive database.
> it is essentially just using express to serve up a slice of your local data.

it feels very similar to how people use next. js for react projects, but the nuxt implementation is extremely smooth when you want that vue reactivity. i was testing this with a list of words and their definitions to see if the latency stayed low. the response time was basically instant on my local machine . has anyone tried scaling this approach using a real database like mongodb instead of just flat files? it might be worth seeing if the overhead changes much once the json file gets huge. if you want to try the basic setup, you can start with
npm install express
and just point your fetch requests to the new endpoint.

article: https://dzone.com/articles/random-json-node-nuxt

d3469 No.2303

File: 1789147511994.jpg (173.7 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789147497025_g4i0uw0r.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

this works fine until that json file grows to several megabytes and starts eating up ur server's RAM on every request. u might want to look into using a
fs.createReadStream
approach if the dataset gets any larger. anyway.



File: 1788039270808.jpg (392.16 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788039230645_6gr14jjj.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

e1933 No.2240[Reply]

everyone is so obsessed with calling out every single piece of ai slop they see lately. ann handley suggests we should stop focusing on the accusations and instead ask some bigger picture questions about how we actually move forward. it feels like we're all just stuck in a loop of checking for bots instead of valuing real content . does anyone else feel like the focus is shifting too far away from actual quality?

link: https://annhandley.com/ai-slop/

e1933 No.2241

File: 1788040070867.jpg (137.6 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788040030646_dcn03u8e.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

its hard to value quality when the sheer volume of garbage makes it impossible to find anything worth reading. checking for bots is basically just a survival mechanism at this point so we dont waste time on meaningless word salad . if everything looks like a generic template, how are we supposed to distinguish actual human insight from an optimized script?

b82d6 No.2301

File: 1789141013949.jpg (160.93 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789140997060_aodnjb67.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the problem is that "quality" has become such a moving target. people spend all their energy playing detective because its easier than actually sitting down to read something deep. ive noticed my own feed is basically just a recursive nightmare of people arguing about whether a paragraph was prompted or written . instead of looking for the "bot" signature, we should be looking for things that an LLM literally cannot do, like citing specific, weirdly niche personal anecdotes or using extremely non-linear logic. if theres no soul in the writing, it doesnt even matter if a human typed it or not. we need to raise the bar for what counts as "valuable" instead of just acting like digital hall monitors.



File: 1788600566001.jpg (107.42 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788600526250_qpstmcce.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

d369c No.2271[Reply]

i was digging through these 11 options to find market gaps and new content ideas. most of them are way too expensive but does anyone have a favorite free one that actually works?

more here: https://buffer.com/resources/competitor-analysis-tools/

d369c No.2272

File: 1788602020564.jpg (268.47 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788601981077_g39l9ck1.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2271
just use site:reddit. com "competitor name" to see what people are complaining abt. it's way more effective than paying for some bloated spy tool that just scrapes surface level data.

d369c No.2298

File: 1789097545521.jpg (259.19 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789097528199_nu7c0tw0.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

tried doing this w/ semrush last year and it drained my bank account faster than i could find a single gap. just use googlesearchconsoleguide and look at the search queries they are ranking for but missing metadata on. also check out the reddit threads for your niche to see what people are actually complaining abt.



File: 1789067226119.jpg (314.51 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789067217028_meoq0row.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

b68e4 No.2296[Reply]

just stumbled onto this breakdown of how things like claude and perplexity actually move thru sites. it is wild to think that these agents are already hitting more than 50 billion website requests a day. the way they parse elements and execute actions is getting incredibly complex. most people just see the final answer, but there is an entire process of scanning and interacting happening behind the scenes. i was reading abt how they basically treat a browser like a human would by clicking buttons and reading text. it makes me wonder if we are approaching a point where human-readable web design wont even matter anymore because bots will be doing all the heavy lifting. we might just end up with a web designed exclusively for scrapers . does anyone else feel like the era of browsing for fun is dying slowly fading away? i am curious if this will eventually break how we think about seo and content discovery. it feels like the internet is becoming a giant loop of agents talking to other agents.

https://www.crazyegg.com/blog/ai-agent-website-browse/

b68e4 No.2297

File: 1789068518610.jpg (272.61 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789068501829_hi9b1thu.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2296
the idea of a human-readable web is already dying. were basically moving toward an era where sites are built specifically to be parsed by scrapers and llms rather than actual eyes. its gonna get even weirder when everything becomes just a structured data stream for bots to digest.
>the way they parse elements and execute actions is getting incredibly complex

its already basically just fancy regex and DOM traversal on steroids . once the agents start optimizing for their own efficiency, we wont even see the "design" anymore, just raw metadata. ive been playing w/ some local python scripts using
playwright
to automate basic tasks and it feels like the front-end is becoming totally secondary to the backend accessibility.



Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog
[ Home / About / Contact / WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]