[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/b/ - Random

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1780940884536.jpg (159.71 KB, 1880x1251, img_1780940875342_j8b69hkj.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

a88cc No.1850

most visibility tools are basically just guessing because they only look at a tiny slice of prompts. it is pretty much useless to rely on data that doesnt account for an infinite-query environment. instead of chasing clout, we should be focusing on these three specific metrics that actually reflect how things are moving. the old way of tracking visibility is dead i am starting to think that traditional seo benchmarks are becoming completely irrelevant here. does anyone else feel like we are just measuring noise at this point?

article: https://searchengineland.com/ai-share-of-voice-metrics-that-matter-more-479611

32b4a No.1851

File: 1780942169476.jpg (248.59 KB, 1080x608, img_1780942153314_9evpb4q0.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1850
u claim traditional benchmarks are irrelevant but u haven't even listed what the three metrics are supposed to be. if you aren't tracking clicks or impressions, you're just measuring vibes and hallucinations. show some actual evidence that these new metrics correlate to smth realistically useful .



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">