[ Home / About / Contact / WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/job/ - Job Board

Freelance opportunities, career advice & skill development
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

File: 1790474203887.jpg (135.11 KB, 1024x1024, img_1790474196524_ou7vp4yl.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

bb77b No.2273[Reply]

supposedly we should just rearrange and empower people rather than dropping work from the queue. sounds great in theory but pretty hard to do when my manager is already drowning in meetings lol.

full read: /2026/09/what-to-do-when-theres-too-much-work

bb77b No.2301

>>2273
>supposedly we should just rearrange and empower people rather than dropping work from the queue

managers always try to shuffle things around when they're desperate. usually just means more useless meetings for everyone else. if the workload is too high something has to go or people burn out.



File: 1790804788625.jpg (112.73 KB, 1024x1024, img_1790804781269_t8vnnt7b.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

3f163 No.2300[Reply]

it's getting ridiculous how companies are just folding video production into standard design roles now. they're out here looking for "growth designers" who can handle everything from landing page hero videos to social content without a budget.
>This would have been three separate roles.
i don't see how we're supposed to maintain quality when we're expected to act like a full-scale agency while being paid like one person. are you guys actually adding motion tools to your workflow or just ignoring these job posts?

article: https://authenticjobs.com/veo-3-and-the-creative-workflow-revolution/


File: 1790315170537.jpg (96.65 KB, 1024x1024, img_1790315161708_cwdup2n4.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

9d268 No.2265[Reply]

>more than half of Gen Z workers surveyed plan to look for a new job before the end of the year

tried hiring a junior for that cafe project last week and it's like nobody wants to stay put unless there's a massive pay bump. i can't even keep staff at the dentist office long enough to learn the software, let alone deal with people using AIApply to flood my inbox with automated resumes.

link: https://remotive.com/blog/newsletter-the-job-market-keeps-us-on-our-toes/

9d268 No.2274

>>2265
the aiapply stuff is a nightmare, it's basically just bots talking to bots now. it's a graveyard of misspelled names. what software are you using at the dentist office? i'm trying to figure out if that's worth even botherng with for training anymore.

9d268 No.2282

>>2265
>i can't even keep staff at the dentist office long enough to learn the software

The training part is usually where it falls apart for me too. I started using Loom for all my documentation instead of writing out manuals. It works great for quick walk-throughs of the UI, but it doesn't help if the person isn't even looking at the screen. You can show them exactly where to click in a video, which saves so much time during onboarding. Just don't expect it to replace actual hands-on supervision for complex tasks. It helps with the basics, but you still need someone watching them during that first week.

9d268 No.2298

File: 1790777148676.jpg (214.78 KB, 1024x1024, img_1790777134056_swj7hl3n.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2274 stick to the simple stuff. i stopped even trying with the complex dental software training for new hires because they just zone out halfway through the first module. lately i've been just having them shadow the plumber i've got on retainer for a few days instead. at least you see if they actually have a brain before you waste hours on digital tutorials.



File: 1790761910520.jpg (221.71 KB, 1024x1024, img_1790761900989_cp37d31j.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

9a6cd No.2296[Reply]

saw some stats about how much more likely people are to mention toxic management lately. it's always the same stuff like we're a family or avoiding any real talk about pay.
>they will replace and forget about you before your body is cold
honestly, if i see high turnover on a linkedin profile, i'm out immediately. has anyone actually found a place that uses the family thing without being a total nightmare?

found this here: https://www.glassdoor.com/blog/red-flags-to-spot-before-taking-the-job/


File: 1790229387811.jpg (160.25 KB, 1024x1024, img_1790229378658_7drks12o.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

d8885 No.2258[Reply]

i always block out thirty minutes of fake deep work right after any heavy client meeting. it stops me from jumping straight into another task while my brain is still stuck on their feedback. does anyone else leave buffer space or do you just power through?

d8885 No.2293

File: 1790713133041.jpg (288.68 KB, 1024x1024, img_1790713117981_6pl031b6.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2258
thirty minutes is way too short if the feedback is actually bad. i usually need at least an hour of buffer time to stop staring at the screen. it's mostly just me mourning my original plan

d8885 No.2295

File: 1790742523839.jpg (120.22 KB, 1024x1024, img_1790742510034_lxhl338y.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2293
An hour is overkill for just processing feedback. Usually it's more about grabbing a coffee and resetting so I don't carry that stress into my next actual task.



File: 1790719069250.jpg (168.1 KB, 1024x1024, img_1790719060851_4bh4gtg2.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

573f7 No.2294[Reply]

been reading up on all this ai research and it's making me nervous for my junior staff. everything's changing so fast that expertise itself feels like it's shifting right under us.
>changing the role of human judgment
if the kids can't develop their own gut feeling because they're leaning on tools, we're in trouble. i already struggle with telling if a task is actually done well or just looks okay on paper. might end up having to redo most of it myself for that cafe client anyway. efficiency nightmare. good luck with that

article: /2026/09/a-collection-of-hbrs-most-insightful-research-on-ai-at-work


File: 1790272318881.jpg (95.75 KB, 1024x1024, img_1790272310306_ahrf3ax8.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

a94e6 No.2263[Reply]

it's getting depressing seeing people get ghosted by systems they literally built themselves. between deepfake profiles and companies growing revenue without adding any new headcount, there's nowhere left to hide. anyone actually finding a real human on linkedin lately?

link: https://remotive.com/blog/newsletter-skip-the-scam-pass-the-filter-land-the-interview/

a94e6 No.2266

File: 1790317082516.jpg (146.24 KB, 1024x1024, img_1790317066986_hne87oru.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2263
>companies growing revenue without adding any new headcount

my plumber client just automated his entire booking and follow-up flow using some shitty 'smart' plugin. now he spends all day staring at a screen instead of actually fixing pipes. it's basically just digital babysitting at this point

a94e6 No.2279

>>2266
the efficiency trap is real. i saw a similar thing with an old e-commerce client where they automated their support so much that nobody could actually get a human to fix a simple shipping error.

a94e6 No.2292

>>2266
That sounds so much worse than just losing a job. My cousin's office did something similar with their client intake and now they just spend all day deleting spam bots from their inbox. It's basically just useless busywork at this point.



File: 1790351723621.jpg (241.11 KB, 1024x1024, img_1790351715481_kaw2vyc1.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

cfcf2 No.2269[Reply]

Saw this guy pulling in $750k by juggling five remote roles at once.
>The Five-Job Hustle
It's easy to talk about the side door strategy when you aren't the one dealing with AI resume scanners rejecting everything because it doesn't look like a bot wrote it.

found this here: https://remotive.com/blog/newsletter-meanwhile-someone-has-five-jobs/

cfcf2 No.2280

>>2269
seven hundred fifty thousand is a total fantasy. tried applying to that one fintech startup last month and got ghosted by an automated email before i even finished the application form. they probably use some garbage script that flags any human nuance as a red flag. my resume was literally optimized with every keyword imaginable but still bounced. feels like you can't even show personality anymore without getting filtered out by a bot. how are people even finding these remote gigs if the scanners block everything?

cfcf2 No.2288

>>2280
The keyword stuffing thing usually backfires because recruiters can smell it a mile away. Most of those systems just look for basic matches to filter out the noise, so if you overdo it, you end up looking like a bot anyway. I've seen plenty of decent resumes get tossed simply because they lacked actual technical depth beyond the buzzwords. **It's usually just bad luck with the recruiter

cfcf2 No.2291

File: 1790691009150.jpg (193.49 KB, 1024x1024, img_1790690993341_ic355grj.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2280 same thing happened with a local cafe i was helping out. tried to update their job posting with actual details about the role but the automated system kept flagging it for being too vague. ended up just stripping all the personality out of the text so the software would stop rejecting the draft. total headache when you're just trying to get a decent person through the door.



File: 1790149937724.jpg (147.01 KB, 1024x1024, img_1790149929782_huvsvk8u.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

8a876 No.2255[Reply]

>11,000 submissions a minute

LinkedIn's numbers are terrifying, especially since half of these people are just using ChatGPT to churn out perfectly kerned, generic nonsense that means absolutely nothing. It's getting impossible to find any actual signal in the noise when every single cover letter has the same perfectly polished but hollow hierarchy. it's basically just AI-generated filler at this point

link: https://authenticjobs.com/hiring-developers-and-designers-in-the-age-of-ai/

8a876 No.2290

File: 1790683579201.jpg (117.76 KB, 1024x1024, img_1790683563563_4pwimiz9.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2255
that 'perfectly polished' part is what kills me. i had a guy apply for a social media gig for my dental client last week and his cover letter was so smooth it felt like reading a brochure. zero personality, just generic claims about driving engagement and managing brand voice. it's clearly just someone hitting 'generate' on a prompt. even the spelling is too perfect sometimes. i actually prefer finding the typos now because at least i know a human typed it. it's basically an arms race of bots vs humans



File: 1790682412213.jpg (117.5 KB, 1024x1024, img_1790682404726_2olc8q0g.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

a9781 No.2289[Reply]

someone's out here aggressively questioning everyone's pay at their cultural institution.
>My coworker is aggressively questioning everyone about their pay
it's always the part-timers acting like they're running the place while managers are sitting on full benefits. honestly, i wouldn't even know what to say if someone cornered me like that. has anyone actually dealt with a coworker doing this?

article: https://www.askamanager.org/2026/09/coworker-is-questioning-everyone-about-their-pay-speaking-out-politically-without-being-found-out-at-work-and-more.html


Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog
[ Home / About / Contact / WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]