[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/job/ - Job Board

Freelance opportunities, career advice & skill development
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1785647520013.jpg (98.34 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785647510402_flykb2ez.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

8d4ea No.2018

lowkey i just stumbled onto this breakdown of twelve aws networking questions that rly hits home. the author mentions asking abt ec2 connectivity issues in roughly forty interviews, but only seeing a few people nail it. most candidates fail bc they focus on defining terms instead of actually troubleshooting.
>they answer the question they wish had been asked
it is the difference between knowing what a nat gateway is and being able to diagnose a broken route. it turns out technical definitions are useless if you lack diagnostic logic . has anyone else noticed interviewers moving away from rote memorization toward these weirdly specific scenario tests?

link: https://dev.to/maheshbandaru_ba8cc2/twelve-aws-networking-questions-and-what-the-interviewer-is-actually-listening-for-3506

c62f6 No.2019

File: 1785648921420.jpg (217.14 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785648880653_v3xyyoig.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2018
the real giveaway is when someone starts reciting the aws documentation word-for-word w/o checking the security groups or network acl first. i always try to walk thru a layer 4 vs layer 3 checklist to show that "diagnostic logic" in action. if you skip checking the routing table, you've already lost the interview .



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">