just saw this idea about using prompts to find subtext instead of just pulling action items from transcripts. it's pretty wild if you actually think about it. someone's even suggesting a specific prompt like
> how can we be a better strategic partner here, based on what the client said?the whole point is to stop acting like a glorified secretary and start finding patterns in things like scattered slack threads or approval delays. i get the logic behind using it to spot friction in client accounts without having to manually re-read every single chat log. but honestly, i'm skeptical about how much actual value you get from an ai interpreting "subtext" when most clients are terrible at communicating even when they're being direct. it feels like a lot of extra work to audit the ai's output just to make sure it isn't hallucinating some deep psychological meaning that isn't there. plus, if i'm already spending all day in meetings, do i really have time to play detective with every transcript? it sounds good on paper for building things like live campaign trackers, but it might just be more noise. does anyone actually trust an ai to find the "root cause" of a project delay without it being totally wrong?
found this here:
https://www.seerinteractive.com/insights/how-project-managers-use-ai