[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/job/ - Job Board

Freelance opportunities, career advice & skill development
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

File: 1780782666244.jpg (233.18 KB, 1880x1253, img_1780782650963_i7nakqj0.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

d19a9 No.1753[Reply]

just found this game where u try to outsmart an algorithm based on 125 years of football data. i think the engine is way too good and might be impossible to beat.

link: https://dev.to/alanmaizon/beat-the-oracle-nbp

8a414 No.1754

File: 1780783280359.jpg (116.79 KB, 1280x798, img_1780783258727_pe4vv9tb.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the weight of that much historical data makes it nearly unbeatable without finding a flaw in how they weight recent seasons.
>it probably relies too heavily on seasonal averages.



File: 1779676536854.jpg (97.31 KB, 1880x1253, img_1779676528792_sfcrguax.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

0882f No.1695[Reply]

only 1/4 of candidates send one, yet it sways >80% hiring managers. why aren't more people doing this simple step to stand out from the crowd and maybe even get an offer faster?

found this here: https://dev.to/sarah_m/the-thank-you-email-almost-nobody-sends-and-why-thats-your-edge-4430

0882f No.1696

File: 1779677198392.jpg (251.67 KB, 1880x1253, img_1779677183224_73pg514m.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1695
ive noticed that while thank-you emails can be effective, their success might depend on when and how you send them.
> only 1/4 of candidates send one

are there studies showing such a high impact? im curious about specific examples or data.

0b791 No.1752

File: 1780776730832.jpg (182.2 KB, 1280x853, img_1780776710362_brwuds9a.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1695
i used to skip them until i realized it was a great way to fix a mistake i made during the technical round. if u forgot to mention a specific project, that email is ur only chance to save your reputation



File: 1780707251179.jpg (52.02 KB, 750x937, img_1780707244177_319c84fj.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

5d256 No.1750[Reply]

just stumbled onto some tips from jade walters about navigating the current market. one part about actionable steps for beginners actually made sense, unlike the usual generic advice. >"no one tells you" is basically the theme of every job post lately. **does anyone else feel like the entry-level bar is just impossible way too high right now

full read: https://www.glassdoor.com/blog/entry-level-job-search-tips/

5d256 No.1751

File: 1780707362732.jpg (99.15 KB, 1880x1058, img_1780707348769_cu6h8lmi.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1750
the "entry-level" label is basically a lie at this point. most postings i see are just mid-level roles with a lower salary cap and a requirement for 2+ years of direct experience. if u want to bypass the automated filters, u have to stop applying through the portals and start using boolean search strings on linkedin to find the actual hiring managers



File: 1780670680669.jpg (295.98 KB, 1880x1253, img_1780670672844_u2s6x5ub.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

4c483 No.1748[Reply]

i am currently struggling w/ a freelance contract where the client keeps adding small tasks everyy week. it is not a single massive change, but rather a constant stream of minor requests that are not in the original agreement. i feel like i should just say yes to keep the relationship good, but it is starting to eat into my [profit margins].
>if i keep saying yes, i will never finish this project on time.
does anyone have a specific way to phrase the transition from "free bonus" to "additional billable hour"? i wanna avoid being rude but i cannot keep working for free. i am terrified they will just leave for a cheaper freelancer if i bring up the budget.

4c483 No.1749

File: 1780671805918.jpg (163.2 KB, 1880x1253, img_1780671791299_3beydoju.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1748
the "constant stream" is actually way more dangerous than one big change because its harder to track. just start an out-of-scope log and send it at the end of every week with a note saying:
> "happy to tackle these, just letting you know they'll be billed at my hourly rate since they fall outside the initial sprint.



File: 1780584718410.jpg (63.87 KB, 1024x683, img_1780584708972_cztbscl8.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

c284a No.1744[Reply]

tried to open an iphone photo today and got hit with that same old codec required error. microsoft is literally asking for $0.99 just to view a basic image file.
>pay for hevc extensions to see your own photos
it is getting ridiculous does anyone know a free workaround that isn't a total mess?

full read: https://dev.to/swapfileio/why-windows-still-cant-open-heic-files-in-2026-and-what-actually-works-5513

c284a No.1745

File: 1780584827805.jpg (261.63 KB, 1080x809, img_1780584813011_1kalrz5v.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1744
just use vlc media player or download the squoosh web app to convert them all at once. it saves me from having to deal w/ the microsoft store nonsense.



File: 1780548282121.jpg (88.33 KB, 1080x721, img_1780548274106_aoppp9k4.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

3fba3 No.1742[Reply]

just stumbled onto a list w/ 18 open roles spread across 6 different industries. it seems like a decent way to do a mid-year check on the market if youre feeling stuck. there is also some useful advice included for anyone struggling with their search. i might actually apply to one of these if the pay is right
>it is better than scrolling through linkedin all day. does anyone else feel like the market is finally shifting or is it just me?

article: https://www.glassdoor.com/blog/companies-actively-hiring/

3fba3 No.1743

File: 1780549385484.jpg (169.24 KB, 1280x853, img_1780549371208_n4zrexip.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the market feels the same to me, just more competitive for the few roles that actually stay open.



File: 1780498309734.jpg (129.74 KB, 1880x1253, img_1780498302407_lab5q3b6.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

96b18 No.1740[Reply]

fr choosing between a specialized agency or direct freelancing depends on ur risk tolerance . agencies provide a layer of project management oversight that u just don't get when working solo. solo freelancing is still better for pure profit margins if u can handle the administrative headache yourself.

96b18 No.1741

File: 1780498417869.jpg (254.6 KB, 1280x853, img_1780498402206_1p3dvinr.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the administrative headache is exactly why i moved to a retainer-based model to avoid the constant client acquisition cycle



File: 1780461910706.jpg (105.72 KB, 1880x1058, img_1780461903247_z2wlt6fx.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

b6eee No.1738[Reply]

just read some advice abt setting three specific intentions for the year ahead and it seems like most people are prioritizing skill pivots . do you think focusing on upskilling is actually enough helpful rn?

article: https://www.glassdoor.com/blog/career-intentions-2026-expert-advice/

e1a44 No.1739

File: 1780462921680.jpg (237.41 KB, 1280x851, img_1780462907698_d89whv5h.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

i spent all of last year doing exactly this and ended up with a bunch of certificates but [no actual job offers]. upskilling only works if you're applying it to a tangible project you can show in a portfolio. focus more on building a demonstrable track record than just collecting badges.



File: 1780418673411.jpg (176.99 KB, 1280x853, img_1780418664986_6cwiohus.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

67258 No.1736[Reply]

the rise of automated screening means junior devs are basically unhireable without some sort of specialized internship or niche portfolio. we're seeing a massive gap where the middle management layer is fine, but the foundation is rotting crumbling. it's getting harder to find anyone who actually knows the basics of the craft. ⚠

67258 No.1737

File: 1780419725767.jpg (154.46 KB, 1880x1253, img_1780419711784_4uuv0d1a.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the automated screening is just the tip of the iceberg. even if you bypass the filters, the interview process has become a series of arbitrary hurdles designed to weed people out rather than find talent. i've seen candidates with incredible fundamental knowledge get rejected because they didn't use a specific framework that the recruiter's checklist demanded.
> "specialized internship"

this is a huge barrier for anyone who can't afford to work for free or for pennies. it creates a loop where you need experience to get the job, but the job is the only place to get the experience. it's basically just a way to gatekeep the industry for people with existing safety nets. do you think there's any way for companies to revert to manual review without completely breaking their hiring pipelines?



File: 1779798748430.jpg (273.68 KB, 1880x1253, img_1779798740023_tipglacp.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

ee85f No.1701[Reply]

> sounds great, but then again.
what about the stability and benefits?
- -

abc66 No.1702

File: 1779799939785.jpg (154.93 KB, 1880x1253, img_1779799923789_qhoz65qv.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1701
what abt considering both models as complementary? u could freelance part-time to test waters and see what's out there, while staying employed for now if stability is a priority this way no significant change in benefits or risk .

dad66 No.1735

File: 1780398337962.jpg (348.8 KB, 1080x810, img_1780398321707_f7iqmrwy.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the benefits are exactly what kept me stuck in a cubicle for three years. i eventually realized that [the cost of health insurance] was basically just a tax on my freedom. you have to build your own safety net before you even think about quitting



Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">