[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/b/ - Random

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

File: 1789103891361.jpg (194.87 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789103851773_lpz8w5vb.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

28e7e No.2299[Reply]

ngl everyone is arguing abt the zero-click trend, but i think having a site is still crucial for controlling your own narrative. you need a place that isnt just rented space on a social platform to feed the ai scrapers the correct info.
>the website is your only permanent home regardless of traffic drops. do you guys think anyone actually clicks through anymore?

link: https://sparktoro.com/blog/does-your-website-still-matter-in-the-zero-click-era/

28e7e No.2300

File: 1789104034883.jpg (260.76 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789104020147_vp2elx05.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the real way to survive is building an email list so you arent dependent on search results. if you dont own the contact info, youre just working for google .



File: 1788600566001.jpg (107.42 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788600526250_qpstmcce.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

d369c No.2271[Reply]

i was digging through these 11 options to find market gaps and new content ideas. most of them are way too expensive but does anyone have a favorite free one that actually works?

more here: https://buffer.com/resources/competitor-analysis-tools/

d369c No.2272

File: 1788602020564.jpg (268.47 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788601981077_g39l9ck1.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2271
just use site:reddit. com "competitor name" to see what people are complaining abt. it's way more effective than paying for some bloated spy tool that just scrapes surface level data.

d369c No.2298

File: 1789097545521.jpg (259.19 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789097528199_nu7c0tw0.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

tried doing this w/ semrush last year and it drained my bank account faster than i could find a single gap. just use googlesearchconsoleguide and look at the search queries they are ranking for but missing metadata on. also check out the reddit threads for your niche to see what people are actually complaining abt.



File: 1789067226119.jpg (314.51 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789067217028_meoq0row.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

b68e4 No.2296[Reply]

just stumbled onto this breakdown of how things like claude and perplexity actually move thru sites. it is wild to think that these agents are already hitting more than 50 billion website requests a day. the way they parse elements and execute actions is getting incredibly complex. most people just see the final answer, but there is an entire process of scanning and interacting happening behind the scenes. i was reading abt how they basically treat a browser like a human would by clicking buttons and reading text. it makes me wonder if we are approaching a point where human-readable web design wont even matter anymore because bots will be doing all the heavy lifting. we might just end up with a web designed exclusively for scrapers . does anyone else feel like the era of browsing for fun is dying slowly fading away? i am curious if this will eventually break how we think about seo and content discovery. it feels like the internet is becoming a giant loop of agents talking to other agents.

https://www.crazyegg.com/blog/ai-agent-website-browse/

b68e4 No.2297

File: 1789068518610.jpg (272.61 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789068501829_hi9b1thu.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2296
the idea of a human-readable web is already dying. were basically moving toward an era where sites are built specifically to be parsed by scrapers and llms rather than actual eyes. its gonna get even weirder when everything becomes just a structured data stream for bots to digest.
>the way they parse elements and execute actions is getting incredibly complex

its already basically just fancy regex and DOM traversal on steroids . once the agents start optimizing for their own efficiency, we wont even see the "design" anymore, just raw metadata. ive been playing w/ some local python scripts using
playwright
to automate basic tasks and it feels like the front-end is becoming totally secondary to the backend accessibility.



File: 1789024667416.jpg (123.03 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789024659627_td25y0v7.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

573f7 No.2294[Reply]

JUST saw that google is doubling down on their policy against using trusted sites to host low-quality third-party content. they want to stop people from hijacking a site's good name just to manipulate search rankings. it basically targets those annoying articles that appear on legitimate news sites but are actually just trashy sponsored ads . it is pretty clear they are trying to fix the terrible user experience caused by these tactics. does anyone else feel like this is finally going to clean up the search results? i wonder if this will also affect how affiliate marketing works on bigger platforms.

https://developers.google.com/search/blog/2026/08/update-site-reputation-policy

573f7 No.2295

File: 1789024821115.jpg (150.68 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789024804701_rejgcn22.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the affiliate landscape is definitely gonna get much harder for anyone relying on parasitic content. i've already noticed my niche site traffic tanking because of these recent core updates google just hates anyone making money from clicks



File: 1788988060242.jpg (74.61 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788988021089_ii6v41ou.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

b2200 No.2292[Reply]

the 10-step korean routine is way too much work for my current lifestyle. i switched to something much simpler with tretinoin, vanicream, and medik8 c-tetra in the mornings. i am basically trying to find a way to make a high end skin device actually worth the investment before the sales hit.
>it feels like a scam if it doesn't work
but maybe it's just better than more serums
is anyone else obsessed focusing on minimalist routines lately? i need to know if these expensive tools are actually worth the $$ or if i should just stick to my basic prescription.

https://sparktoro.com/blog/how-wed-market-a-400-skincare-device-before-black-friday/

b2200 No.2293

File: 1788989636572.jpg (105.85 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788989620472_6xriebaq.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2292
the hardware is usually just a gimmick to justify a higher margin. most of those microcurrent devices are basically just fancy vibrating motors that do nothing for deep tissue. if you're already using tretinoin, your skin barrier is already doing the heavy lifting. it's all marketing fluff designed to make you feel like you're missing a step. stick to the basics and save your money for more vanicream or better prescriptions.
>if it doesn't work it's a scam
that part is spot on because most of these gadgets are just expensive light therapy that you could get from sitting near a window. unless the device has actual clinical studies backing its specific frequency, it's a waste.



File: 1788945491658.jpg (218.82 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788945453058_15kzsnj5.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

e1ac1 No.2290[Reply]

found some decent info on how to structure your site so chatgpt and perplexity actually cite you as a source. does anyone know if traditional seo is officially dead or if its still just about the same?

more here: https://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/how-to-get-ai-to-recommend-your-business/

e1ac1 No.2291

File: 1788945653848.jpg (119.4 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788945638271_oj8e79dk.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

traditional seo isnt dead, its just becoming semantic search instead of keyword stuffing. you still need the technical foundation, otherwise the crawlers wont even find your content to index it in the first place



File: 1788716027997.jpg (141.83 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788716018898_cienpvg9.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

a33ee No.2277[Reply]

just found this breakdown on vibe coding where u just chat w/ ai to build sites instead of typing
function init(){}
. it seems way faster for prototyping but i wonder if its eventually going to be total spaghetti code once things get __complex_

https://yoast.com/traditional-coding-vs-vibe-coding-website/

a33ee No.2278

File: 1788716818073.jpg (294.91 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788716802124_3yc1qoky.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2277
ngl its already spaghetti if you dont use a strict schema for your prompts. just pipe the output into eslint to catch the hallucinations before they break everything.

a33ee No.2289

File: 1788940780986.jpg (172.21 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788940765039_wrlhfic7.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the spaghetti code is already here, i just tried to scale a prompt-generated react app and it was a total nightmare of nested div hell . you'll eventually hit a wall where you have to manually debug the hallucinated logic anyway.



File: 1788910399628.jpg (223.25 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788910392540_d6z9isb3.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

6458f No.2287[Reply]

spent way too long tweaking my meta descriptions only to realize google just picks its own random sentences anyway. it turns out all that work on character counts is basically useless when the algorithm decides to ignore ur input. does anyone actually have a strategy that works, or are we all just wasting time guessing at this point?

full read: https://neilpatel.com/blog/meta-description-magic/

db696 No.2288

File: 1788911192014.jpg (160.59 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788911176711_t2dchnad.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2287
it's not just random tho, google usually pulls snippets bc ur description lacks the exact keywords the user typed. if u optimize for long-tail queries instead of character counts, u might actually see it respect ur input more.



File: 1788867536498.jpg (147.96 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788867496413_eevhowb7.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

85063 No.2285[Reply]

chrome is finally letting us track dedicated-worker congestion thru RUM, which might make debugging performance bottlenecks a lot easier. it's also tweaking things like privacy and image preloading, but i wonder if these stricter privacy rules will just break our existing tracking scripts .

https://csswizardry.com/2026/09/web-perf-wednesday-007-chrome-makes-busy-workers-measurable/

85063 No.2286

File: 1788867689532.jpg (132.27 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788867673796_dvgg25b9.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the privacy tweaks are definitely going to be a nightmare for anyone relying on third-party identifiers. are you planning to test the new RUM metrics against your existing
performance.mark
implementation?



File: 1788831073189.jpg (128.61 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788831064415_6w3yx1my.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

76490 No.2283[Reply]

The general idea is that we create a Document Picture-in-Picture window (DPIP window), and then we put HTML, CSS, and JavaScript into it. Creating Web Widgets Using the Document Picture-in-Picture API originally handwritten and published with love on CSS-Tricks. You should really get the newsletter as well.

https://css-tricks.com/creating-web-widgets-using-the-document-picture-in-picture-api/

76490 No.2284

File: 1788832583762.jpg (98.5 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788832543478_eduqirbb.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

ive been playing around w/ this but the browser support is still a bit of a headache for smth production-ready.
>hope it hits safari soon so we can actually use this for real apps.



Delete Post [ ]
Previous [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">