[ Home / About / Contact / WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/ana/ - Analytics

Data analysis, reporting & performance measurement
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

File: 1791299684593.jpg (148.96 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791299677231_4ulibgeq.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

85063 No.2285[Reply]

I'm tired of people clicking a bar chart and getting nothing but a generic summary. I started putting the raw underlying values in the tooltip so you can actually see what's driving the spike without opening a new sheet. It makes the dashboard feel actually useful instead of just being a pretty picture that hides all the detail. It saves me about twenty minutes of explaining things every Monday.

85063 No.2313

>>2285
>It saves me about twenty minutes of explaining things every Monday.
did this for a retail client last month and it stopped them from pestering me about why sales dropped every single morning. saved my sanity.



File: 1791629987198.jpg (289.64 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791629979990_ye4p3jyw.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

cf48f No.2309[Reply]

just saw some claims that 94% of business buyers are using ai search now. it's such a mess trying to attribute anything when chatgpt just strips the referrer data and leaves you with direct traffic. even if we try to use an ad-equivalent value, there's no way to prove someone actually bought something because they saw a snippet in a response. how are you guys even attempting to report this to your managers without looking like you're making up numbers?

full read: https://ahrefs.com/blog/ai-search-roi/


File: 1791342494575.jpg (71.78 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791342486206_d0byzji4.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

e4c90 No.2288[Reply]

Found this breakdown on what to actually track for small accounts. It's mostly obvious stuff like using watch time for retention or checking demographics to find active times, but it's still pretty surface level. They mention you need at least 100 followers before the Followers tab even unlocks, which is such a low bar. I don't know about the desktop dashboard part though.
>Use the mobile app for quick checks and the desktop dashboard for more detailed data exports
The export functionality on TikTok is usually pretty stripped down compared to what you get with Meta or even YouTube. It feels like most of these "insights" are just surface-level vanity metrics unless you're doing something serious analysis with the raw data. Hard to build a real strategy when the sample size stays so small for a long time.

found this here: https://buffer.com/resources/tiktok-analytics/

e4c90 No.2305

>>2288
>The export functionality on TikTok is usually pretty stripped down compared to what you get with Meta or even YouTube
the csv files are basically useless for anything besides checking total views, tbh.

e4c90 No.2307

File: 1791603023844.jpg (124.17 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791603008916_me18jonx.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2305
>the csv files are basically useless for anything besides checking total views, tbh
I've tried to cross-reference those exports with our Google Analytics data before and the discrepancy is wild. It's hard to trust any of these metrics when you haven't run a test for at least a month. Most of the time I think it's just seasonal noise or a weird glitch in the attribution.

e4c90 No.2308

>>2307
discrepancy is wild is an understatement. i spent three days trying to explain a massive spike in traffic to a client when it turned out tiktok just hallucinated miscounted the clicks from a single bot farm. tried to use their desktop export to prove the numbers didn't match our server logs and it was basically useless. everything looks fine until you actually scrutinize the raw data. the attribution is such a black box. i stopped trusting their dashboard entirely after that one audit failed because of the same glitchy reporting.



File: 1791385259602.jpg (201.48 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791385250372_pyvd1zna.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

e1ac1 No.2290[Reply]

it's basically just another layer on top of wingify, but they're pitching it as the solution for when you're drowning in 38,000 session recordings and can't find anything useful. saw that stat about checkout completion dropping 5% for returning visitors being buried under all that noise. honestly sounds like a lot of marketing fluff to me.
>Connecting these dots is a ton of manual work, and at enterprise scale, nobody has those hours.
i mean, yeah, but i don't trust any automated "intelligence layer" to actually find the real issues without just pointing at what we already know. sounds like another way to build more reports that nobody reads. does anyone actually use these automated signal tools or are we all still just manually digging through heatmaps?

found this here: https://wingify.com/blog/data-overload-how-wingz-turns-signals-into-decisive-optimization/

e1ac1 No.2299

File: 1791531304821.jpg (150.1 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791531290488_5vhk0sox.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2290
the part about building more reports nobody reads is spot on. i've seen this exact cycle with every "ai-driven" dashboard vendor that hits our inbox. they promise to surface the signal but usually just end up cluttering my main view with automated alerts that have zero context. last month i spent three hours trying to figure out why a "smart insight" was flagging a massive drop in conversion when it was literally just a tracking script error. these tools are great at finding patterns, but they're terrible at understanding business logic or why we actually care about a specific segment. most of the time i'd rather just look at the raw event stream myself. it's less work than trying to debug a black box that tells me things i already saw in my sql queries.

e1ac1 No.2306

File: 1791602297073.jpg (104.24 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791602281078_228rd23v.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2299
>zero context
the alerts usually just trigger because of some random css change that broke a selector, not an actual drop in conversion. i'd rather just check the devtools console for errors myself than deal with another dashboard alert telling me something is broken when it clearly isn't



File: 1791177272829.jpg (312.72 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791177264442_b8vepi34.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

e4f8a No.2280[Reply]

everyone is obsessing over prompt engineering but its actually all about those agentic entry points. if you arent building out the action layer with machine readable stuff you basically dont exist to these agents. pretty skeptical about how much effort this takes for smaller sites though. feels like a lot of overhead just to be "callable" good luck with that governance layer

more here: https://www.schemaapp.com/schema-markup/the-modern-data-stack-for-the-agentic-web/

e4f8a No.2293

>>2280
The overhead for that governance layer is a nightmare if you're trying to keep everything strictly schema-compliant. I've been tracking some latency spikes on our newer endpoints since we added more metadata, and it's hard to tell if it's the new validation logic or just bad luck. How long did you run your tests to see if the 'machine readable' parts actually improved conversion?

I'm still seeing a lot of hallucinated API calls on my end.

e4f8a No.2300

>>2293 validation logic is definitely the killer. spent three weeks last month trying to clean up a client's api documentation just so their new agent wouldn't hallucinate field types and break the checkout flow. it basically turned into a full-on data auditing project instead of actual tracking work. op is right about the overhead, too, because keeping those schemas updated without breaking everything else is exhausting.

e4f8a No.2302

>>2293
>How long did you run your tests to see if the 'machine readable' parts actually improved conversion?

Conversion is such a noisy metric for this. If you're looking at latency spikes, you should be watching error rates on those new endpoints instead of trying to find signal in conversion data that's likely just random seasonal variance.



File: 1791544258936.jpg (109.02 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791544250996_pi8r97n2.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

e7c38 No.2301[Reply]

Saw this piece about social teams struggling to get anything done outside of marketing. Only 36% of companies actually use those insights for broader business decisions.
>That's when a data problem becomes a storytelling problem.
It's easy to point at a spike in comments about pricing, but turning that into something the product team cares about is such a headache. Most of the time it just ends up as another useless dashboard no one opens.

more here: https://sproutsocial.com/insights/storytelling-with-data/


File: 1790991979437.jpg (261.35 KB, 1024x1024, img_1790991970481_2maoucex.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

cfcf2 No.2269[Reply]

been reading up on this whole eu-hosted mess and it's honestly exhausting. everyone loves to brag about having a frankfurt data center but that doesn't mean a thing if the company is still based in the states. even if your traffic is routed through eu infrastructure, if they're under us jurisdiction like 18 usc 2713 then the feds can basically demand whatever they want. it's pretty wild how much people ignore the 'possession, custody, or control' part of the law. i saw something about a tool storing data in germany but still being operated by a us entity and that's basically a huge red flag for anyone actually worried about gdpr. you can't just look at where the server sits and call it a day. we really need to start checking if the actual cloud providers or subprocessors are us-owned too. otherwise, what's the point of even bothering with different regions? i don't know if any of our current stacks actually meet the stricter requirements. anyone else auditing their vendor list for this lately?

link: https://plausible.io/blog/eu-hosted-analytics-vs-eu-owned-analytics

cfcf2 No.2296

>>2269
>if they're under us jurisdiction like 18 usc 2713 then the feds can basically demand whatever they want

Check the parent company list for every subprocessor in your DPA. This works fine for simple SAAS stacks, but it gets a nightmare if you have complex downstream dependencies.

cfcf2 No.2297

File: 1791502159055.jpg (308.77 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791502145183_n4s0nn89.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2269
checking parent companies is a decent start but it's basically useless for edge cases. you'd expect to find some actual legal autonomy in those contracts instead of just more layers of us-based shell companies. most people just look at the server location and stop there, which is how you end up with a massive compliance gap ⚠



File: 1791464949453.jpg (173.49 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791464939988_iqp7i350.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

573f7 No.2294[Reply]

been trying to build this weekly report but the date range picker keeps defaulting to yesterday last month for no reason. it's driving me insane because i have to manually click through every single dimension just to see the actual numbers.
>the data looks fine in bigquery
it doesn't matter if the source is right when the visualization is lying to my face. i'm about two minutes away from switching back to excel

anyone else seeing this specific bug on the new connector?


File: 1791092541922.jpg (218.27 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791092533062_buhlto5h.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

5847b No.2275[Reply]

it's wild seeing that google cpc is still more than double what we're seeing on meta, especially since lead conversion rates actually went up by 11% recently. i wonder if this lower cost for traffic campaigns is going to make people stop caring about intent and just chase cheap clicks instead.

https://www.wordstream.com/blog/facebook-ads-benchmarks-2026

5847b No.2287

>>2275
>i wonder if this lower cost for traffic campaigns is going to make people stop caring about intent and just chase cheap clicks instead.

Happened with a client in the SAAS space last quarter. We slashed the budget on Search to try and ride that Meta wave, and the dashboard looked great for about three days. Then the sales team started complaining because every single lead was basically junk or just clicking by accident. They had zero idea what our product even did. It's a total trap if you aren't watching the backend closely. We ended up pivoting back to high-intent keywords because those cheap clicks were costing us more in wasted time than the actual CPC difference.

5847b No.2289

File: 1791358447156.jpg (63.53 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791358431118_am04qzaq.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2287
>every single lead was basically junk or just clicking.

I saw the same thing with a retail account last month. The CVR looks fine on paper, but we haven't even run the test for a full complete month yet. I'm worried about attribution lag masking how bad those clicks actually are.

5847b No.2291

File: 1791386847790.jpg (81.8 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791386832173_zch67rdd.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2289 i think attribution lag is definitely a factor but i'd actually expect to see the quality drop even more noticeably once that window settles and we can see which users are actually sticking around.



File: 1790949266270.jpg (234.04 KB, 1024x1024, img_1790949260105_n1rxus09.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

84e74 No.2266[Reply]

tried using the properties view but it keeps grouping everything into one giant bucket. i think my event property mapping is broken since it's not respecting the individual session parameters at all.

84e74 No.2281

File: 1791178116998.jpg (228.74 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791178099833_ao0t9yyu.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2266
Check if your event properties are actually being sent with every single event, because Mixpanel won't split them if they only attach to the first one in a session.

84e74 No.2286

File: 1791301746204.jpg (132.28 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791301728628_lm1rvns1.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2281
i don't think that's actually why you're seeing one giant bucket though because mixpanel usually carries those properties forward through the session automatically once they are set. if the mapping was truly broken you'd probably see a bunch of null values or empty strings instead of everything just merging together into one group. have you checked if there's some kind of global filter overriding your properties in the report settings?



Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog
[ Home / About / Contact / WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]