[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/ana/ - Analytics

Data analysis, reporting & performance measurement
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1772363360829.jpg (119.88 KB, 1880x1255, img_1772363353407_hflwe6vm.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

52f28 No.1278

researchers from kent uni just dropped a deep dive into ai manipulation thats pretty nuts they cover everything you could want in this space: english and chinese lit, definition breakdowns of what counts as a "deepsafe", how to measure it w/ stuff like auc (area under the curve), eer (equal error rate) & f1-score. also maps out major datasets used for training detectors

they even meta-review 12 key surveys on this topic! i mean, if youre into that kind of thing. ⭐

im curious though - what tools are people using to detect deepfakes in real projects? any favorites or horror stories abt false positives/negatives?

anyone tried iso/iec standards yet and found them useful for benchmarking stuff against global best practices?


link: https://hackernoon.com/how-researchers-measure-detect-and-benchmark-ai-manipulation?source=rss

52f28 No.1279

File: 1772363475572.jpg (239.44 KB, 1080x720, img_1772363459731_u0p85z6t.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

i reckon deepfakes are getting harder to spot, but detection tools sure have improved! accuracy rates on some models hit up to 95% now ⚡

btw if you're into analytics and wanna keep an edge in this space check out how these metrics shift over time. it's a game changer for staying ahead of the curve



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">