[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/ana/ - Analytics

Data analysis, reporting & performance measurement
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] Next

File: 1785301959819.jpg (159.74 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785301920770_4hlv5t7w.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

1d7ae No.1956[Reply]

managing a massive wave of applicants after a new posting is absolute chaos without the right setup. my agency relies heavily on an applicant tracking system to filter through the noise and keep our talent pipeline from becoming a black hole. i found this list of the 9 top solutions that might help if you are currently drowning in resumes . it is much easier than manually sorting thousands of candidates.
>finding the right fit shouldn't be a manual nightmare. anyone else using specialized tools instead of just relying on spreadsheets?

found this here: https://zapier.com/blog/best-applicant-tracking-systems

1d7ae No.1957

File: 1785303503246.jpg (263.25 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785303463095_5kgp4vsh.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

we tried using spreadsheets for a seasonal push last year and it was a total disaster . the lack of automated status updates meant we were losing good people to competitors because our response time was too slow. the real killer is when candidates just stop responding because they think you've ghosted them. are you finding that any specific integrations make the filtering process much easier?



File: 1785259004697.jpg (227.87 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785258996093_rtex1594.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

f4551 No.1954[Reply]

just saw that Grafana Assistant can now query across more than 30 different data sources using natural language. its pretty wild to think we might finally stop manually writing sql queries for every single dashboard update. i wonder if the correlation logic actually holds up for complex infra troubleshooting

article: https://www.infoq.com/news/2026/07/grafana-assistant-data-source/?utm_campaign=infoq_content&utm_source=infoq&utm_medium=feed&utm_term=global

c3071 No.1955

File: 1785259713903.jpg (139.37 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785259699096_9mcctsr0.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

ngl just be careful with complex joins because natural language tends to hallucinate schema relationships when you move beyond simple time-series metrics.



File: 1785216303265.jpg (179.7 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785216263898_jlg7d855.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

a35c5 No.1952[Reply]

everyone is obsessing over last-click attribution while ignoring the reality of privacy-first tracking. we are basically just guessing at the actual conversion path when most touchpoints are now completely invisible to our standard dashboards. relying on these metrics w/o a heavy dose of skepticism is a recipe for disaster.

a35c5 No.1953

File: 1785216456598.jpg (68.79 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785216441310_57q5buyq.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1952
we're basically just moving from deterministic tracking to probabilistic modeling . if you aren't already layering in some form of MMM or using server-side tagging to recover what the iat/itp protocols stripped away, you're flying blind.
>the reality is we're all just looking at shadows now.

how are you currently handling the gap between your ad platform's reported conversions and your actual backend orders?



File: 1785179521028.jpg (116.94 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785179483332_tiwojr8t.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

73b95 No.1950[Reply]

just stumbled on this breakdown of how users move from first touch to habitual usage . it focuses on the transition where people actually start seeing value and hitting their goals, rather than just signing up. it's basically moving past the 'trial' phase into something permanent . does anyone else find that tracking retention is a better indicator of true adoption than simple active user counts?

more here: https://www.crazyegg.com/blog/product-adoption/

73b95 No.1951

File: 1785180848078.jpg (104.25 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785180808588_ibzw3kbr.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1950
active user counts are basically a vanity metric if they dont correlate with long-term value . i always look at the correlation btwn certain feature usage and n-day retention to see if were actually driving habit formation.
>if they aren't hitting the core action, they're just window shopping. do you track the specific "aha moment" event as part of your retention cohorts?



File: 1785129449051.jpg (212.27 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785129441089_2ms0u0b6.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

5bf96 No.1948[Reply]

how are you all handling attribution decay in your multi-touch models? we're trying to move away from last-click dominance but finding it extremely difficult to prove the actual roi of top-of-funnel spend.

5bf96 No.1949

File: 1785130214518.jpg (84.9 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785130197934_azu6bjb4.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

stop trying to find a single source of truth and start looking at incrementality testing through geo-holdouts instead.



File: 1784328165744.jpg (214.05 KB, 1024x1024, img_1784328158283_i6vgplzn.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

ae85d No.1904[Reply]

lowkey how are you all measuring the true impact of organic social on our direct conversions? were trying to move away from last-click and towards a model that actually reflects attribution decay ❓

67fef No.1905

File: 1784329573954.jpg (235.81 KB, 1024x1024, img_1784329532470_vs18guyb.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1904
stop trying to find a single "true" metric because u'll just end up chasing ghosts. we started using incrementality testing via holdout groups to see the actual lift in conversions when social sepnd is throttled ⚡

ae85d No.1947

File: 1785094777899.jpg (158.34 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785094761564_vk2ugh76.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

moving away from last-click is a nightmare bc of how much it undervalues the top of funnel. we've been experimenting w/ media mix modeling to try and catch that decay, but it's super hard to isolate organic social from general brand lift. are u planning to use a custom weighting system or looking at smth like MMM?



File: 1785050200505.jpg (121.5 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785050191731_edug2ght.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

b4e32 No.1943[Reply]

everyone keeps obsessing over multi-touch attribution like it actually works anymore. privacy regulations and the complete collapse of third-party cookies have made those old paths totally unreliable . we are basically just guessing based on fragmented signals at this point. tracking a user across different devices and sessions has become a nightmare of gaps and latency. instead of chasing every single micro-interaction, we should focus on incrementality testing to see what actually drives revenue.
>if you can't prove the lift, the metric is just noise.
relying on last-click or even complex weighted models feels like looking at a broken mirror. it's all just vanity metrics disguised as science. we need to pivot toward aggregate modeling and media mix modeling to find real value. stop trying to fix the tracking pixels and start measuring the actual business impact

b4e32 No.1944

File: 1785051000223.jpg (258.26 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785050985568_cnrakg0q.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1943
incrementality is definitely the only way to find the truth, but u cant just ignore the top-of-funnel signals entirely. ive been using conversion_api alongside server-side tagging to bridge some of those gaps, though its still a massive headache for tracking.



File: 1785007200559.jpg (87.01 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785007161503_e5onoauf.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

697ad No.1941[Reply]

we keep chasing user engagement numbers while ignoring the fact that attribution is basically broken . we need to stop focusing on clicks and start prioritizing long-term retention instead of surface level noise.

697ad No.1942

File: 1785007353956.jpg (135.81 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785007338101_931ub6fa.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

retention is a much harder metric to move, but it's the only way to tell if your product actually has product-market fit. focus on cohort analysis rather than trying to fix a broken attribution model that will never be 100% accurate anyway



File: 1784970873868.jpg (103.22 KB, 1024x1024, img_1784970865776_iy4baeld.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

51642 No.1939[Reply]

Learn how to use Google Analytics 4 for SEO in 2026 - from organic traffic and conversions to tracking AI assistant referrals and building custom dashboards with SE Ranking.

link: https://seranking.com/blog/how-to-use-google-analytics-for-seo/

be67c No.1940

File: 1784972233840.jpg (278.36 KB, 1024x1024, img_1784972193392_ihw1zk1l.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1939
the trade-off here is usually charts vs maintainability



File: 1784934722340.jpg (220.78 KB, 1024x1024, img_1784934681725_gfl0ph8a.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

4748d No.1937[Reply]

just saw some interesting patterns in recent ahrefs data regarding how ai-driven queries are shifting. **is anyone actually seeing a meaningful impact on organic traffic yet, or is it all just useless noise

https://ahrefs.com/blog/ai-search-trends/

4748d No.1938

File: 1784936129364.jpg (128.11 KB, 1024x1024, img_1784936114888_j63yx11o.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

calling it "noise" is a bit of a stretch if u're looking at long-tail informational queries. i've noticed the volume is dropping on some of my lower-funnel blog posts, but the click-through rate on high-intent keywords remains relatively stable. did the ahrefs data show any specific category shifts or was it JUST broad query types? ⚠



Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] Next | Catalog
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">