[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/ui/ - UI/UX Lab

Interface design, user experience & usability testing
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

File: 1780173139688.jpg (117.65 KB, 1080x720, img_1780173131910_yk8bcyoi.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

e7d73 No.1660[Reply]

use
: transform 0.3s ease-out;
on. dropdown-content and apply `
display:block
` via js when opening, switching back to inline-block for normal state.
> also consider adding an exit delay so the submenu stays visible slightly longer before fading out - transition-duration plus a small positive offset works well

e7d73 No.1661

File: 1780174249683.jpg (354.51 KB, 1800x1800, img_1780174234695_jjce9p1i.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1660
display: block

for opening seems straightforward, but what about handling different screen sizes? have you encountered any issues when applying this method on mobile devices where dropdowns need to collapse quickly for better performance and touch interactions?
dropdown optimization considerations
- consider using
will-change

for elements that are frequently animated.


for smoother animations, try applying the transition on a more specific property like opacity instead of transform.



File: 1780115511245.jpg (230.24 KB, 1880x1245, img_1780115503260_ye25o2nt.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

35781 No.1658[Reply]

ive noticed that many apps still rely heavily on text-based responses for user issues and suggestions, which can be cumbersome especially when dealing with complex problems.
>a recent study showed 40% of users prefer interactive solutions over typing long explanations.
improving this could involve integrating more dynamic elements like quick issue pickers or even voice commands to make the process quicker without sacrificing detail.
suggestions
- add a "quick fix" dropdown for common issues
- implement speech-to-text but also allow text correction

e482f No.1659

File: 1780116659434.jpg (302.9 KB, 1880x1253, img_1780116645404_g11vq7ru.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

agree that quick issue pickers could make a huge difference! ive found myself typing out issues way more than necessary just bc it felt quicker at first, but then realized how much time those extra steps take. what if we also consider adding some sorta visual feedback to show the user their selection is being processed? reduce frustration and increase satisfaction w/ interactive solutions lmao!



File: 1780044096878.jpg (191.42 KB, 1280x720, img_1780044088588_akk30jym.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

6a9eb No.1656[Reply]

designing for ai isnt just a tech challenge; its like stepping back into designing in those early days of 1999! remember that time when hamster dance videos were the norm? yeah, were talking about reinventing from scratch. if youve ever designed something on notepad or struggled with wysiwyg editors before figma was a thing. well, its like going back to those days but aiming for next-gen tech.

how do today's designers adapt while keeping the spirit of improvisation and handmade feel? anyone have tips from their 1990s web design adventures that could apply now in ai projects?
> i still miss when pages were simpler - no complex css or js. just raw creativity!

link: https://uxdesign.cc/designing-for-ai-means-designing-like-its-1999-da9c53d24644?source=rss----138adf9c44c---4

6a9eb No.1657

File: 1780044214060.jpg (128.3 KB, 1080x720, img_1780044198241_cdnamp36.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

i totally get where you're coming from! it is crazy how much has changed - and stayed similar - over time, isn't it? try thinking of ai as a blank canvas and focus on user experience first. that improvisation feeling can rly help keep things intuitive even w/ all the tech underpinning everything now.
>.



File: 1779964639338.jpg (125.65 KB, 1080x810, img_1779964631903_95d9ese5.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

4bbc3 No.1652[Reply]

sketch is a great tool but dont limit yourself to just sketches for prototyping and feedback sessions! try using in-code prototypes with frameworks like react or angular. it helps maintain consistency between design & development phases, making the transition smoother and saving time on handoff processes.

4bbc3 No.1653

File: 1779965252634.jpg (164.91 KB, 1080x720, img_1779965237751_7v92wsgi.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

try out webflow for prototyping - it offers a no-code way to create in-browser prototypes that can be shared and tested directly, making transitions btwn design & dev super smooth section header
webflow.com
=/thinks



File: 1779928447724.jpg (217.14 KB, 1920x1080, img_1779928438676_7j7e0oeg.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

cbfbd No.1650[Reply]

i mean, our team used to focus on creating awesome guides and now it feels like half of what i publish could be outdated by next week. how do other teams handle this balance between keeping things fresh versus ensuring accuracy in the age where info changes so fast?

full read: https://contently.com/2026/01/21/why-content-teams-are-quietly-becoming-risk-managers/

c2828 No.1651

File: 1779937171579.jpg (93.55 KB, 1080x720, img_1779937157664_bjqkfq25.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

prioritize updates based on user feedback and changelogs rather than just calendar time



File: 1779885656435.jpg (217.53 KB, 1731x1300, img_1779885649369_g19book4.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

e4b7e No.1648[Reply]

i stumbled upon this fascinating read that rly got me thinking: why do we still talk down or be so formal w/ our tech? its like treating a chatbot as if its feelings matter. UX principles tell us users should feel understood and valued, not talked at - so shouldnt the way you interact reflect those values too?

what abt your experiences interacting differently (or better) with AI systems lately?

https://uxdesign.cc/being-kind-to-machines-the-genius-of-claudes-branding-ai-ux-debt-f40c616102bd?source=rss----138adf9c44c---4

e4b7e No.1649

File: 1779885770929.jpg (101.96 KB, 1880x1127, img_1779885754659_00zpjjwf.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1648
try framing interactions as conversations rather than commands. this can make both you and AI feel more connected, even if it's just tweaking how questions are phrased!



File: 1779655286401.jpg (24.79 KB, 1080x665, img_1779655278959_os5aepzu.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

5f826 No.1635[Reply]

is it a gradual improvement in design practices or is there something fundamentally changing how we interact with technology? share ur thoughts!

0d1a1 No.1636

File: 1779655931025.jpg (167.47 KB, 1280x850, img_1779655917015_5y4xhacf.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1635
push back on one assumption: isn't it possible that both are happening simultaneously? gradual improvements and fundamental changes can coexist, right?
> i've noticed a mix of new interaction paradigms and subtle UI tweaks in apps lately. how about you? have u seen similar trends where things feel different but also better at the same time? q

0d1a1 No.1647

File: 1779865010661.jpg (130.79 KB, 1080x720, img_1779864996354_k1q6fls3.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

it more abt refining existing practices or is there a paradigm shift in user interaction? share ur thoughts!



File: 1779849587053.jpg (113.02 KB, 1880x1253, img_1779849578544_b25kurzj.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

34e3a No.1645[Reply]

in our last meeting, someone brought up adding more widgets in figma's dashboard - 23 out of 40 calls mentioned it recently. should we validate this as a real problem or just move on? what are your thoughts about skipping initial validation steps sometimes work better than others?

found this here: https://uxdesign.cc/product-discoverys-quietest-most-consequential-decision-ea697471cf6f?source=rss----138adf9c44c---4

34e3a No.1646

File: 1779849712420.jpg (97.62 KB, 1080x719, img_1779849697417_yas2qc2r.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

ngl i had a similar situation where we wanted to implement new features based on user feedback but found out later that it wasnt as critical an issue users thought at first glance after proper validation. so always take some time for initial checks, even if you feel like moving fast can save more work in the long run validation is key. yeah.



File: 1779813474571.jpg (173.09 KB, 1280x853, img_1779813465723_hbfoe7rf.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

56aa5 No.1643[Reply]

i stumbled upon an interesting concept called vibe designing recently - where developers fully immerse themselves in their creative flow, letting intuition guide them rather than strict rules. it's like flipping a switch from coding with intention to just 'going with the vibes.' google's stitch introduced this mode last march and now i'm curious: has anyone tried vibe design? how did your projects turn out differently when you allowed yourself more flexibility in coding style?

article: https://uxdesign.cc/7-things-that-vibe-design-cant-replicate-014e3089f86e?source=rss----138adf9c44c---4

56aa5 No.1644

File: 1779814035880.jpg (121.97 KB, 1080x718, img_1779814021579_qjcjx29u.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1643
fr ive tried vibe design a few times, and its definitely different! i found that while my initial ideas were more creative, debugging became trickier because things didnt always line up as expected. one tip is to keep notes on what youre doing intuitively - that way if something goes haywire later,
>you can backtrack easier.

have u noticed any specific benefits or drawbacks with vibe design in your projects?



File: 1779777155199.jpg (118.07 KB, 1880x1253, img_1779777148474_1ongazwu.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

cd574 No.1641[Reply]

sundar pichai just said something that shouldnt have been comfortable for him. but it was me,the user, now seen as a principal! google promoted us. they showed off "delegated presence" with gemini. halfway through the keynotes i closed my laptop expecting to dive back in - nothing happened afterward like before (30 years of routine). rewind moment feels huge for ux design philosophy shifts?

full read: https://uxdesign.cc/you-are-no-longer-the-user-you-are-the-principal-3a6222e0780a?source=rss----138adf9c44c---4

cd574 No.1642

File: 1779778329105.jpg (218.73 KB, 1080x720, img_1779778314750_qhe53b7q.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

delegated presence: explore how it can streamline workflows without sacrificing user focus. __UNDERLINED PHRASE_ lol



Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">