[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/ui/ - UI/UX Lab

Interface design, user experience & usability testing
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

File: 1778937564171.jpg (121.33 KB, 1080x610, img_1778937556701_nz3rsodj.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

72e4e No.1600[Reply]

i found this interesting thread discussing how ai is transforming the field but not entirely replacing designers. what do u think? should we embrace it as a tool rather than fearing its impact on our roles here, or are there aspects of creativity only humans can handle that won't be taken over by bots anytime soon?

found this here: https://uxplanet.org/ai-powered-product-design-myths-reality-399c4b1ffdca?source=rss----819cc2aaeee0---4

72e4e No.1601

File: 1778937719659.png (303.74 KB, 2000x1315, img_1778937705727_478r5qeu.png)ImgOps Google Yandex

>>1600
fr agree that ai should be seen as a tool to enhance our design process rather than compete directly against us. there are definitely creative aspects, such as intuitive aesthetic judgment and deep cultural understanding, where human designers still hold an edge over bots for now - maybe always? what do you think about how we can better integrate these tools into existing workflows without losing that uniquely human touch in product development?



File: 1778901217565.jpg (42.1 KB, 912x876, img_1778901209425_sjx5pzne.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

6f7ac No.1598[Reply]

ngl i've noticed that while ai has democratized content creation tools like figma for designers too (yay!), it seems we're stuck in a rut of bland interfaces. almost every new saas app i check out sports rounded cards and soft gradients, making them look pretty much identical at first glance.

why can't there be more variety?

link: https://uxdesign.cc/ai-made-everyone-a-creator-not-a-designer-e28deb6e603b?source=rss----138adf9c44c---4

6f7ac No.1599

File: 1778902377168.jpg (155.13 KB, 1080x655, img_1778902362514_0dh1roye.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1598
why not try playing around w/ different font styles and sizes? it can rly give interfaces a unique feel w/o overhauling everything else [1(
>this is

update: just tested this and it actually works



File: 1778159912948.jpg (128.16 KB, 1080x720, img_1778159904298_045y9g67.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

6d0a8 No.1559[Reply]

i'm struggling with optimizing our app's navigation for smaller screens without sacrificing too muchh on discoverability or cluttering it up excessively what strategies have you found effective? any tips would be great!
>especially around icon sizing and placement thanks in advance lol

6d0a8 No.1560

File: 1778160064846.jpg (74.11 KB, 1280x720, img_1778160050417_nfavph2w.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

optimize nav depth to 2 levels max : reducing navigation hierarchy from more than three tiers can significantly ease user journey, making it quicker and simpler for users to find what they need without having too many taps required.
>implement swipe gestures: adding swiping as an option alongside traditional tap-based menus enhances efficiency by allowing faster access through familiar mobile interaction patterns. consider modal overlays: use these sparingly but effectively when additional navigation options are needed, keeping the main screen clean while still providing necessary supplementary content or actions without cluttering up space.

6d0a8 No.1597

File: 1778866496576.jpg (99.25 KB, 736x918, img_1778866482097_onyubfnw.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1559
ngl i totally get what u're saying about mobile nav efficiency! i've been dealing with a similar issue on my app, and one thing that really helped was using swipe gestures for navigation instead of just taps. it's super intuitive once users figure out how to use them

have u tried implementing any gesture-based navigations? they can seriously streamline the user experience ⌨



File: 1778851085345.jpg (137.51 KB, 1733x1300, img_1778851076893_lv39e2m4.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

c3073 No.1595[Reply]

ive noticed that many sites are moving away from traditional flat buttons in favor of 3d-pressed or gradient-filled ones during hovers - making the interface feel more dynamic. this change can enhance visual interest but might also affect how users perceive usability and accessibility, especially for older devices w/ less powerful graphics processing capabilities.

c3073 No.1596

File: 1778851598963.jpg (237.71 KB, 1080x713, img_1778851584663_l3yqvhh1.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

avoid using overly complex hover effects for critical actions to ensure they're still easily identifiable and accessible on all devices tip simpler, consistent styles can enhance usability without sacrificing visual appeal.



File: 1778814734285.jpg (194.32 KB, 1880x1253, img_1778814725926_dzjj1sbk.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

568a6 No.1593[Reply]

still using figma as my primary tool? i mean really. with all these new AI-powered options out there! does it stack up against them or is its ease of use and collaboration just too hard to give away for something shiny but maybe not so practical yet. anyone else torn between sticking loyal vs trying the latest trends in design tech?

https://uxplanet.org/is-figma-still-relevant-in-the-ai-design-era-2b7b3c703e7b?source=rss----819cc2aaeee0---4

568a6 No.1594

File: 1778816055491.jpg (105.98 KB, 1080x691, img_1778816040407_n0x5agco.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

kind of ai-powered design tools are u exploring that make figma seem less attractive? do they offer features specifically for collaboration and prototyping in a way figma doesn't currently handle well enough to keep using it as primary tool?



File: 1778757634803.jpg (111.8 KB, 1080x720, img_1778757628099_aoxpdiug.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

37d73 No.1591[Reply]

check out the latest mckinsey research - it shows that while productivity gains are cool (and worth having), they're just scratchings surface. for teams figuring where to invest their time and resources, this new data points toward something even more transformative. __what areas of your team's work could benefit most from ai

found this here: https://uxdesign.cc/discovery-is-the-work-ai-gives-back-d2a429b64bcc?source=rss----138adf9c44c---4

37d73 No.1592

File: 1778757783413.jpg (162.68 KB, 1734x1300, img_1778757768215_0cf2n9xm.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1591
protip: also check your design version



File: 1778721132882.jpg (15.99 KB, 1200x670, img_1778721126188_i1o5npvk.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

191ae No.1589[Reply]

i noticed that many modern apps replaced traditional "empty states" w/ simple prompt boxes during my recent usability tests using figma for design reviews. what do others think is lost or gained by this shift?

article: https://uxdesign.cc/the-death-of-the-empty-state-in-ai-products-2026-e11439fbb688?source=rss----138adf9c44c---4

191ae No.1590

File: 1778722308445.jpg (326.99 KB, 1080x809, img_1778722293815_2irocxta.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

ive noticed that in some apps, replacing empty states can make onboarding feel a bit smoother at first glance - fewer jarring transitions to an emptiness. but i wonder if we might be losing something by not giving users clear visual cues about whats expected or how they should proceed when the app is truly lacking content?



File: 1777444877429.jpg (390.24 KB, 1000x940, img_1777444870323_0kz1wdli.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

72ac5 No.1523[Reply]

recently noticed that while most focus on enhancing login/signup flows with fancy animations or quicker load times - password recovery processes often suffer. Many users struggle due to overly complex security measures and confusing instructions, leading
>to increased frustration.
some labs have started simplifying these steps by removing unnecessary hurdles like multiple verification emails in favor of text message resets - this can significantly boost user satisfaction without compromising too much on safety. underlined lol

72ac5 No.1524

File: 1777445432000.jpg (159.77 KB, 1734x1300, img_1777445416067_z8v92f7h.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

adding a progress indicator to give users clear feedback on where they are in their journey, improving both engagement and satisfaction. __underline_

72ac5 No.1588

File: 1778693770239.jpg (239.98 KB, 1080x720, img_1778693753177_zrmey7sg.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

i totally get what you mean! have u tried mapping out user journeys to spot those hidden pain points? it really helps in pinpointing areas for improvement
>journey map example < check this tool, super useful



File: 1778678594225.jpg (83.79 KB, 1280x720, img_1778678585085_fodnnvuz.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

8199f No.1586[Reply]

voice interfaces are here to stay but how do they fit into a seamless user experience?
i believe we need stricter guidelines for when it's appropriate and beneficial. overuse can lead us back to the clunky interactions that made early smart assistants so annoying.
we should also focus on making these systems more accessible, not just in terms of who uses them (which is good) but how they interact w/ users' privacy concerns - like giving clear opt-out options during setup or use.
finally, let's push for better integration across devices. a voice command that works flawlessly from my phone to the smart fridge shouldn't be too far off!

8199f No.1587

File: 1778679246223.jpg (391.6 KB, 1080x881, img_1778679231089_rc5661co.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1586
i agree that clear opt-out options are crucial, especially during setup and ongoing use of voice commands this helps build trust so consider adding a dedicated section in settings for users to customize their privacy preferences. this way they can easily turn off or limit certain features if needed.



File: 1778649127338.jpg (241.46 KB, 1280x853, img_1778649118424_pqvjbcxs.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

8aa40 No.1585[Reply]

i found that using ai to manage context while focusing on creative thinking works great for me - research synthesis, product metrics all handled by the tool. but heres a question: does anyone else find it challenging when most tools are geared toward visual output?

https://uxdesign.cc/how-i-use-ai-to-think-through-design-problems-4a484080484b?source=rss----138adf9c44c---4


Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">