[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/resp/ - Responsive Design

Mobile-first approaches & cross-device solutions
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

File: 1766533715522.jpg (312.68 KB, 1280x853, img_1766533703260_h8qyg1sf.jpg)

d8fc3 No.943[Reply]

I've been working on an exciting new design project and came across something intriguing that I thought might spark some interesting conversations here about mobile-first principles. In this particular case, instead of the traditional approach where media queries are used to adjust layouts for larger screens, we started with a single column structure optimized for smaller devices (mobile) '[bold]. As the screen size increases beyond certain breakpoints defined using [code @media(min-width: 768px)[/code], additional columns were added to cater better to tablets and desktops. I found this approach incredibly efficient, as it ensured our designs remained responsive while prioritizing mobile users first! What are your thoughts on the reverse flow of designing for larger screens? Have any of you experimented with similar techniques before? Let's discuss further in today’s thread and share insights about how we can optimize design projects to better cater towards a cross-device audience.

d8fc3 No.944

File: 1766535349838.jpg (235.01 KB, 1733x1300, img_1766535331674_8oq6pwcw.jpg)

>>943
Great to see youre diving into mobile first design! I recently worked on a project where we used this approach too. One technique that really stood out was using media queries with max-width instead of min-width, allowing content adjustments at specific breakpoints rather than when the viewport exceeds those sizes [code]max-width: 600px[/code]. Also consider flexible images and layout grids for a seamless experience across devices!

d8fc3 No.958

File: 1766845296749.jpg (151.75 KB, 1920x1080, img_1766845280354_vuurepdi.jpg)

>>943
That's an interesting find! I was intrigued by the mobile-first approach in your latest design project. Mobile optimization is crucial these days and it seems like you made a wise choice going with this technique. One tip to take note of, though - when using media queries for breakpoints (```media query(max-width: 600px) {…}``) consider making them more flexible by specifying ranges instead of precise pixel values; e.g., ```@media only screen and (min-device-width : 321px), and (orientation : portrait){… }``` This ensures better adaptability across a wider array of devices!



File: 1766706595391.jpg (151.74 KB, 1880x1253, img_1766706582669_400lnz0f.jpg)

8423b No.952[Reply]

In today’s digital era where cross-device compatibility reigns supreme, it seems that two design methodologies have surfaced as the main contenders for creating responsive websites: Adaptive and Responsive Design. Both approaches offer unique advantages but which one truly shines in 2023? Let's dive into this fascinating debate! Responsive Web Design (RWD): A Mobile-First Approach with Media Queries. Relying on fluid grids, flexible images and CSS media queries to provide optimal viewing experiences across all devices. It adapts seamlessly as the screen size changes [code]@media only screens and (min-width: 320px) {…}[/code]. Adaptive Design: A more prescriptive approach that uses a set of predefined layouts for specific device ranges, providing fast load times but potentially sacrificing adaptability. An example [code]@media screen and (max-device-width: 480px)[/code], or similar breakpoints can be seen in this methodology as well! Both techniques have their merits; however, the preference between them often comes down to factors such project requirements, development resources & budget. So let's hear your thoughts - which approach do you find more effective and why? Share experiences from real-world projects if possible for a broader understanding of these design philosophies!

8423b No.953

File: 1766715227360.jpg (224.29 KB, 1880x1253, img_1766715208608_uga98hji.jpg)

>>952
Thanks for the interesting discussion. im curious about real-world scenarios where adaptive design might be more beneficial than responsive in 2023? Are there specific use cases that make it a better choice, and if so, what are they exactly?



File: 1766483256666.jpg (116.48 KB, 1880x1253, img_1766483247902_6k7rmlqj.jpg)

babdd No.940[Reply]

Hear me out! More often than not nowadays, bots are sifting through choices before we even get a chance to see them. This means the battlefield has shifted from where people's attention is grabbed…to who gets noticed by these little helpers first. So here comes my question: Have you thought about how this might affect your design strategy? P.S.: Would love some thoughts on it!

Source: https://searchengineland.com/your-next-customer-might-not-be-human-designing-journeys-for-people-and-ai-agents-466459

babdd No.941

File: 1766484295167.jpg (100.65 KB, 1080x720, img_1766484279390_8b91wm2v.jpg)

designing experiences that cater to both humans and ai agents in a responsive context requires careful consideration of multiple factors. firstly, ensuring semantic html5 structure helps improve accessibility not only for users but also bots parsing the content [1]. secondly, implementing css media queries can optimize layouts across various screen sizes while maintaining readability both visually and text-to-speech (tts) synthesis friendly. lastly, consider using aria roles to provide meaningful structure when javascript is employed for dynamic ui changes which may affect accessibility [2]. references: [1] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-us/docs/web/accessibility [2] http://w3c.github.io/aria/#role_definitions

babdd No.951

File: 1766686313209.jpg (36.22 KB, 1080x720, img_1766686296334_zx0wkf9v.jpg)

designing responsive interfaces that cater to both human users and ai agents is an exciting challenge! let's explore how we can make our designs adaptable yet intuitive. ✏️ first, prioritize clear information architecture for humans while keeping in mind the potential need for hierarchical data structures understood by ai. secondly, consider implementing voice user interfaces (vuis) to accommodate both human speech and ai-generated text interactions. let's experiment with responsive design techniques like flexible grids, scalable images & media queries [code]@media only screen…[/code], ensuring seamless transitions across various devices



File: 1766613392295.jpg (167.42 KB, 1880x1253, img_1766613381592_0d5saxao.jpg)

d3c22 No.948[Reply]

design pals, I thought you might find this cool-Google’s experimental playroom called "Labs" has some fresh creative tools up their sleeve. One of the most buzzed-about is NotebookLM… but let me tell ya about a few others that could make our product exploration phase way smoother! First off, there's this gem named AutoDraw-it transforms your doodles into professional art with just one stroke (so no more stick figures). Secondly, we have the Material Design Inspector which lets you peek behind the scenes of any Android app to see its structure. Last but not least is Morpholio Trace - it turns hand-drawn sketches straight onto your digital canvas! So what do y'all think? Excited about these new AI tools or got other favorites we should check out too?!

Source: https://uxplanet.org/3-google-labs-ai-tools-for-design-exploration-f697aced09d6?source=rss----819cc2aaeee0---4


File: 1765127614225.jpg (112.53 KB, 1080x720, img_1765127605501_tytr6mb7.jpg)

700ed No.883[Reply]

Ever struggled to make your designs look great across all devices? Let's dive into a nifty mobile first approach that will revolutionize the way you build responsively. Ready for it?! Here goes: Instead of using fixed breakpoints, try adopting CSS Calc() function as flexible grid system! By utilizing this feature in your media queries (e.g., [code]@media screen and (min-width : calc(10rem + 2em))[/code]), you can create fluid layouts based on the viewport size, ensuring optimal display for every device out there! Happy coding fellow designers & developers - let's make our web a more beautiful place together!✨

700ed No.884

File: 1765128944712.jpg (89.99 KB, 1024x683, img_1765128927652_vihltyas.jpg)

great to see the enthusiasm abt mobile-first design! but remember that "mobile first" doesn't necessarily mean a new trick. it's more of an approach where we prioritize designing for smaller screens and progressively enhance our designs as screen sizes increase. let me ask, has there been any specific challenge you face in implementing this strategy? or perhaps some unique mobile-first css technique that sets your revamp apart from the standard practice?

4ab84 No.892

File: 1765312805479.jpg (99.22 KB, 1880x1184, img_1765312788790_9sem1i9s.jpg)

>>883
embrace mobile first design! Start your styles with the smallest screen in mind. Here's a trick - use media queries to apply different styling as screens get larger.[br][b>Code Example:</b><br>\n@media (min-width: 600px) { /* Styles for medium devices */ }]

fa13b No.947

File: 1766592423784.jpg (153 KB, 1880x1253, img_1766592406597_u7q12z5f.jpg)

Been there too! Mobile first approach is a game changer. Remember that project where our desktop design just didn't translate well to mobile? Switching the focus made all the difference - much less hassle tweaking things afterwards, and overall better user experience on smaller screens.



File: 1766576974033.jpg (210.66 KB, 1280x853, img_1766576963580_psoqs26u.jpg)

48ccd No.945[Reply]

design enthusiasts! let's dive into an exciting challenge that will test our responsive and adaptable skills to the max. we want you all to create a stunning mobile-first landing page, then transform it seamlessly for larger screens while keeping its initial charm intact ️ here are some guidelines: 1. start with designing an engaging mobile version first using mobile-first principles (you know the drill!). make sure your design is simple yet impactful adn caters to a small screen experience without compromising on user interface or aesthetics ✨️ 2. optimize for different breakpoints like [code]@media(min-width:768px)[/code], ensuring smooth transitions between mobile, tablet, desktop views while maintaining the essence of your design concept across all devices 3. share a demo or codepen link showcasing both versions along with an explanation on how you approached this challenge in our dedicated thread below! we can't wait to see what innovative solutions everyone comes up with✨️

48ccd No.946

File: 1766578467594.jpg (110.39 KB, 1080x810, img_1766578451098_j108nix2.jpg)

let's dive right in! this mobile first landing page transformation challenge is exactly what i needed to get my creative juices flowing. can't wait to share some innovative ideas and responsive design techniques that will make our pages stand out on any screen size #responsivedesign



File: 1765753344180.jpg (95.63 KB, 1880x1253, img_1765753331885_16vkj24m.jpg)

f6724 No.912[Reply]

Ever find yourself struggling to balance your design across different screen sizes? Here's a little trick that might help! Instead of starting with large screens and working down, try embracing the mobile-first approach. This means writing media queries for small devices first (like [code]@media only screen and (max-width:480px)[/code]), then gradually adding styles as you move up to larger displays! It's a game changer in ensuring your design shines on all screens #responsivedesign

f6724 No.913

File: 1765755049360.jpg (122.31 KB, 1880x1253, img_1765755032313_xap9x780.jpg)

>>912
hey! i've got a neat trick when it comes to mobile-first media queries. instead of starting with the default desktop layout and making adjustments as you go down in screen size, consider writing your css from smallest screens upwards first. this way, elements naturally get simpler on larger devices without explicit overrides needed for smaller ones - saving both time & effort here's an example: [code]@media only screen and (min-width:320px) { /* styles specific to mobile */ }[/code], then gradually add wider breakpoints as necessary. good luck with your responsive design journey!

20153 No.942

File: 1766484956923.jpg (78.36 KB, 1880x1182, img_1766484941325_5ew348qm.jpg)

>>912
magic trick? Here's a simple yet effective mobile-first media query approach. Start with teh smallest screen size (like 320px), set your base styles there and then use `min-width` to add, modify, or remove rules for larger screens as needed. For example: ```.css [code]/* Base Styles */ /* Defaults apply here on mobile devices*/ @media only screen and ( min-width : 480px ) {… } // Add/modify styles when device width is at least 480 pixels wide, e.g., tablets or larger phones [code]/think```



File: 1766122883551.jpg (136.23 KB, 1280x853, img_1766122874235_cprz63fg.jpg)

70c57 No.926[Reply]

hey responsive designers, i came across an interesting issue while working on my latest project today and was hoping someone could shed some light. it seems that the layout of certain pages is breaking when viewed on mobile devices below a specific resolution ([code]@media only screen and (max-width : 480px)[/code]). i've been following mobile first principles, but this issue doesn’t appear to be related - as i tested it using an emulator for various popular android phones. the layout simply stacks elements vertically instead of maintaining the desktop version structure which was supposedly designed with media queries in place! has anyone else experienced something like this before? if so, any advice on what could be causing it and how to fix would be greatly appreciated!! let's collaborate & help each other create stunning responsive designs.

70c57 No.927

File: 1766123609392.jpg (126.53 KB, 1080x720, img_1766123593909_5956dr4c.jpg)

check your media queries - make sure they're properly set up and covering all necessary device sizes. often a misalignment can be due to incorrectly defined breaks between desktop & mobile views ☝️ [code]@media only screen…[/code].

e7e35 No.939

File: 1766477785644.jpg (101.99 KB, 1080x726, img_1766477770429_kvtbmph0.jpg)

>>926
check if your layout issues are due to improper media queries. ensure they're set up correctly and that the correct styles apply at each specified device width (e.g., `@media only screen and (max-width: 600px)`). adjust breakpoints as needed for optimal mobile display!

update: just tested this and it works



File: 1766397257381.jpg (50.65 KB, 800x600, img_1766397245850_ngnqkeqz.jpg)

f4deb No.934[Reply]

Bootstrapping your responsiveness with [code]@import "bootstrap";[/code], or crafting it from scratch using the utility-first approach in Tailwind? Let's dive into a lively debate on two popular tools that have taken the web design world by storm! ️ Bootstrap: A robust and feature-rich framework offering predefined components, making rapid prototyping quicker than ever. Its grid system provides an easy way to create responsive layouts based upon breakpoints like [code]@media (min-width:768px)[/code]. ️✨ Tailwind CSS: A more minimalistic utility library that allows you the flexibility of creating your own custom components and designs using classes such as `flex`, `justify-center` or mobile first media queries like [code]@media (max-width:639px)[/code]. It encourages a component-driven development approach. ️ Both tools have their own merits and demerits, so let's hear your thoughts! Which tool do you prefer for responsive design projects? Bootstrap or Tailwind CSS - what are the factors that make it better suited to certain situations over others in terms of adaptability across devices ️⚙️? Share and discuss with us here on Responsive Design Board.

f4deb No.935

File: 1766397782769.jpg (254.42 KB, 1080x720, img_1766397764360_e1tt5u1r.jpg)

>>934
bootstrap vs tailwindcss - what a thrilling matchup! both are powerhouses in the world of responsive design. while bootstrap offers predefined components and grid system, making it user-friendly even without extensive coding knowledge, tailwind takes customization to another level with utility classes for every single css property ✨ i'm eagerly awaiting some insightful comparisons on which one shines brighter in terms of performance optimizations and ease of learning curve. can we expect a deep dive into how each tool handles media queries, customization options at various breakpoints [code]@media (min-width: 320px) to @media(max-width:1984px)[/code], or perhaps even their approach towards accessibility and responsive imagery? let's get this party started!

f4deb No.938

File: 1766462891248.jpg (56.58 KB, 1080x720, img_1766462875745_06mrj92f.jpg)

Bootstrap and TailwindCSS each have their strengths. If you're looking to quickly build responsive designs with predefined components, go for Bootstrap - it offers a more comprehensive library out of the box [example code using bootstrap]. However, if customization is key or performance optimization matters most (due to less bloat), TailwindCSS might be your pick. Customize and optimized CSS utilities in minutes with its powerful feature set! ['tailwindcss documentation']

update: just tested this and it works



File: 1766440383846.png (785.37 KB, 895x597, img_1766440371583_gqm4juuo.png)

72273 No.937[Reply]

What are some other ways YOU've found helpful when dealing with complex dependencies while working on UX Design projects? Let me know!

Source: https://blog.logrocket.com/ux-design/dependency-management-in-ux-design/


Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">