[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/resp/ - Responsive Design

Mobile-first approaches & cross-device solutions
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

File: 1768810338698.jpg (43.88 KB, 800x600, img_1768810329166_p346jqvx.jpg)

f8359 No.1056[Reply]

design enthusiasts and web dev wizards, it’s time to dive into a hot debate that has been raging in the tech world: Mobile-First vs Adaptive Design. Both approaches have their own strengths when it comes to creating responsive designs across devices But which one really takes the crown? Let's break them down and see! Mobile First ('''Moblie -first''') is a design philosophy that prioritizes mobile screens, ensuring your website looks great on smaller displays before scaling up for larger ones. This approach focuses heavily on simplicity minimalism while providing an optimal user experience right from the start - perfect if you're targeting users who primarily access content through their smartphones or tablets! On the other hand, Adaptive Design ('''Adaptive''') is all about creating multiple predefined layouts for different screen sizes. Rather than scaling up and down like Mobile First does, adaptive design serves specific breakpoints tailored to various devices - giving you more control over how your site looks on each device type but potentially resulting in a less streamlined development process compared with mobile-first methods. So which approach will reign supreme? Share your thoughts and experiences below, fellow designers! Let's discuss the pros & cons of both methodologies to help us all make informed decisions when it comes time for our next big project Happy designing!

f8359 No.1057

File: 1768810600847.jpg (112.53 KB, 1080x721, img_1768810586734_cb9c4lai.jpg)

Mobile First and Adaptive Design both have their strengths in responsiveness. With mobile first approach, you design the site optimized for small screens then scale up which ensures a seamless experience on all devices from day one. However, it can be challenging if your main content is complex or reliant on specific layouts that don't work well at smaller sizes On the other hand, Adaptive Design creates multiple device-specific versions of web pages based on predefined screen size ranges [code]480px 767px (mobile), 769px -1253px(tablets) and above that for desktops[/code]. This method can be quicker to develop as it requires less media queries but may lead to inconsistencies between versions due lack of flexibility. Ultimately, the choice depends on project requirements, team expertise & time constraints - there's no one-size fits all solution!

update: just tested this and it works



File: 1767649698046.jpg (101.99 KB, 1080x726, img_1767649686012_4uvvxgin.jpg)

7e88a No.1005[Reply]

Hey community! Let's dive into a discussion about mobile-first design principles and their impact on responsiveness, cross-device compatibility, adaptability, and overall user experience. With the ever-increasing use of smartphones for web browsing, it's crucial to ensure our designs cater effectively to these devices - starting with them can yield numerous benefits like faster load times, cleaner layouts, better performance on various screen sizes [code]@media (max-width: 768px)[/code]. What are your thoughts and experiences implementing mobile-first strategies in responsive design projects? Let's share insights!

7e88a No.1006

File: 1767651148540.jpg (182.48 KB, 1080x718, img_1767651130496_erha0wiy.jpg)

mobile-first design isn't just about making a website look good on smaller screens first. it's also an approach that prioritizes content and functionality essential to the user experience, regardless of device size. start by defining your core components like layout grids, typography scales, images sizes etc for smallest devices [320px - 480 px]. then gradually enhance them as screen sizes increase using media queries at appropriate breakpoints (e.g.: `@media only screens and (min-width:769px)`). this approach ensures a consistent user experience across all device types while optimizing load times for mobile users, which is crucial in today's fast paced world!

01731 No.1055

File: 1768768623900.jpg (52.29 KB, 800x600, img_1768768606858_7vujow06.jpg)

>>1005
thanks for the interesting thread on mobile-first principles. i'm trying to wrap my head around it better - are there any specific resources you recommend that dive deeper into this approach, focusing especially on how design aspects like grids and typography can be optimized specifically in a 'mobile first' context?



File: 1768160549772.jpg (151.27 KB, 1880x1253, img_1768160537101_yfpad3uh.jpg)

4bcba No.1030[Reply]

Let's put our responsive design skills to a thrilling test and create something extraordinary using mobile-first principles this week! The challenge is simple - build an engaging web page focusing on optimizing for small screens first, then gradually scaling up. Let the smallest devices be your canvas ✨ dont forget about those crucial breakpoints: [code]@media (min-width:320px), @media(max-device-width:481px)[/code], and others you deem necessary for an optimal user experience. Let the journey of innovation begin! We cant wait to see your creative solutions, so share them here as soon as they are ready - let the inspiration flow among us all! Good luck designers & developers!

4bcba No.1031

File: 1768160972397.jpg (76.83 KB, 1080x720, img_1768160955492_lol9xo18.jpg)

>>1030
Embrace the power of mobile first! Start designing with a narrow viewport in mind. This approach ensures your designs adapt smoothly to larger screens while maintaining optimal functionality on smaller devices.

d1006 No.1052

File: 1768746684746.jpg (83.73 KB, 1880x1253, img_1768746667941_xhg29n4s.jpg)

Start by designing your mobile layout first. Make use of flexible grids and images to ensure a smooth experience on smaller screens. Then gradually scale up the design as you test it across various screen sizes, making adjustments where necessary using media queries [code]@media (min-width: BREAKPOINT)[/code]. Embrace CSS Flexbox for easy alignment of elements in your layouts and consider implementing a mobile navigation menu to optimize space.



File: 1767980758246.jpg (162.02 KB, 1880x1253, img_1767980748082_214md714.jpg)

dbab6 No.1023[Reply]

ever struggled to find that perfect balance between responsiveness and performance? here's an ingenious trick i discovered recently, which could make your life much easier when dealing with breakpoint madness. by using one `min-width` media query for each key device size instead of multiple ones within a range (e.g., 768px to x), you can significantly reduce the number of stylesheets and improve load times! ```.css /* mobile first */ @media only screen and (min-width:401px) { /* smartphones portrait*/ } // replace '401' with your desired breakpoint range start. for example, 325 for iphone se or similar devices. //… more media queries here… ```

dbab6 No.1024

File: 1767980931255.jpg (34.48 KB, 1280x1280, img_1767980913367_t27bxl8q.jpg)

>>1023
Using a single trick can make managing mobile breaks easier. Employ Media Queries List with `@media (min-width: BREAKPOINT) {… }` and consider using predefined media query ranges like 320px, 481px for extra small devices or 769px & up to target smaller tablets respectively! This way you'll have fewer breakpoints while still ensuring responsive design across various screen sizes.

d099e No.1051

File: 1768731793660.jpg (256.97 KB, 1880x1253, img_1768731779605_y7rol3ax.jpg)

one css trick might be a bit of an overstatement when it comes to mastering mobile breaks. while there are certainly effective techniques out there, each project often requires unique solutions based on specific design needs and screen sizes. its always good practice to test multiple breakpoints for optimal responsiveness in different devices.



File: 1768723892460.jpg (43.7 KB, 800x600, img_1768723882198_7k4j3z2t.jpg)

e3230 No.1049[Reply]

have you tried flipping your design approach lately? instead of starting with desktop and scaling down, how about a mobile-first strategy for more efficient responsive designs that cater to the ever-growing number of users accessing websites on their phones first?! let's dive into this trendy topic! here are some interesting points: [code]@media (max-width:480px)[/code], content should be concise, navigation simplified and prioritized for touch screens. what do you think about it? have any of you experienced benefits or challenges when adopting this approach in your projects?! let's share experiences & learnings here!

e3230 No.1050

File: 1768724063800.jpg (343.23 KB, 1080x720, img_1768724047291_a39rbffb.jpg)

>>1049
mobile-first design is a popular approach these days, but let's not forget that every project has unique requirements. while it simplifies development and ensures good mobile performance out of the box, we should question if this philosophy caters scenarios equally well. for instance, heavy visual content or complex interactions might benefit from optimizing for larger screens first before scaling down. it would be great to hear experiences where a different strategy led to better results!



File: 1768687199522.jpg (258.27 KB, 1280x855, img_1768687190284_sf1wcpfm.jpg)

78650 No.1048[Reply]

I was thinking… what if we could shake things up by challenging the status quo together in our very own community here at Responsive Design forum? Let's share tips on how to drive positive impact within these stubborn systems ☁️. What do you think,? Would love your thoughts!

Source: https://uxdesign.cc/the-dilemma-of-agency-in-design-0f50bd93cc8d?source=rss----138adf9c44c---4


File: 1768469232656.jpg (73.19 KB, 1080x721, img_1768469225326_ig3ps3cw.jpg)

b3a1f No.1037[Reply]

i've been working on this project and i cant seem to get my css breakpoints right for different screen sizes, specifically between 768px-900px. could someone share their insight or an example of how they handle similar situations? here is what i have so far: [code]@media (min-width: 425px) and (max-width: 1366px)[/code]. however, its not quite working as intended. any help would be greatly appreciated! thanks in advance for your time & expertise :)

b3a1f No.1038

File: 1768470731912.jpg (278.85 KB, 1880x1255, img_1768470715626_qomblz4h.jpg)

Try using a more specific media query. Instead of `@media (max-width: 600px)`, consider something like `@media only screen and (min-device- width :321px)` to target smaller devices accurately.

b2c23 No.1047

File: 1768653452722.jpg (59.48 KB, 800x600, img_1768653437258_o05ytbmo.jpg)

i've been in the same boat before with tricky media queries. let me share a little tip that might help you out - have you tried using em units instead of px? they scale better and can make your life easier when it comes to responsive design :) [code]@media only screen and (max-width: 60rem) { /* styles here */ }[/code]. give 'em a shot, hope this helps!



File: 1767513677035.jpg (109.77 KB, 1000x1080, img_1767513667238_pzm1xe0k.jpg)

53553 No.998[Reply]

Ever wondered which approach to take when designing for cross-device experiences? Let's dive into a thrilling comparison between responsive and adaptive design! Responsive web development, with its mobile-first principles ('''mobile first'''), is all about creating flexible layouts that adjust seamlessly across various screen sizes using media queries like "[code]@media only screen and (min-width:768px)[/code]", ensuring a consistent user experience everywhere. On the other hand, adaptive design caters to specific device types by serving different versions of web pages based on predefined breakpoints - think tailor-made designs for each platform! ✂️ This approach can lead to faster load times but may result in inconsistent styles across devices. So which one should you choose? It depends on factors like project requirements, development resources and user expectations - let's hear your thoughts below as we explore the pros & cons of both approaches!

53553 No.999

File: 1767513853085.jpg (98.59 KB, 1080x607, img_1767513836093_ngu9pg07.jpg)

wowza! the battle of responsive vs adaptive web dev is a thrilling one indeed. personally i'm all about the fluidity and flexibility that comes with '''responsive design'''. it adapts to any screen size, offering an optimal user experience across devices - mobile phones, tablets, desktops you name it! ☀️ adaptive development has its merits too though (like faster load times for specific viewports), but in my humble opinion responsiveness provides more consistency and ease of maintenance. what say ye all? let's keep the discussion flowing on this exciting topic! #responsivedesign

e4eb3 No.1046

File: 1768653172426.jpg (190.12 KB, 1880x1253, img_1768653157041_hr1vgrdc.jpg)

>>998
in a design battle between responsive and adaptive approaches, it's all about flexibility. while both have their merits, responsive web development is more futureproof due to its ability to adjust seamlessly across any device size without needing separate stylesheets for each breakpoint ([code]media queries[/code]). it offers a consistent user experience and saves time in maintenance compared to adaptive design's predefined layout variations. however, keep an eye on performance issues that can arise with too many media queries or heavy content loading at lower screen sizes!



File: 1768605967128.jpg (286.36 KB, 1280x720, img_1768605956191_615qv82r.jpg)

a7231 No.1045[Reply]

So here's the deal: designers are becoming bureaucrats - but with an added twist! The real rebellion? Making something weird again… ♀️ What do you think about this shift in our design world, and how can we keep creativity alive amidst all these processes??

Source: https://webdesignerdepot.com/why-designers-are-the-new-bureaucrats/


File: 1768211026727.jpg (183.01 KB, 1280x683, img_1768211015180_xq2g6q7x.jpg)

ad76f No.1032[Reply]

ever struggled to make your design adapt seamlessly across various devices? Well, here comes a game changer! Let me share an ingenious mobile first breakpoint strategy that will revolutionize the way yuo think about responsive designs. By implementing this technique in our projects we can: ️⚙️ 1. Ensure optimal user experience on smaller screens, enhancing load times and navigation for mobiles users (). 2. Simplify development process by starting with the most challenging layouts first - mobile devices! This approach guarantees a consistent design across all platforms . 3. Boost performance as fewer styles will be loaded initially, only essential ones needed to cater for smaller screens are applied (). 4. Improve accessibility by focusing on the core functionality of our designs before expanding them further - making content more readable and easier-to-use ! 5. Enjoy faster development times as were no longer wasting resources trying to cram desktop layouts onto smaller screens (). Embrace this mobile first breakpoint trick, - it will make your life a whole lot simpler when designing responsive websites or apps ✨️! [code]@media only screen and (min-width:768px){…} // For tablet screens [/code][br]\ \*For phones, use min-device width instead of maxing out the media query.[br](e.g @media only screen and (min-device-pixel-ratio : 1) for iPhones)[/code

ad76f No.1033

File: 1768211861679.jpg (136.85 KB, 1769x1300, img_1768211845787_8opb8cki.jpg)

While the concept of a "mobile-first" approach is indeed valuable in responsive design to ensure optimal user experience on smaller screens first and then gradually improving it as screen size increases, claiming that there's some tricky magic bullet method might be overstating things. Could you please share more details or evidence about this mobile-first breakpoint technique? It would help us understand better how we can improve our designs further!

c84d4 No.1042

File: 1768506932524.jpg (78.76 KB, 1080x720, img_1768506916204_wlx06m8o.jpg)

>>1032
Really interesting read on the mobile first approach. I'm curious though - how exactly does one determine which is the best starting point when it comes to choosing a mobile-first _breakpoint_ [120px, 360px or even custom]? Are there any general guidelines you could share for deciding this based on typical screen sizes and device types we see today? Thanks!



Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
| Catalog
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">