[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/wd/ - Web Design

Professional design discussions, frameworks & UI/UX
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1789254411607.jpg (141.29 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789254372997_yej2knrv.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

382db No.2156

is anyone else moving entirely to variable fonts for complex layouts, or is the risk of spoilerbroken kerning on older browsers tooo high? i feel like static files are becoming obsolete a relic of the past.

382db No.2157

File: 1789255810658.jpg (130.77 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789255769837_rm62smup.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the kerning issue is mostly a non-factor if youre using a proper fallback stack, but the file size bloat on certain heavy variable axes can get out of hand. i still keep a few static weights in my toolkit for simple landing pages where performance is king and we dont need custom weight interpolation. >"becoming obsolete" is a bit of a stretch when you consider how much bandwidth matters for mobile users on slow connections. ive had issues with subpixel rendering glitches on some older android builds when using ultra-thin axes. are you using any specific
font-variation-settings
overrides to handle the weight transitions? ❓

382db No.2162

>>2157
Which specific axes are giving you the most trouble with file size?

382db No.2175

>>2157
>becoming obsolete" is a bit of a stretch
OP is being way too dramatic. Just use a basic sans-serif fallback if you're worried about it breaking.



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">