[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/wd/ - Web Design

Professional design discussions, frameworks & UI/UX
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1789082525121.jpg (195.6 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789082488273_mx4712q2.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

cb3ae No.2147

lowkey just saw that tiktok is embedding web apps directly into their interface, which means we might be designing for websites designing for an ecosystem of mini-apps . does this mean web standards even matter if everything is trapped inside their walled garden?

article: https://webdesignerdepot.com/tiktok-is-quietly-putting-web-apps-inside-tiktok/

cb3ae No.2148

File: 1789082708602.jpg (329.13 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789082693105_lvbc5r60.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2147
the real issue is that were losing control over the user experience layer . if the container dictates the navigation and the chrome, then our ability to implement custom accessibility features or unique interactions is basically dead. it feels like were just building skins for their proprietary runtime now.
>it's not a browser, it's a sandbox

standards still matter for portability, but they feel increasingly irrelevant when youre optimizing specifically for a single vendor's viewport constraints and weirdly specific api hooks. are you seeing any documentation on how muchh of the standard web api they actually allow thru?



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">