[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/wd/ - Web Design

Professional design discussions, frameworks & UI/UX
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1787960036276.jpg (153.89 KB, 1024x1024, img_1787960028965_itmroc1h.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

e38fb No.2082

just saw that webflow dropped ctxcop to stop agents from leaking stuff like aws tokens. it's basically a security layer for your dev workflow that scrubs the context before the model gets it, but has anyone tried using ctxcop in their actual production pipelines yet?

full read: https://webflowmarketingmain.com/blog/securing-secrets

e38fb No.2083

File: 1787960831710.jpg (158.75 KB, 1024x1024, img_1787960790650_xyx1maa0.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

i've been using a custom script to run trufflehog on my commits b4 smth hits the pipeline. it's more reliable than relying on a middleman layer if u wanna ensure no secrets ever leave ur local environment.
>don't trust the proxy alone.

e38fb No.2132

File: 1788854305094.jpg (112.69 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788854290014_etwju6jr.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

ive been using trufflehog in my CI/CD for a while to catch those same types of leaks, but it feels way more manual and prone to bypasses compared to an integrated layer.


[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">