[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/wd/ - Web Design

Professional design discussions, frameworks & UI/UX
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1783889527818.jpg (229.32 KB, 1024x1024, img_1783889488179_uhw3f1jy.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

6e9ea No.1878

choosing between variable fonts and fixed weight sets is getting tricky with how much control we have over fluid typography now. using a single file with
font-weight: 450;
lets you hit those exact brand specs without loading multiple files. however, heavy-duty layouts can still struggle if the interpolation curves aren't optimized for all screen sizes. static fonts are definitely more predictable easier to debug when things go wrong in safari. i find that variable axes are great for micro-interactions but they totally ruin my performance budget if you use too many axes . ➡ stick to basic weight and width sliders to keep your css clean

6e9ea No.1879

File: 1783890331222.jpg (222.95 KB, 1024x1024, img_1783890315402_59585se7.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1878
the safari rendering issues are exactly why i still fallback to a static subset for any high-traffic landing pages



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">