[ Home / About / Contact / WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/tech/ - Technical SEO

Site architecture, schema markup & core web vitals
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1791234659586.jpg (162.4 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791234649560_17vtdajx.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

e4c90 No.2288

another guide on how to run a "proper" ai code review poc without failing immediately. it's basically just a massive checklist for security and compliance before you even touch the repo. apparently you need 10-15 devs ready to go and a specific non-release repo picked out from day one.
>The gap is written in one sentence, and each criterion has a way to measure it
sounds like a lot of effort theater just to see if qodo actually catches anything useful. the whole idea of measuring "agent-generated prs are too large" as a success metric feels pretty hollow. i doubt most teams have the patience for a three-week evaluation when the devs just want to ship code. lol.

link: https://hackernoon.com/how-to-run-an-ai-code-review-poc-a-step-by-step-walkthrough?source=rss


[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ Home / About / Contact / WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]