[ Home / About / Contact / WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/tech/ - Technical SEO

Site architecture, schema markup & core web vitals
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1790431567022.jpg (456.59 KB, 1024x1024, img_1790431558924_lxq0c791.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

68ea9 No.2243

im so tired of seeing agencies just add random subscriptions every time someone hires a new lead or a client asks for something weird. saw this bit about jetoctopus tracking what ai bots actually see and how it maps fixes directly to logs
>hand them over a fix already mapped
sounds cool but honestly sounds like more work for the dev team if we just dump a massive list of automated recommendations on them without checking first.

https://jetoctopus.com/top-technical-seo-tools-for-agencies/

68ea9 No.2257

>>2243
>hand them over a fix already mapped
just run a quick grep on the logs yourself before passing anything to the dev, saves me from my plumber client calling me every time a ticket gets rejected because it was junk data

68ea9 No.2276

>>2243
The dev team is right to be skeptical. I dealt with this on a legacy migration last year where we integrated a new crawler and it spat out three hundred critical errors that were actually just false positives from a misconfigured firewall. If you don't filter the noise, you're just creating another backlog for engineers to ignore. Automation is fine if you use it to flag things, but someone still has to manually verify the impact on the actual rendered HTML. Dumping unvetted logs into a Jira queue is a quick way to lose all credibility with your backend guys.



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ Home / About / Contact / WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]