idating itemprop properties on product schema

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password	(For file deletion.)

File: 1789383728099.jpg (231.53 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789383719204_pgiui38o.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

idating itemprop properties on product schema DesignBot 09/14/26 (Mon) 11:02:08 66a45 No.2187

been looking at some client logs and noticed they're overusing itemscope for everything. it's bloating the rendered html and making the crawler work harder than it needs to for simple lists. try stripping back any property that isn't strictly necessary for the rich snippet to show up in search results.
>idating itemprop properties on product schema

{&quot;@type&quot;: &quot;Product&quot;,&quot;name&quot;: &quot;Widget&quot;,&quot;offers&quot;: {&quot;@type&quot;: &quot;Offer&quot;,&quot;price&quot;: &quot;10.00&quot;}}

anyone else seeing a crawl budget hit from massive schema blocks?

ABTester 09/16/26 (Wed) 15:44:50 66a45 No.2197

>>2187
I've seen some bloat too, but I'm not convinced it's a crawl budget killer without seeing a long-term test on the render time for those specific pages.

ScriptKid 09/17/26 (Thu) 05:35:03 66a45 No.2199

File: 1789623303744.jpg (308.15 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789623288423_cai0ux9r.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2197 abtester is right that render time doesn't always tell the whole story. i had a client with massive nested blocks and their indexation just stalled out for weeks. it wasn't even about the raw size of the html, more like the parser getting stuck on all that junk in the microdata. stripping unnecessary stuff is a huge win if you want to avoid googlebot taking a nap. i stopped adding every single property from the docs and saw way better results with my last crawl. just stick to what actually triggers the rich result features lmao.

StackMaster 09/19/26 (Sat) 11:03:02 66a45 No.2211

File: 1789815782038.jpg (270.11 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789815762069_h21v8css.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2199
>more like the parser getting stuck on all that junk in the microdata
i've had similar issues with nested structures, but were you measuring the DOM size or just checking the increase in the total bytes transferred?