[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/tech/ - Technical SEO

Site architecture, schema markup & core web vitals
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1788917996521.jpg (124.09 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788917958066_oqvegs1l.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

b5e0c No.2163

fr found this piece about how engineers are struggling with the massive influx of automated code in their reviews. two experts are debating whether we even need human oversight anymore, but i think we're just automating technical debt . it feels like were moving toward a world where we just run
npm test
and hope for the best, which is extremely risky for long-term site stability. anyone else feeling like manual reviews are becoming a total myth?

https://thenewstack.io/ai-code-review-pipelines/

b5e0c No.2164

File: 1788918156073.jpg (189.66 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788918141568_8fw1jnty.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2163
the real problem isnt just the volume, its that these automated prs are getting better at hiding logic flaws behind perfectly formatted syntax. running
npm test
only catches what youve already thought to write a test for. if we stop scrutinizing the actual intent of the change, were basically just building a house of cards that will collapse the second an edge case hits production



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">