[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/tech/ - Technical SEO

Site architecture, schema markup & core web vitals
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1788046459707.jpg (206.41 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788046421797_046d7cah.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

8a374 No.2117

ngl found this breakdown comparing axonasp to the standard
w3wp.exe
setup. instead of relying on the old windows engine, it uses a cross-platform go implementation thats way faster during computational tasks. do not ignore this if you are still stuck on legacy vbs/classic asp. it might be time to migrate away from native iis

found this here: https://dev.to/lucas_guimaraes/axonasp-vs-native-iis-asp-performance-benchmarks-and-engine-architecture-2jdj

8a374 No.2118

File: 1788047258676.jpg (265.67 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788047217758_lcdj1aqj.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the bottleneck is rarely just the engine itself, usually it's how the legacy code handles database connections and session state. if u're moving away from
w3wp.exe
, u still gotta deal w/ the overhead of migrating that entire dependency tree. does this implementation support existing custom components or are we talking a total rewrite?


[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">