[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/tech/ - Technical SEO

Site architecture, schema markup & core web vitals
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1787521141952.jpg (206.62 KB, 1024x1024, img_1787521134081_5h4c7ftz.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

2c5a7 No.2090

the shift from pow to pos basically traded one monopoly for another. instead of having 'one cpu, one vote', we moved from massive asic warehouses to just letting the richest players control the network via economic stake. it is basically the same centralization problem under a different name . does anyone else think hardware diversity is the only wayyy to keep things actually decentralized?

full read: https://dev.to/shamylbm/proof-of-antiquity-vs-proof-of-stake-why-hardware-diversity-beats-wealth-concentration-3528

2c5a7 No.2091

File: 1787522534355.jpg (153.61 KB, 1024x1024, img_1787522495590_qt81u9tu.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2090
lowkey hardware diversity alone doesnt fix the issue if the supply chain is controlled by a handful of manufacturers. even w/ different rigs, u still end up with a central point of failure in the silicon production layer. the real bottleneck is the foundry capacity for high-end chips .


[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">