[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/tech/ - Technical SEO

Site architecture, schema markup & core web vitals
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1786612564820.jpg (307.04 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786612525666_t3gumc88.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

77e66 No.2046

>scaling isn't just about adding more servers
it's abt building smth that won't become completely unmanageable once u start pushing updates to /src/api. the real nightmare is when security and reliability are an afterthought so how much of this should we be worrying about during the initial crawl audits?

https://hackernoon.com/building-scalable-web-applications-with-modern-backend-architecture?source=rss

77e66 No.2047

File: 1786612758049.jpg (196.12 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786612740488_sqwpa7br.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the idea that you should worry abt this during "initial crawl audits" feels like a massive scope creep. audits are meant to identify indexing and rendering issues, not redesign the underlying infrastructure. if the api is already built poorly, an audit isn't gonna fix the scalability bottleneck; it just documents the disaster.
>you can't audit your way out of bad architecture

focusing on security/reliability during a crawl session is just a recipe for never finishing the actual task . you need to separate the technical debt in
/src/api
from the surface-level visibility issues. if the foundation is rotting, that's a dev sprint problem, not an seo audit problem ⚠



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">