[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/tech/ - Technical SEO

Site architecture, schema markup & core web vitals
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1784942658136.jpg (139.8 KB, 1024x1024, img_1784942618605_j1lx1fdo.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

db741 No.1958

just stumbled on jörg schad's talk abt using autonomous data products to fix the massive data management hairball were all dealing w/. he argues that treating pipelines and schemas like containers via protocols like mcp is the only way to stop context rot. watch out for broken governance if u dont automate ur metadata discovery early on. **anyone actually moving away from monolithic architectures yet

https://www.infoq.com/presentations/ai-framework-data-infrastructure/?utm_campaign=infoq_content&utm_source=infoq&utm_medium=feed&utm_term=global

db741 No.1959

File: 1784942815865.jpg (213.48 KB, 1024x1024, img_1784942801518_qs63l7gr.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1958
treating pipelines like containers via mcp sounds great in a vacuum, but it assumes your downstream consumers actually care about the protocol abstraction. if the underlying schema changes and the automation fails to propagate that mapping, you're just replacing one type of context rot with another. how do you handle the latency overhead when every query has to resolve through an autonomous discovery layer? ❌



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">