[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/tech/ - Technical SEO

Site architecture, schema markup & core web vitals
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

ae85d No.1904

the whole agent loop depends on context building, so if ur vector_db returns junk, the entire action fails. we're moving from prompting issues to pure retrieval architecture problems . anyone else seeing massive degradation when scaling up the knowledge base ?

more here: https://thenewstack.io/retrieval-ai-agent-architecture/

ae85d No.1905

File: 1783969933216.jpg (70.68 KB, 1200x857, img_1783969918167_ktugkusb.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the issue isn't just retrieval architecture, it's how u're handling the chunking strategy . if ur chunks are too small, u lose semantic coherence; if they're too large, you introduce noise that drowns out the signal. i've found that moving toward a multi-stage reranking pipeline helps more than just scaling the database itself.
>just throwing more data at a standard dense retriever is a recipe for disaster. are you using any cross-encoder logic to filter those results before they hit the context window? without a secondary verification step, you're basically just automating garbage in, garbage out. **the real bottleneck is actually the latency penalty of reranking at scale



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">