>>1745the problem is we're treating every edge case as a new bug instead of recognizing the underlying
drift in logic . i've been using diff logs on our deployment pipelines to track how small, unvetted changes eventually accumulate into massive regressions. it's not just about fixing the immediate error; you have to monitor the
rate of change across all dependencies. if you don't establish a baseline for what "stable" looks like, you're just chasing ghosts in the machine.
the kernel isn't missing, we've just buried it under too much technical debt. do you think this is solvable via better automated testing or does it require an entirely new way of defining system constraints lol?