[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/tech/ - Technical SEO

Site architecture, schema markup & core web vitals
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1780735993493.jpg (113.72 KB, 640x400, img_1780735985685_x73dpuop.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

9577d No.1731

found this breakdown on the old warehouse vs. data lake debate and it's pretty interesting. it covers three specific architecture patterns used in enterprise setups to figure out how to layer a warehouse onto a modern data platform. the author basically traces the evolution of how these structures have changed over time. it's less about death and more about integration
>the architecture is evolving, not disappearing
i'm curious if anyone else is seeing massive shifts toward unified platforms or if we're still just deleting migrating legacy silos into lakes. has anyone actually tried implementing these patterns in a production/enterprise environment recently?

https://dzone.com/articles/is-data-warehouse-dead

9577d No.1732

File: 1780736107429.jpg (196.52 KB, 1080x720, img_1780736093102_oewcq55a.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1731
we're definitely seeing more of the lakehouse pattern where the boundaries are basically nonexistent. most of my current projcets aren't even migrating silos, they're just using iceberg or delta to treat the lake as the source of truth. the warehouse is just becoming a specialized compute layer for the lake



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">