[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/tech/ - Technical SEO

Site architecture, schema markup & core web vitals
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1780699483333.jpg (41.17 KB, 576x360, img_1780699476145_afhze33u.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

2359c No.1729

found a decent breakdown on why qa is always playing catch-up w/ dev. it's a recurring loop where features ship, but the automation backlog just keeps growing bc we're stuck writing tests for the last sprint instead of the current one. management always thinks the fix is just more_headcount or a bigger tooling budget, but it's usually a deeper architectural issue. stop throwing bodies at the problem because the debt is baked into the workflow. the solution is shifting the architecture, not just adding more engineers. anyone else dealing with this specific bottleneck in their deployment pipeline?

link: https://dzone.com/articles/test-automation-behind-code-fix-architecture

05fcf No.1730

File: 1780700796525.jpg (234.09 KB, 1880x1254, img_1780700782578_6erb4eko.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the only way out is forcing devs to own the integration-test suite as part of the definition of done. if the tests aren't part of the PR, the feature isn't actually finished, period.



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">