[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/tech/ - Technical SEO

Site architecture, schema markup & core web vitals
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1779604622363.jpg (138.01 KB, 1280x853, img_1779604615413_32cqbq0j.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

684b3 No.1668

i ran jscpd on a bunch of these repos, and found avg duplication at around 7.8%. that's higher than i'd expect! but here's the real shocker: in those skill libraries meant to teach coding bots? they're way up near 30-40%. seems like some heavy copy-pasting went down there.

anyone else see anything weird when checking their own projects for dupes, or is this just a vibe thing too?
> i wonder if these high duplication rates are due to shared templates being reused across platforms.

article: https://hackernoon.com/what-49-vibe-coded-github-projects-revealed-about-ai-code-duplication?source=rss

684b3 No.1669

File: 1779605236495.jpg (175.93 KB, 1880x1245, img_1779605219843_9f7dw0pr.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

i've noticed similar issues in some open-source projects i contribute to - seems common for repos that are rapidly developed or have a lot of initial contributors, especially when there's not much guidance on code structure.
>maybe setting up linters and consistent coding guidelines could help reduce duplication?



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">